Main Article Content

Abstract

MSMEs have a vital role in Indonesian economy and capital is a central issue for them. However, there are still many MSMEs that struggle to grow despite various programs that are instigated to assist this sector. This study aims to provide evidence of mismatch between capital needs/preferences and use for MSMEs. We call that mismatch financing gap. The financing gap was identified through analyses of various MSMEs and owner’s characteristics that affecting preference and use of financing sources by MSMEs. Questionnaires were distributed to MSMEs owners in Magelang City and 121 samples were collected. One-way Anova and Independent t-test were utilized to determine financing sources preferred by MSMEs across different owners and MSMEs characteristics. The output showed that MSMEs at different levels of growth and owners who have different levels of education and experience had different preferences toward bank debt. Furthermore, preference to government assistance and informal sources of financing were driven by MSMEs’ sales and owner’s motivation to start business, respectively. Multiple regression analysis was employed to determine the drivers of MSMEs’ use of financing sources. The results of this study were ownership status, gender, acquisition mode, and education influenced the use of bank loans. Assistance from the government was affected by MSMEs’ type of activity, sales, and experience of the MSMEs’ owners. The use of informal financing sources was affected by motivation and experience of MSMEs’ owners.

Keywords

MSMEs capital structure financing gap organizational characteristics

Article Details

Author Biographies

Diah Agustina Prihastiwi, Universitas Tidar

Academic Profile: Google Scholar, Sinta, Researchgate

Suci Nasehati Sunaningsih, Universitas Tidar

Academic Profile: Google Scholar, Sinta, Researchgate, Linkedin

Agustina Prativi Nugraheni, Universitas Tidar

Academic Profile: Google Scholar, Sinta

References

  1. Abdullah, M. A., Manan, A., & Khadijah, S. (2011). Small and Medium Enterprises and Their Financing Patterns: Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Economic Cooperation & Development, 32(2), 1-18.
  2. Ardiani, W., & Putra, R. (2018). Pengaruh Karakteristik Wirausaha Dan Pemberian Dana Bergulir Terhadap Kinerja UMKM: (Studi Pada Umkm Desa Denai Lama Kabupaten Deli Serdang). Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 3(1), 50–59.
  3. Belas, J., Kljucnikov, A., Vojtovic, S., & Sobeková-Májková, M. (2015). Approach of the SME entrepreneurs to financial risk management in relation to gender and level of education. Economics & Sociology, 8(4), 32-42.
  4. Bhagas, A., & Handayani, H. R. (2016). Analisis Pengaruh Modal, Jumlah Tenaga Kerja, Teknologi dan Bantuan Pemerintah terhadap Pendapatan Usaha Mikro Kecil dan Menengah (Studi Kasus UMKM Sulampita di Kota Semarang) [Other, Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis, Universitas Diponegoro]. http://eprints.undip.ac.id/49498/
  5. Borgia, D., & Newman, A. (2012). The influence of managerial factors on the capital structure of small and medium-sized enterprises in emerging economies. Journal of Chinese Entrepreneurship, 4(3), 180–205.
  6. Forte, D., Barros, L. A., & Nakamura, W. T. (2013). Determinants of the Capital Structure of Small and Medium Sized Brazilian Enterprises. Brazilian Administration Review; Rio de Janeiro, 10(3), 347–369.
  7. Ismanto, H., & Diman, T. (2014). Analisis Efektivitas Pemberian Pinjaman Program Pembiayaan UMKM oleh Koperasi. Jurnal Economia, 10(2), 148-164.
  8. Kent Baker, H., Kumar, S., & Rao, P. (2017). Financing preferences and practices of Indian SMEs. Global Finance Journal, 100388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.10.003
  9. Kumar, S., & Rao, P. (2016). Financing patterns of SMEs in India during 2006 to 2013–an empirical analysis. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 28(2), 97–131.
  10. Mac an Bhaird, C., Vidal, J. S., & Lucey, B. (2016). Discouraged borrowers: Evidence for Eurozone SMEs. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 44, 46–55.
  11. Masiak, C., Block, J. H., Moritz, A., Lang, F., & Kraemer-Eis, H. (2019). How do micro firms differ in their financing patterns from larger SMEs? Venture Capital, 21(4), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2019.1569333
  12. Mulyani, H., & Mulyadi, A. (2019). Community-based MSMEs (Micro, Small, Medium Enterprises) Financing Model to Increase Bussiness Independence. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Economics, Business, Entrepreneurship, and Finance (ICEBEF 2018). Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Economics, Business, Entrepreneurship, and Finance (ICEBEF 2018), Bandung, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2991/icebef-18.2019.11
  13. Nainggolan, R., & Nainggolan, R. (2016). Gender, Tingkat Pendidikan dan Lama Usaha sebagai Determinan Penghasilan UMKM Kota Surabaya. KINERJA, 20(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.24002/kinerja.v20i1.693
  14. Narsa, I. M., Widodo, A., & Kurnianto, S. (2012). Mengungkap Kesiapan UMKM dalam Implementasi Standar Akuntansi Keuangan Entitas Tanpa Akuntabilitas Publik (PSAK-ETAP) untukk Meningkatkan Akses Modal Perbankan. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Airlangga (JEBA)/Journal of Economics and Business Airlangga, 22(3), 11.
  15. Natasya, V., & Hardiningsih, P. (2021). Kebijakan Pemerintah Sebagai Solusi Meningkatkan Pengembangan UMKM di Masa Pandemi. Ekonomis: Journal of Economics and Business, 5(1), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.33087/ekonomis.v5i1.317
  16. Nguyen, N., & Luu, N. (2013, February 15). Determinants of Financing Pattern and Access to Formal -Informal Credit: The Case of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises in Viet Nam [MPRA Paper]. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/81868/
  17. Nuraini, R. A., & Setiartiti, L. (2017). Strategi Pengembangan Kota Magelang sebagai Kawasan Andalan di Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Ekonomi & Studi Pembangunan, 18(2), 173-182. https://doi.org/10.18196/jesp.18.2.4048
  18. Nuswandari, C. (2013). Determinan struktur modal dalam perspektif pecking order theory dan agency theory. Dinamika Akuntansi Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 2(1), 92-102.
  19. Rahmawati, T., & Puspasari, O. R. (2017). Implementasi SAK ETAP dan Kualitas Laporan Keuangan UMKM terkait Akses Modal Perbankan. Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi, 1(1), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.33603/jka.v1i1.510
  20. Ramdhansyah, R., & Silalahi, S. A. (2013). Pengembangan Model Pendanaan UMKM Berdasarkan Persepsi UMKM. Jurnal Keuangan & Bisnis Program Studi Magister Manajemen Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Harapan, 5(1), 30–40.
  21. Saragih, I. P. (2015). Analisis Pengaruh Modal Sendiri dan Modal Pinjaman Kredit Usaha Rakyat (KUR) terhadap Pendapatan Pengusaha UMKM Kabupaten Toba Samosir (Studi Kasus: PT Bank Sumut Cabang Balige). Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan, 3(7), 15.
  22. Serrasqueiro, Z., & Caetano, A. (2015). Trade-Off Theory versus Pecking Order Theory: Capital structure decisions in a peripheral region of Portugal. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 16(2), 445–466.
  23. Serrasqueiro, Z., & Nunes, P. M. (2012). Is age a determinant of SMEs’ financing decisions? Empirical evidence using panel data models. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(4), 627–654.
  24. Sunarjanto, N. A., & Roida, H. Y. (2013, 24 Oktober). Menterjemahkan Toleransi Risiko Pemilik UMKM Melalui Keputusan Penggunaan Modal yang Mengandung Risiko Bisnis dan Risiko Keuangan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional & Call For Paper Forum Manajemen Indonesia (FMI) Ke-5. Seminar Nasional & Call For Paper Forum Manajemen Indonesia (FMI) ke-5, Fakultas Ekonomi Tanjungpura.
  25. Susilo, Y. S. (2010). Peran Perbankan dalam Pembiayaan UMKM di Provinsi DIY. Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan PERBANKAN, 14(3), 467–478.
  26. Woldie, A., & Ubrurhe, U. (2018). Small and Medium Enterprises’ Challenges of Accessing Microfinance in Nigeria. Financial Entrepreneurship for Economic Growth in Emerging Nations, 229–253. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2700-8.ch012
  27. Wu, J., Song, J., & Zeng, C. (2008). An empirical evidence of small business financing in China. Management Research News, 31(12), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170810920666