Automotive Experiences

Articles

Crashworthiness Evaluation of a Parallel 5-Tube Circular Multi-Segment Crash Box with Cutting Die Trigger for Railway Safety

Muhammad Vendy Hermawan , Moch. Agus Choiron , Anindito Purnowidodo , Winarto Winarto

Published
December 27, 2025

Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025)
Pages 683-702

DOI

Open Access
Share

Abstract

This study presents a crashworthiness evaluation of a Parallel 5-Tube Circular Multi-Segment Crash Box with a cutting die trigger, designed to promote controlled progressive folding for high-speed railway applications. The crash box integrates four primary tubes and one secondary tube in a parallel configuration, featuring multi-segment wall thickness and a die-trigger mechanism designed to initiate controlled folding from the tube’s end. The die acts as a deformation initiator, guiding the folding sequence to occur progressively, thereby improving energy dissipation and reducing peak impact forces. Two impact models, namely the Cutting Die Model (CDM) and the Flat Model (FM), were employed to investigate the combined effects of trigger mechanism, multi-segment wall thickness, and impact direction using validated finite element simulations supported by quasi-static and drop-test experiments. Finite Element Analysis (FEA) simulations using ANSYS LS-DYNA were conducted to assess key crashworthiness indicators, including maximum crushing force (Fmax), energy absorption (EA), specific energy absorption (SEA), mean crushing force (Fmean), and crushing force efficiency (CFE). Experimental validation through quasi-static and drop tests confirmed the reliability of the simulation results. The findings reveal that the CDM configuration significantly outperforms the FM model, exhibiting lower Fmax and higher EA, SEA, and CFE values. Progressive folding initiated by the die mechanism enables more stable and efficient energy dissipation. Additionally, the impact direction influences deformation behavior, with the tâ‚”“tâ‚‚ configuration yielding superior performance. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed crash box design in meeting the stringent safety and spatial requirements of modern railway systems.

Keywords

Energy dissipation; Crash energy optimization; Passive safety enhancement; Structural deformation control; Crash simulation modeling

References

  1. H. R. Zarei and M. Kröger, “Optimization of the foam-filled aluminum tubes for crush box application,†Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 214–221, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2007.07.016.
  2. C. Yang and Q. M. Li, “Structural optimisation for the collapse zone of a railway vehicle,†International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, vol. 165, no. September 2019, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105201.
  3. Y. Hermawan, I. G. K. Puja, and H. Y. Nanlohy, “Optimization of glass fiber reinforced polymer composite using response surface methodology for application on train panels,†Mechanical Engineering for Society and Industry, vol. 5, no. 2, 2025, doi: 10.31603/mesi.13090.
  4. W. A. Wirawan et al., “Crashworthiness characteristic of aluminum/composite hybrid tubes under axial compression,†Results in Engineering, vol. 25, no. January, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103889.
  5. D. H. Wakhidah, M. A. Choiron, A. Purnowidodo, and Y. S. Irawan, “Crashworthiness Performance of Circular Hybrid Crash Box Due to Axial Load,†International Journal of Integrated Engineering, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 182–194, 2024, doi: 10.30880/ijie.2024.16.02.019.
  6. Z. Z. Li, T. Zhu, S. N. Xiao, J. K. Zhang, X. R. Wang, and H. X. Ding, “Simulation method for train curve derailment collision and the effect of curve radius on collision response,†Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, vol. 237, no. 9, pp. 1130–1139, 2023, doi: 10.1177/09544097231154313.
  7. J. Xing et al., “Crashworthiness optimisation of a step-like bi-tubular energy absorber for subway vehicles,†International Journal of Crashworthiness, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 252–262, 2020, doi: 10.1080/13588265.2019.1577522.
  8. Y. Peng, S. Wang, S. Yao, and P. Xu, “Crashworthiness analysis and optimization of a cutting-style energy absorbing structure for subway vehicles,†Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 120, no. August, pp. 225–235, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2017.09.006.
  9. S. Xie, S. Zheng, J. Zhang, Z. Liu, and H. Zhou, “The design of circular tubes with stepped varying thicknesses and their synergistic multi-tube combination,†Structures, vol. 57, no. June, p. 105125, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105125.
  10. Z. Lu et al., “Numerical and experimental study on the design strategy of a new collapse zone structure for railway vehicles,†International Journal of Crashworthiness, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 488–502, 2017, doi: 10.1080/13588265.2017.1281080.
  11. W. A. Wirawan et al., “Collapse Behavior and Energy Absorption Characteristics of Design Multi-Cell Thin Wall Structure 3D-Printed Under Quasi Statistic Loads,†Automotive Experiences, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 149–160, May 2024, doi: 10.31603/ae.10892.
  12. İ. Özen, H. Gedikli, and M. Aslan, “Experimental and numerical investigation on energy absorbing characteristics of empty and cellular filled composite crash boxes,†Engineering Structures, vol. 289, no. January, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116315.
  13. J. Xing, P. Xu, S. Yao, H. Zhao, Z. Zhao, and Z. Wang, “Study on the layout strategy of diaphragms to enhance the energy absorption of thin-walled square tubes,†Structures, vol. 29, no. December 2020, pp. 294–304, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2020.11.024.
  14. R. Ardiansyah, F. K. Indriani, D. Hidayat, A. Tjahjono, A. Nurrohmad, and A. Marta, “Crashworthiness Performance Study of 3D-Printed Multi-Cell Tubes Hybridized with Aluminum Under Axial Quasi-Static Testing,†Automotive Experiences, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 567–578, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.31603/ae.12247.
  15. J. Chen, P. Xu, S. Yao, J. Xing, and Z. Hu, “The multi-objective structural optimisation design to improve the crashworthiness of a multi-cell structure for high-speed train,†International Journal of Crashworthiness, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 24–33, 2022, doi: 10.1080/13588265.2020.1773739.
  16. I. Choirotin, M. A. Choiron, A. Purnowidodo, and D. B. Darmadi, “Deformation Mode and Energy Absorption Analysis of Bi-Tubular Corrugated Crash Box Structure,†International Journal of Integrated Engineering, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 274–280, 2021, doi: 10.30880/ijie.2021.13.07.031.
  17. M. S. Zahran, P. Xue, and M. S. Esa, “Novel approach for design of 3D-multi-cell thin-walled circular tube to improve the energy absorption characteristics under axial impact loading,†International Journal of Crashworthiness, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 294–306, 2017, doi: 10.1080/13588265.2016.1258958.
  18. R. D. Bintara and M. A. Choiron, “Deformation pattern and energy absorption of polylactic acid (PLA) carbon crash box under quasi static loading,†IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 1034, no. 1, p. 012011, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1757-899x/1034/1/012011.
  19. S. Yao, X. Xiao, P. Xu, Q. Qu, and Q. Che, “The impact performance of honeycomb-filled structures under eccentric loading for subway vehicles,†Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 123, no. October 2017, pp. 360–370, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2017.10.031.
  20. Z. Gao, H. Zhang, J. Zhao, Y. Zhang, and D. Ruan, “Oblique compression of square tubes with walls of different thicknesses,†Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 187, no. February, p. 110776, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2023.110776.
  21. A. Niknejad, M. M. Abedi, G. H. Liaghat, and M. Zamani Nejad, “Prediction of the mean folding force during the axial compression in foam-filled grooved tubes by theoretical analysis,†Materials and Design, vol. 37, pp. 144–151, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.12.032.
  22. P. Xu, J. Xing, S. Yao, C. Yang, K. Chen, and B. Li, “Energy distribution analysis and multi-objective optimization of a gradual energy-absorbing structure for subway vehicles,†Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 115, no. January, pp. 255–263, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2017.02.033.
  23. M. A. Choiron, A. Purnowidodo, E. S. Siswanto, and N. A. Hidayati, “Crash energy absorption of multi-segments crash box under frontal load,†Jurnal Teknologi, vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 347–350, 2016, doi: 10.11113/jt.v78.8334.
  24. O. M. Qureshi and E. Bertocchi, “Crash performance of notch triggers and variable frequency progressive-triggers on patterned box beams during axial impacts,†Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 63, pp. 98–105, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2012.07.021.
  25. X. W. Zhang, H. Su, and T. X. Yu, “Energy absorption of an axially crushed square tube with a buckling initiator,†International Journal of Impact Engineering, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 402–417, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.02.002.
  26. M. V. Hermawan, M. A. Choiron, A. Purnowidodo, and W. Winarto, “Effect of Tube Thickness Configuration of Two Segments Circular Crash Box on Its Crashworthiness Performance,†Automotive Experiences, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 189–204, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.31603/ae.13170.
  27. M. Yamashita, H. Kenmotsu, and T. Hattori, “Dynamic axial compression of aluminum hollow tubes with hat cross-section and buckling initiator using inertia force during impact,†Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 37–44, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2011.10.001.
  28. Y. B. Cho, C. H. Bae, M. W. Suh, and H. C. Sin, “A vehicle front frame crash design optimization using hole-type and dent-type crush initiator,†Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 415–428, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2006.03.011.
  29. T. N. Tran, “Crushing analysis under multiple impact loading cases for multi-cell triangular tubes,†Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 113, no. February, pp. 262–272, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2017.01.013.
  30. W. Guan, Y. Yu, and G. Gao, “Crashworthiness performance and multiobjective optimization of a combined splitting circular tube energy absorber under eccentric impact for subway vehicles,†International Journal of Impact Engineering, vol. 158, no. October 2020, p. 104006, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.104006.
  31. W. Guan, G. Gao, J. Li, and Y. Yu, “Crushing analysis and multi-objective optimization of a cutting aluminium tube absorber for railway vehicles under quasi-static loading,†Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 123, no. October 2017, pp. 395–408, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2017.11.031.
  32. H. Ning, X. Chen, Z. Liu, Z. Lei, and Q. Wang, “Energy absorption of thin-walled tubes with a pre-folded origami-inspired structure,†Advances in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1–17, 2025, doi: 10.1177/16878132251330663.
  33. A. Kuznetcov, I. Telichev, and C. Q. Wu, “Effect of Thin-walled Tube Geometry on Its Crashworthiness Performance,†in 14th International LS-DYNA Users Conference, 2016, pp. 1–12.
  34. T. Wierzbicki and W. Abramowicz, “On the Crushing Mechanics of Thin-Walled Structures,†Journal of Applied Mechanics, vol. 50, no. 4a, pp. 727–734, Dec. 1983, doi: 10.1115/1.3167137.
  35. S. Lu et al., “Energy absorption design for crash energy management passenger trains based on scaled model,†Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s00158-021-03116-6.
  36. H. Rostro-González, J. M. Puigoriol-Forcada, A. Pérez-Peña, J. Menacho, and A. A. Garcia-Granada, “Optimizing crash box design to meet injury criteria: a protocol for accurate simulation and material selection,†Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 1–17, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s00158-024-03855-2.
  37. BBN Steel, “St37-2 Steel Mechanical Properties,†BBN Steel Plate.
  38. D. Wang, P. Xu, X. Xiao, L. Kong, Q. Che, and C. Yang, “Multiobjective and multicollision scenario reliability-based design optimization of honeycomb-filled composite energy-absorbing structures for subways,†Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol. 65, no. 8, p. 238, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s00158-022-03343-5.
  39. C. J. Freitas, “Standards and Methods for Verification, Validation, and Uncertainty Assessments in Modeling and Simulation,†Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 2377–2158, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1115/1.4047274.
  40. G. S. Bjorkman and D. P. Molitoris, “Mesh Convergence Studies for Thin Shell Elements Developed by the ASME Task Group on Computational Modeling,†in Volume 2: Computer Technology and Bolted Joints, ASMEDC, Jan. 2011, pp. 119–123. doi: 10.1115/PVP2011-57705.
  41. I. Ansys, Technical Guide for Explicit Analyses using Ansys LS-DYNA, V1.5. Ansys, Inc., 2024.
  42. S. Mechanics, “LS - DYNA ® Handbookâ€.
  43. S. Alam, M. Uddin, and C. Hall, “Deformation and Energy Absorption Characteristics of Metallic Thin-Walled Tube with Hierarchical Honeycomb Lattice Infills for Crashworthiness Application,†Metals, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1–26, 2025, doi: 10.3390/met15060629.
  44. E. İ. Albak, E. Solmaz, A. R. Yıldız, and F. Öztürk, “Multiobjective crashworthiness optimization of graphene type multi-cell tubes under various loading conditions,†Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, vol. 43, no. 5, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s40430-021-02979-6.
  45. M. Rogala and J. Gajewski, “Crashworthiness Analysis of Thin-Walled Square Columns with a Hole Trigger,†Materials, vol. 16, no. 11, 2023, doi: 10.3390/ma16114196.
  46. C. Y. Wang, G. Lu, W. Z. Zhao, and Y. Wang, “Modeling and multi-objective optimization of a bionic crash box with folding deformation,†Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 283–299, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s00158-019-02360-1.
  47. Harikrishna and N. A. Sakle, “Design and Analysis of Compatibility of Crash Box with Trigger and Thickness Variation for Vehicle Frontal Part During Low Velocity Collision,†International Journal of Scientific Research & Engineering Trends, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 2890–2895, 2021.
  48. M.-G. Jo, T.-W. Lee, Y.-S. Lee, J.-S. Park, and J.-W. Wee, “Crashworthiness Analysis of Front Impact Beam with Various Sectional Shapes for Lightweight Electric Vehicles,†International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s40684-025-00775-4.
Article Metrics
27
Views
16
Downloads

SCITE

DIMENSIONS

Publication Information
Published December 27, 2025
Section Articles
Copyright Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Vendy Hermawan, Moch. Agus Choiron, Anindito Purnowidodo, Winarto Winarto
Keywords
  • Energy dissipation
  • Crash energy optimization
  • Passive safety enhancement
  • Structural deformation control
  • Crash simulation modeling

Most read articles by the same author(s)