Community Empowerment

Articles

Tactile Flipbook Magic: A multisensory framework for enhancing phonics decoding skills in primary education

Ana Zulianingrum , Sheila Wijayanti , Ajeng Ayu Ramadhanti , Naila Suryani

Abstract

Traditional learning methods often face difficulties in concretizing the abstract relationship between sounds and letters. This community service program addresses an important challenge in teaching foundational phonic decoding skills to early childhood learners at SD Angkasa 01 Halim Perdanakusuma. The purpose of this activity is to design, implement, and evaluate the impact of "Flipbook Magic," an interactive tactile medium, on students' decoding abilities and teachers' pedagogical competence. The methodology used follows a four-stage collaborative model, which includes needs analysis, collaborative medium creation process with teachers, direct implementation in grade II through co-teaching sessions, and evaluation with mixed methods (quantitative and qualitative). The results from the structured observation checklist showed a significant increase in students' decoding skills. The percentage of students able to blend CVC patterns independently increased from 20% to 80%, while 40% of students successfully blended target CVCC/CCVC patterns independently and another 40% succeeded with teacher assistance. Qualitatively, the use of this medium significantly increased student engagement and participation in learning. In addition, the applied mentoring model successfully empowered teachers, with more than 90% of teachers showing the ability to use the medium independently and integrate it into lesson plans. The program concludes that Flipbook Magic, combined with a partnership-based empowerment approach, is an effective strategy to improve early literacy learning. Therefore, schools are advised to adopt similar practice-based learning tools and collaborative professional development models to maintain sustainability and expand the improvement of phonics education.

References

  1. Bara, F., Gentaz, E., & Colé, P. (2007). Haptics in learning to read with children from low socio-economic status families. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 25(4), 643–663.
  2. Birsh, J. R. (2017). Multisensory Teaching of Basic Language Skills Third Edition. Brookes Publishing Company.
  3. Blomert, L., & Froyen, D. (2010). Multi-sensory learning and learning to read. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 77(3), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPSYCHO.2010.06.025
  4. Boyd, P., & Szplit, A. (2014). Teacher Educators and Teachers as Learners International Perspectives.
  5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.
  6. Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (1996). Implementing service learning in higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 67(2), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1996.11780257;SUBPAGE:STRING:ACCESS
  7. Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the Reading Wars: Reading Acquisition From Novice to Expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51.
  8. Chen, Y. T., & Chuang, M. C. (2014). The study of tactile feeling and It’s expressing vocabulary. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 44(5), 675–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ERGON.2014.07.003
  9. Connolly, K. (2014). Multisensory perception as an associative learning process. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(SEP), 110603. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2014.01095/TEXT
  10. Crompton, H., Edmett, A., Ichaporia, N., & Burke, D. (2024). AI and English Language Teaching: Affordances and Challenges. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(6), 2503–2529. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13460
  11. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. Learning Policy Institute.
  12. Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199.
  13. Dessemontet, R. S., Martinet, C., de Chambrier, A.-F., Martini-Willemin, B.-M., & Audrin, C. (2019). A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of phonics instruction for teaching decoding skills to students with intellectual disability. Educational Research Review, 26, 52–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.01.001
  14. Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(2), 167–188.
  15. Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Stahl, S. A., & Willows, D. M. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the national reading panel’s meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 393–447.
  16. Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Willows, D. M., Schuster, B. V., Yaghoub‐Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic Awareness Instruction Helps Children Learn to Read: Evidence From the National Reading Panel’s Meta‐Analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(3), 250–287.
  17. Guay, F., Gilbert, W., Falardeau, É., Bradet, R., & Boulet, J. (2020). Fostering the use of pedagogical practices among teachers to support elementary students’ motivation to write. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 63, 101922. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEDPSYCH.2020.101922
  18. Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3), 381–391.
  19. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & VonSecker, C. (2000). Effects of integrated instruction on motivation and strategy use in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 331–341. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.331
  20. Jacoby, B. (2015). Learning Service- essentials. Jossey Bass.
  21. Kurywczak, J. (1997). The Effect of the Tactile Modality on Retention of Sight Vocabulary.
  22. Mesmer, H. A. E., & Griffith, P. L. (2005). Everybody’s Selling It-But Just What Is Explicit, Systematic Phonics Instruction? The Reading Teacher, 59(4), 366–376.
  23. Nation, I. S. P. (2022). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009093873
  24. Pressley, M., Wharton-McDonald, R., Allington, R., Block, C. C., Morrow, L., Tracey, D., Baker, K., Brooks, G., Cronin, J., Nelson, E., & Woo, D. (2001). A Study of Effective First-Grade Literacy Instruction. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(1), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0501_2
  25. Quiroz, B. G., Snow, C. E., & Zhao, J. (2010). Vocabulary skills of Spanish-English bilinguals: Impact of mother-child language interactions and home language and literacy support. International Journal of Bilingualism, 14(4), 379–399.
  26. Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579–595. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032690
  27. Sakamoto, M., & Watanabe, J. (2017). Exploring tactile perceptual dimensions using materials associated with sensory vocabulary. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(APR), 250102.
  28. Schmeichel, B. J. (2007). Attention control, memory updating, and emotion regulation temporarily reduce the capacity for executive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(2), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.241
  29. Shams, L., & Seitz, A. R. (2008). Benefits of multisensory learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.006
  30. Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1999). Language and Literacy Environments in Preschools. ERIC Digest.
  31. Torgesen, J. K. (2002). The Prevention of Reading Difficulties. Journal of School Psychology, 40(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(01)00092-9
  32. Vrieling-Teunter, E., Henderikx, M., Nadolski, R., & Kreijns, K. (2022). Facilitating Peer Interaction Regulation in Online Settings: The Role of Social Presence, Social Space and Sociability. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 793798.
  33. Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2002 9:4, 9(4), 625–636. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196322
  34. Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: a psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3