Automotive Experiences

Articles

Optimized Flux-Weakening Strategy in Field-Oriented Control for High-Speed IPMSM Drives

Ho Minh Khoa Le , Thanh Phuc Le

Published
June 12, 2026

Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026)
Pages 331-344

DOI

Open Access
Share

Abstract

Unlocking the dynamic performance of electric vehicles is often limited by the voltage constraints of the battery system. This study proposes an optimized control strategy for Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors based on an analytical formulation of direct-axis current trajectories to maximize speed extension while maintaining torque smoothness under strict battery voltage constraints, utilizing parameters characteristic of commercial C-segment electric vehicles (e.g., VinFast VF e34). Through a comprehensive simulation framework, the research investigates a coordinated Field-Oriented Control scheme integrated with a Flux-Weakening strategy through direct-axis current adjustment to reconcile the conflict between high-speed operation (up to 6 times the base speed of 100 rad/s) and power quality. The analysis identifies a critical operating point at a direct-axis current of -25 A, which effectively prevents voltage saturation while maintaining torque smoothness. The results demonstrate that, when evaluated against the baseline Field-Oriented Control without flux-weakening at 600 rad/s, this specific trajectory significantly reduces torque ripple by 8.6 Nm and suppresses Total Harmonic Distortion to a negligible 0.19%. This combined mitigation contributes to the high-speed operating capability by preventing system oscillations and preserving linear voltage modulation at this upper speed limit. These findings provide a validated guideline for enhancing powertrain stability and mechanical lifespan in modern electric mobility.

Keywords

Electric vehicle; IPMSM; Field-oriented control; Flux-weakening

References

  1. [1] International Energy Agency, “Global EV Outlook 2024: Moving Towards Increased Affordability,” Paris, France, 2024.
  2. [2] I. B. Karpuzoglu, “Flux weakening in electric machines for automotive drives: Machine topologies, control aspects, energy and thermal behaviour, and design aspects,” Politecnico di Milano, 2022.
  3. [3] S. Alwaqfi, M. Alzayed, and H. Chaoui, “Flux-Weakening Control Methods for Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines in Electric Vehicles at High Speed,” Electronics, vol. 14, no. 19, p. 3779, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.3390/electronics14193779.
  4. [4] T. M. Jahns, “Flux-Weakening Regime Operation of an Interior Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Motor Drive,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. IA-23, no. 4, pp. 681–689, Jul. 1987, doi: 10.1109/TIA.1987.4504966.
  5. [5] T. Li, X. Sun, G. Lei, Y. Guo, Z. Yang, and J. Zhu, “Finite-Control-Set Model Predictive Control of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Drive Systems—An Overview,” IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 2087–2105, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1109/JAS.2022.105851.
  6. [6] K. Li, J. Ding, X. Sun, and X. Tian, “Overview of Sliding Mode Control Technology for Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor System,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 71685–71704, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3402983.
  7. [7] R. Jing, G. Wang, G. Zhang, and D. Xu, “Review of Field Weakening Control Strategies of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors,” CES Transactions on Electrical Machines and Systems, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 319–331, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.30941/CESTEMS.2024.00043.
  8. [8] I. 60034-1:2010, “Rotating electrical machines – Part 1: Rating and performance,” Geneva, Switzerland, 2010.
  9. [9] IEEE Standard, “IEEE Recommended Practice and Requirements for Harmonic Control in Electric Power Systems,” Mar. 27, 2014, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA. doi: 10.1109/IEEESTD.2014.6826459.
  10. [10] J. Zambada and D. Deb, “Motor control with digital signal controllers,” Chandler, AZ, USA, 2010.
  11. [11] D. C. Tri and L. T. Phuc, “Design of Driver Circuit to Control Induction Motor Applied in Electric Motorcycles,” in 2020 5th International Conference on Green Technology and Sustainable Development (GTSD), IEEE, Nov. 2020, pp. 326–333. doi: 10.1109/GTSD50082.2020.9303103.
  12. [12] L. T. Phuc and D. C. Tri, “Applying sine PWM Technique to Control Three-phase Induction Motor in Electric Motorcycles,” in 2022 6th International Conference on Green Technology and Sustainable Development (GTSD), IEEE, Jul. 2022, pp. 564–571. doi: 10.1109/GTSD54989.2022.9988765.
  13. [13] W. Abd El Maguid Ahmed, M. M. Adel, M. Taha, and A. A. Saleh, “PSO technique applied to sensorless field-oriented control PMSM drive with discretized RL-fractional integral,” Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 4029–4040, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2021.02.049.
  14. [14] L. T. Phuc, L. Q. Vu, and N. D. Toan, “Research on Application of Space Vector Pulse Width Modulation (SVPWM) to Control the Electric Motor in Motorcycles,” in 2024 7th International Conference on Green Technology and Sustainable Development (GTSD), IEEE, Jul. 2024, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/GTSD62346.2024.10675141.
  15. [15] Infineon Technologies, “FM3 Family 3-Phase PMSM FOC Control,” San Jose, CA, USA, 2017. doi: Appl. Note AN204469.
  16. [16] B. Akin, M. Bhardwaj, and J. Warriner, “Sensorless Field Oriented Control of 3-Phase Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors,” Dallas, TX, USA, 2013. doi: SPRABQ3.
  17. [17] N. Kongchoo, P. Santiprapan, and N. Jindapetch, “Mathematical Model and PI Controller Design Based on Indirect Vector Control for Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor,” ECTI Transactions on Computer and Information Technology (ECTI-CIT), vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 259–266, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.37936/ecti-cit.2022163.245351.
  18. [18] H. Aygun, M. Gokdag, M. Aktas, and M. Cernat, “A novel sensorless field oriented controller for Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors,” in 2014 IEEE 23rd International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE), IEEE, Jun. 2014, pp. 715–720. doi: 10.1109/ISIE.2014.6864700.
  19. [19] L. Wang, PID Control System Design and Automatic Tuning using MATLAB/Simulink. Wiley, 2020. doi: 10.1002/9781119469414.
  20. [20] N. Ramalingam, R. Yuvaraj, K. Kumar, R. D. Babu, M. Manikandan, and S. Meiyanbu, “Implementation of SPWM Technique for Inverter,” International Journal of Advanced Research in Biology, Engineering, Science and Technology (IJARBEST), vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 10–14, 2016.
  21. [21] B. Wu, High-Power Converters and AC Drives. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2006.
  22. [22] H. Wang, M. Yang, L. Niu, and D. Xu, “Improved deadbeat predictive current control strategy for permanent magnet motor drives,” in 2011 6th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications, IEEE, Jun. 2011, pp. 1260–1264. doi: 10.1109/ICIEA.2011.5975779.
  23. [23] S. Kouro, P. Cortes, R. Vargas, U. Ammann, and J. Rodriguez, “Model Predictive Control—A Simple and Powerful Method to Control Power Converters,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 1826–1838, Jun. 2009, doi: 10.1109/TIE.2008.2008349.
  24. [24] B. Sarsembayev, “High performance disturbance observer based control system design for permanent magnet synchronous AC machine applications,” Brunel University London, 2022.
  25. [25] S. Umans, A. Fitzgerald, and C. Kingsley, Electric Machinery. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2013.
  26. [26] M. H. Rashid, Power Electronics Handbook. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann (Elsevier), 2018.
  27. [27] The MathWorks Inc., “MATLAB and Simulink: Release 2023a,” 2023, Natick, MA, USA: R2023a.
  28. [28] V. T. and P. LLC, “VinFast VF e34: The First Smart Electric Car in Vietnam,” Hai Phong, Vietnam, 2022.
  29. [29] United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), Uniform provisions concerning the approval of internal combustion engines or electric drive trains intended for the propulsion of motor vehicles of categories M and N with regard to the measurement of net power and the maximum 30 minutes power of electric. 2013, p. Rev. 1.
  30. [30] T. Burress, “Benchmarking of the 2013 Nissan Leaf Electric Vehicle Electric Drive Unit,” Oak Ridge, TN, USA, 2014.
  31. [31] R. Xiao, S. Peng, Z. Huang, and G. Chen, “Deep flux weakening control strategy for IPMSM with variable direct axis current limitations,” Electrical Engineering, vol. 104, no. 5, pp. 3425–3434, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s00202-022-01557-w.
  32. [32] Z. Yi, X. Li, Y. Yin, J. Liu, and K. Zhao, “Deep Flux Weakening Control of IPMSM Based on D-axis Current Error Integral Regulator,” Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, vol. 118, pp. 163–175, 2023, doi: 10.2528/PIERM23080101.
  33. [33] J.-H. Park, H.-S. Lim, G.-H. Lee, and H.-H. Lee, “A Study on the Optimal Control of Voltage Utilization for Improving the Efficiency of PMSM,” Electronics, vol. 11, no. 13, p. 2095, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.3390/electronics11132095.
  34. [34] T. Yahia, Z. M. S. Elbarbary, S. A. Alqahtani, and A. A. Ahmed, “Event-Triggered Extension of Duty-Ratio-Based MPDSC with Field Weakening for PMSM Drives in EV Applications,” Machines, vol. 14, no. 2, p. 137, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.3390/machines14020137.
  35. [35] H.-J. Cho, Y.-C. Kwon, and S.-K. Sul, “Torque Ripple-Minimizing Control of IPMSM With Optimized Current Trajectory,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 3852–3862, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1109/TIA.2021.3075424.
Article Metrics
152
Views
39
Downloads

SCITE

DIMENSIONS

Publication Information
Published June 12, 2026
Section Articles
Copyright Copyright (c) 2026 Ho Minh Khoa Le, Thanh Phuc Le
License Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Keywords
  • Electric vehicle
  • IPMSM
  • Field-oriented control
  • Flux-weakening