Automotive Experiences

Articles

Influence of Driver-Steering Wheel Distance on Multi-Body-Region Injury Outcomes in Frontal Crashes Using Finite Element Analysis

Polpity Arachchige Kavishanka Priyabasan Indrajith , Muhammad Zahir Hassan , Juffrizal Karjanto

Published
December 27, 2025

Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025)
Pages 624-639

DOI

Open Access
Share

Abstract

The objective of this paper was to investigate the influence of driver seating distance on injury outcome. The study employed controlled finite element analysis using a virtual dummy and a mid-sized sedan to examine the isolated effect of driver seating distance on injury severity. Three simulations were conducted by varying the seating distance from the closest position to the farthest position (corresponding horizontal positions from chest to steering distances 308 mm, 358 mm, and 408 mm, respectively), while maintaining an identical frontal crash into a rigid wall. Injury severity was analyzed using established biomechanical injury criteria, including Head Injury Criterion (HIC15) for head trauma, maximum rib deflection (Rmax) and Principal Component score for chest injury, anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and acetabulum forces for pelvic injury, and Tibia Index for lower extremity injury. The simulation results revealed that the driver's seating distance influenced the selected body regions in a distinct pattern. Contrary to the conventional assumption, the intermediate position produced the highest head injury risk (HIC15 = 824.5), compared to the closed position (HIC15 = 693.4) and the farthest position (HIC15 = 749.9). In the chest, the closest position (Rmax = 87.2mm) contributed 6.6% higher rib deflection than the farthest position (Rmax = 81.8mm).  Conversely, pelvic loading (ASIS force) increased by 9.1% with increased seating distance (from the closest to the farthest position). Lower extremity injury risk was highest in the closest position due to early knee-dashboard contact. These results indicate that the distance between the driver and the steering wheel affects the injury risk to the occupant in a distinct manner rather than uniformly increasing or decreasing overall injury severity. The optimal seating position varies by body region due to differences in restraint system interaction timing, load distribution patterns, and contact mechanics, emphasizing the need for position-specific injury mitigation strategies.

Keywords

Frontal crash simulation; Occupant protection; Seating position; Injury biomechanics; THOR dummy

References

  1. M. I. Sulaiman et al., “Non-Driving Related Activities Inside an Automated Vehicle Among Malaysia Passengers,†Automotive Experiences, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 452–465, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.31603/ae.9152.
  2. A. I. Petrov and A. V. Pistsov, “Training and Applying Artificial Neural Networks in Traffic Light Control: Improving the Management and Safety of Road Traffic in Tyumen (Russia),†Automotive Experiences, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 528–550, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.31603/ae.10025.
  3. World Health Organization, Global status report on road safety 2023. 2023.
  4. N. Lubbe, H. Jeppsson, S. Sternlund, and A. Morando, “Injury risk curves to guide safe speed limits on Swedish roads using German crash data supplemented with estimated non-injury crashes,†Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 202, p. 107586, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107586.
  5. A. Leledakis, J. Östh, J. Davidsson, and L. Jakobsson, “The influence of car passengers’ sitting postures in intersection crashes,†Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 157, p. 106170, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106170.
  6. D. Bose, J. R. Crandall, C. D. Untaroiu, and E. H. Maslen, “Influence of pre-collision occupant parameters on injury outcome in a frontal collision,†Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 1398–1407, Jul. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.03.004.
  7. R. Welsh, L. Clift, A. Morris, S. Cook, and J. Watson, An assessment of cars for small drivers. 2003.
  8. X. Ye et al., “Numerical investigation of driver lower extremity injuries in finite element frontal crash reconstruction,†Traffic Injury Prevention, vol. 19, no. sup1, pp. S21–S28, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1376051.
  9. X. Ye, J. P. Gaewsky, D. A. Jones, L. E. Miller, J. D. Stitzel, and A. A. Weaver, “Computational modeling and analysis of thoracolumbar spine fractures in frontal crash reconstruction,†Traffic Injury Prevention, vol. 19, no. sup2, pp. S32–S39, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1498090.
  10. E. Mishra and N. Lubbe, “Assessing injury risks of reclined occupants in a frontal crash preceded by braking with varied seatbelt designs using the SAFER Human Body Model,†Traffic Injury Prevention, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 445–453, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1080/15389588.2024.2318414.
  11. B. Jonsson, “Hand Position on Steering Wheel During Driving,†Traffic Injury Prevention, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 187–190, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.1080/15389588.2010.533722.
  12. S. Xiao, S. You, T. Tian, J. Wu, and H. Zhang, “Investigation of lower limb injury under different contact stiffness for drivers during frontal crash,†Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics, vol. 24, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.37190/ABB-02057-2022-02.
  13. M. Segui-Gomez, J. Levy, H. Roman, K. M. Thompson, K. McCabe, and J. D. Graham, “Driver distance from the steering wheel: perception and objective measurement.,†American Journal of Public Health, vol. 89, no. 7, pp. 1109–1111, Jul. 1999, doi: 10.2105/AJPH.89.7.1109.
  14. J. Forman et al., “Automobile injury trends in the contemporary fleet: Belted occupants in frontal collisions,†Traffic Injury Prevention, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 607–612, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1630825.
  15. L. Watkins, W. Millis, and H. Kwon, “THOR-50M In-Dummy Data Acquisition System Evaluation (Report No. DOT HS 813 618),†2024.
  16. M. B. Panzer, S. Guidice, and J. R. Crandall, “Evaluation of the NHTSA THOR finite element model,†2015.
  17. K. Maehara, Y. Dokko, and K. Ohhashi, “A Study on the Method to Reduce Thoracic Injury in Frontal Crash using Elderly Human and THOR FE Models,†in 27th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV), 2023.
  18. Center for Collision Safety and Analysis, “Development & Validation of a Finite Element Model for the 2012 Toyota Camry Passenger Sedan,†Tech Summary, no. May, pp. 1–5, 2016, doi: 10.13021/G8N88.
  19. D. Marzougui, D. Brown, H. K. Park, C. D. Kan, and K. S. Opiela, “Development & Validation of a Finite Element Model for a Mid-Sized Passenger Sedan,†in 13th International LS-DYNA Users Conference, 2014, pp. 1–10.
  20. A. J. Golman, K. A. Danelson, L. E. Miller, and J. D. Stitzel, “Injury prediction in a side impact crash using human body model simulation,†Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 64, pp. 1–8, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.10.026.
  21. A. Hault-Dubrulle, F. Robache, M.-P. Pacaux, and H. Morvan, “Determination of pre-impact occupant postures and analysis of consequences on injury outcome. Part I: A driving simulator study,†Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 66–74, Jan. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.07.012.
  22. G. P. Siegmund, D. D. Chimich, B. E. Heinrichs, A. L. DeMarco, and J. R. Brault, “Variations in Occupant Response with Seat Belt Slack and Anchor Location During Moderate Frontal Impacts,†Traffic Injury Prevention, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 38–43, Mar. 2005, doi: 10.1080/15389580590903159.
  23. Xuewei Shi, Sen Xiao, and Yanchao Qie, “Analysis of chest injury characteristics in frontal vehicle collision under three typical overlaps,†Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, vol. 235, no. 2–3, pp. 580–588, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1177/0954407020957482.
  24. W. T. Hollowell, H. C. Gabler, S. L. Stucki, S. Summers, and N. James R. Hackney, Review of potential test procedures FMVSS No. 208. 1998.
  25. H. J. Mertz, A. L. Irwin, and P. Prasad, “Biomechanical and Scaling Basis for Frontal and Side Impact Injury Assessment Reference Values,†in Stapp car crash journal, Nov. 2016. doi: 10.4271/2016-22-0018.
  26. R. Eppinger et al., “Development of Improved Injury Criteria for the Assessment of Advanced Automotive Restraint Systems - II By,†in National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC, 1999.
  27. L. Chybowski and W. Przetakiewicz, “Estimation of the Probability of Head Injury at a Given Abbreviated Injury Scale Level by Means of a Fuction of Head Injury Criterion,†System Safety: Human - Technical Facility - Environment, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 91–99, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.2478/czoto-2020-0012.
  28. M. Nylund and N. Olofsson, “Rib fracture injury risk function assessment for the THOR-50M using population-based finite element crash reconstructions,†Chalmers University Of Technology, 2022.
  29. Z. Gao, J. Cheng, R. McCoy, X. Li, R. El-Jawahri, and S. Barbat, Acetabulum Injury Investigation of Proposed US-NCAP in OI Mode. SAE Technical Paper, 2018. doi: 10.4271/2018-01-0538.
  30. J. Uriot, P. Potier, P. Baudrit, X. Trosseille, O. Richard, and R. Douard, “Comparison of HII, HIII and THOR dummy responses with respect to PMHS sled tests,†IRCOBI Conference 2015, 2015, pp. 435–451.
  31. P. Li, Y. Lei, J. Liao, D. Zhang, X. Dong, and T. Zhang, “Study of AEB and active seat belt on driver injury in vehicle–vehicle frontal oblique crash,†Scientific Reports, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 22621, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48729-7.
Article Metrics
26
Views
22
Downloads

SCITE

DIMENSIONS

Publication Information
Published December 27, 2025
Section Articles
Copyright Copyright (c) 2025 Polpity Arachchige Kavishanka Priyabasan Indrajith, Muhammad Zahir Hassan, Assistant, Juffrizal Karjanto
Keywords
  • Frontal crash simulation
  • Occupant protection
  • Seating position
  • Injury biomechanics
  • THOR dummy

Most read articles by the same author(s)