Borobudur Communication Review

Articles

Analysis of Associative and Dissociative Communication Between Seventeen and Carat in Weverse

Azzahra Woro Kinanti , Dani Fadillah

Abstract

This research examines the associative and dissociative communication between the group SEVENTEEN and its fans, Carat, on the Weverse platform. Apps like Weverse have made the relationship between idols and fans increasingly dynamic in the digital age, enabling two-way communication through posts, comments, and live streams. However, this communication pattern often blends positive support with potential conflict—an issue that has not been widely discussed within the Indonesian fandom. The research question focuses on how associative communication (support, solidarity) and dissociative communication (reprimands, privacy boundaries) emerge in interactions and how this impacts the cohesion of the digital community. For observations conducted from December 2024 to June 2025, a qualitative method employing virtual ethnography and content analysis was applied. This utilized data triangulation from screenshots and field notes. The results reveal distinct patterns: associative communication through support (such as Dino’s “chanranghae”) and humor (such as Vernon-Carats), and dissociative communication through subtle reprimands (such as S. Coups and Woozi addressing inappropriate jokes). The negotiation of symbolic meaning reinforces loyalty and norms, according to symbolic interaction theory. On Weverse, communication fosters healthy fandom dynamics through a balance of associative (strengthening emotional bonds) and dissociative (maintaining ethical boundaries) interactions. This contributes to studies of digital communication and entertainment industry strategies.

Keywords

Associative Communication; Dissociative Communication; Seventeen; Carat; Weverse

References

  1. Dariusz, D. (2022). Association with and dissociation from groups in response to personal and social identity threats: the role of self-construal and anxiety. The Open Psychology Journal, 15(1).
  2. Derung, T. N. (2017a). Interaksionisme simbolik dalam kehidupan bermasyarakat. SAPA: Jurnal Kateketik Dan Pastoral, 2(1), 118–131.
  3. Derung, T. N. (2017b). Interaksionisme simbolik dalam kehidupan bermasyarakat. SAPA: Jurnal Kateketik Dan Pastoral, 2(1), 118–131.
  4. Diva, A., & Indriastuti, Y. (2024). Self Disclosure SEVENTEEN CARAT Melalui Fan Account di Media Sosial Twitter “X.” Journal Education Innovation (JEI), 2(2), 252–259.
  5. Flinchum, E., Roy, E., & Arif, R. (2024). Displays of Parasocial Interaction in K-Pop: A Content Analysis of YouTube Comments on BTS’s Music Videos. Korean Journal of Communication, 1(2), 77–109.
  6. Handoyo, P. (2015). Anggie Wahyu Pusparatri. Paradigma, 3(01).
  7. Hess, A. (2001). Emile Durkheim, Georg Simmel and Ferdinand Tönnies: Social Differentiation and Functionalist Sociology BT - Concepts of Social Stratification (pp. 36–49). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230629219_4
  8. Jennissen, R., Bovens, M., Engbersen, G., & Bokhorst, M. (2022). Strengthening social cohesion BT - Migration Diversity and Social Cohesion: Reassessing the Dutch Policy Agenda (pp. 101–134). Springer.
  9. Kelshaw, T. (2005). Political Participation. Communication as...: Perspectives on Theory, 155.
  10. Kim, Y. Y. (2007). Ideology, Identity, and Intercultural Communication: An Analysis of Differing Academic Conceptions of Cultural Identity. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 36(3), 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475750701737181
  11. Lee, Y., & Park, S. (2025). Classifying and Characterizing Fandom Activities: A Focus on Superfans’ Posting and Commenting Behaviors in a Digital Fandom Community. Applied Sciences, 15(9), 4723. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15094723
  12. Mayasari, F. (2022). Etnografi Virtual Fenomena Cancel Culture dan Partisipasi Pengguna Media terhadap Tokoh Publik di Media Sosia. 1, 27–44.
  13. Mekarisce, A. A. (2020). Teknik pemeriksaan keabsahan data pada penelitian kualitatif di bidang kesehatan masyarakat. Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan Masyarakat: Media Komunikasi Komunitas Kesehatan Masyarakat, 12(3), 145–151.
  14. Nurfajriani, W. V, Ilhami, M. W., Mahendra, A., Afgani, M. W., & Sirodj, R. A. (2024). Triangulasi data dalam analisis data kualitatif. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 10(17), 826–833.
  15. Nurhidayat, I., & Garis, R. R. (2023). Trend Komunikasi Politik Di Media Sosial. Jurnal Lanskap Politik, 1(2), 1–24.
  16. Osborne, N. R., Owen, A. M., & Fernández-Espejo, D. (2015). The dissociation between command following and communication in disorders of consciousness: an fMRI study in healthy subjects. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00493
  17. Rachmaniar R. A., P. P. (2021). Studi Etnografi Virtual tentang Budaya Mahasiswa dalam Perkuliahan Online di Aplikasi Zoom. 20, 81–92.
  18. Saldyni, N. (2021). Mengenal Weverse, Aplikasi yang Tengah Populer di Kalangan Fans KPop. URBANASIA.
  19. Sarmiati, E. R. R. (2019). Komunikasi Interpersonal Elva Ronaning Roem Sarmiati Cv. Irdh.
  20. Seligman, R., & Kirmayer, L. J. (2008). Dissociative Experience and Cultural Neuroscience: Narrative, Metaphor and Mechanism. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 32(1), 31–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-007-9077-8
  21. Sofiyana, M. S., Lestari, L. D., Triamini, M. H., Faizah, A. I., & Ardiyansyah, V. R. (2021). Sosialisasi Pemanfaatan Media Sosial Untuk Meningkatkan Pemasaran UMKM di Kecamatan Sutojayan, Kabupaten Blitar. J. APTEKMAS (Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat), 4(4), 96–100. https://jurnal.polsri.ac.id/index.php/aptekmas/article/view/3556/1732
  22. Sugiyono, P. D. (2010). Metode Peneliian. Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D.
  23. Tofani, A. Z. (2023). Weverse Sebagai Sarana Komunikasi Fans Dengan Idol (Studi Pada Interaksi Seventeen Dan Carat). Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Sosial Dan Politik (Konaspol), 1, 349–358.