Paedagogie

Articles

Peran Heuristik dalam Mengembangkan Kerangka Ilmu Pengetahuan Modern

Amir Basari Zanki , Moh Fahrul , Jupriadi J. Pahude , Lukman S Thahir , Nurhayati Nurhayati , Harits Azmi Zanki , Indriani Indriani

Abstract

This study examines the role of heuristics in developing the framework of modern scientific knowledge through a library research method utilizing twenty journal articles published within the last decade. The central question addressed concerns how heuristics function as both cognitive and methodological mechanisms shaping reasoning patterns, theory construction, and scientific problem-solving. This study employs a library research approach by systematically reviewing relevant scientific articles through structured processes of searching, screening, and examining indexed academic literature. The data were analyzed using content analysis and thematic synthesis to identify key concepts, thematic trends, and the relationships among arguments presented across the selected studies. The findings reveal that heuristics operate not merely as simplification strategies but as epistemological foundations enabling the emergence of new conceptual models, theoretical revisions, and scientific innovation. Principles such as analogy, abstraction, concept mapping, and pattern-based reasoning contribute significantly to research efficiency and strengthen the validity of scientific inference. The study concludes that the modern scientific knowledge framework is inherently adaptive and evolves through continuous heuristic processes. Its implications include reinforcing the theoretical basis of modern epistemology, enhancing heuristic integration within methodological design, and emphasizing the need to incorporate heuristic competencies in education and future research development.

Keywords

Heuristics; Modern Epistemology; Scientific Knowledge Framework; Scientific Reasoning; Theoretical Innovation

References

  1. Aguinis, Herman; & kolega. (2024). The research transparency index. The Leadership Quarterly, 35 (4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2024.101809
  2. Bargagli Stoffi, Falco J., Cevolani, Gustavo, & Gnecco, Giorgio. (2022). Simple Models in Complex Worlds: Occam’s Razor and Statistical Learning Theory. Minds and Machines 32, 13-42.
  3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-022-09592-z
  4. Bornmann, Lutz & Hug, Sven. (2019). Heuristics as conceptual lens for understanding and studying the usage of bibliometrics in research evaluation. Scientometrics, 120 (1), 419-459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03018-x
  5. Dermawan, Habib & Hasibuan, Abdurrozzaq. (2022). Metode Penelitian Eksperimen: Prinsip, Prosedur, dan Aplikasi dalam Penelitian Ilmiah. Factory: Jurnal Industri, Manajemen dan Rekayasa Sistem Industri, 3 (2), 47-50. https://doi.org/10.56211/factory.v3i2.729
  6. Fernández Pinto, Manuela. 2023. Methodological and Cognitive Biases in Science: Issues for Current Research and Ways to Counteract Them. Perspectives on Science, 31(5), 535-554.
  7. https://doi.org/10.1162/posc_a_00589
  8. Gigerenzer, Gerd; Reb, Jochen; Luan, Shenghua. (2022). Smart Heuristics for Individuals, Teams, and Organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 9, 171-198. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-090506
  9. Guntur, (2022). A conceptual framework for qualitative research: a literature studies. Capture: Jurnal Seni Media Rekam, 10 (2), 91-106. https://doi.org/10.33153/capture.v10i2.2447
  10. Hariyati, Mutty,. Fajar Arianto, Martadi, & Fiqrie Restia Agusti. (2024). Analisis Strategi Peningkatan Literasi Dasar pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar di Surabaya untuk Mendukung PISA: A Systematic Literature Review. Lentera Pustaka: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Perpustakaan, Informasi dan Kearsipan, 10 (2), 213-224. http://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/lpustaka
  11. Katsikopoulos, V. (2023). The less-is-more effect: Predictions and tests. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500003491
  12. Helgeson, Casey; Srikrishnan, Vivek; Keller, Klaus; Tuana, Nancy. (2022). Why Simpler Computer Simulation Models Can Be Epistemically Better for Informing Decisions. Philosophy of Science, 88 (2), 213-233. https://doi.org/10.1086/711501
  13. Hey, Spencer Phillips. (2016). Heuristics and meta heuristics in scientific judgement. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 67 (2), 471-495. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axu045
  14. Hjeij, Mohamad & Arnis Vilks (2023). A brief history of heuristics: how did research on heuristics evolve. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, 64. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01542-z
  15. Marewski, Julian N. & Hoffrage, Ulrich. (2025). Heuristics: how simple models of the mind can serve as tools for transparent scientific justification. Mind & Society. Advance online publication 24, 947-998. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11299-025-00354-9
  16. Methling, Florian; Abdeen, Sara J. M.; von Nitzsch, Rüdiger. (2022). Heuristics in multi criteria decision making: The cost of fast and frugal decisions. EURO Journal on Decision Processes 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejdp.2022.100013
  17. Miles, Matthew B.; Huberman, A. Michael; Saldaña, Johnny. (2018). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (Fourth Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  18. Raab, Markus & Gigerenzer, Gerd. (2015). The power of simplicity: a fast and frugal heuristics approach to performance science. Frontiers in Psychology 6, 1672. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01672
  19. Russek, Evan; Moran, Rani; Liu, Yunzhe; Dolan, Raymond J.; Huys, Quentin JM (2024). Heuristik dalam pengambilan keputusan berisiko berkaitan dengan representasi informasi yang lebih disukai. Nature Communications 15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48547-z
  20. Saumantri, Theguh. (2022) Konstruksi Pengetahuan dalam Perspektif Metodologi Program Riset Ilmiah Imre Lakatos. Tasamuh: Jurnal Studi Islam, 14 (2). https://doi.org/10.47945/tasamuh.v14i2.680
  21. Sayono, Joko. (2021). Langkah-langkah heuristik dalam metode sejarah di era digital. Sejarah dan Budaya: Jurnal Sejarah, Budaya, dan Pengajarannya, 15 (2), 369-376. https://doi.org/10.17977/um021v15i22021p369-376
  22. Schultze, Johannes; Hilbig, Benjamin E.; Haug, Markus; Reinecke, Julian; Marewski, Julian N. (2024). Heuristics in philosophy. Asian Journal of Philosophy, 39 (3), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44204-024-00174-7
  23. Sean Grant dan Sayak Khatua. (2024). Kebijakan dan program transparansi dan reproduksibilitas penelitian pada inisiatif internasional untuk evaluasi dampak. Jurnal Efektivitas Pembangunan, 16 (3), 363-373. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2024.2388102
  24. Sukur, Silvester Goridus & Mina, Yustina. (2024). The Quality of the Scientific English Used in the Sinta Indexed Journal Articles in Indonesia: A Content Analysis. JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 12 (1), 153-167. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i1.9036
  25. Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
  26. Tsaniyah, Faizah Ats; Ningsih, Santika Purwaty; Cyntia, Dinda Yovita; Kusumasari, Indah Respati; Hidayat, Rusdi N. (2024). The Role of Big Data Analytics in Supporting Decision Making Theories in Companies. Jurnal Bisnis dan Komunikasi Digital, 2 (2), 10. https://doi.org/10.47134/jbkd.v2i2.3458
  27. Valerjev, Pavle & Dujmović, Marin. (2023). Single Heuristic Reasoning: Is It Still Dual Process. Journal of Intelligence, 11 (2), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11020033
  28. Wuriyudani, Hasri Arlin; Wiyanto, Wiyanto; & Darsono, Teguh. (2021). Problem Solving Heuristic to Develop Scientific Reasoning. Physics Communication, 3 (1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.15294/physcomm.v3i1.15022
  29. Zwirn, Hervé & Zwirn, Denis. (2025). Reasoning by Analogy and by Difference. Journal for General Philosophy of Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-025-09718-8
  30. Nadurak, P. (2025). Heuristics and cognitive biases: A conceptual analysis. Journal of Cognitive Science and Decision Making. Advance online publication. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/397132875