Main Article Content


This research aims to examine the determination of the Environmental Management System (EMS) and environmental performance on the company's financial performance as moderated by foreign ownership in the stock structure of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. This research uses a quantitative method by analyzing 27 manufacturing companies listed on the IDX through purposive sampling-based sample selection, then data analysis using the moderated regression analysis method. The results showed that foreign ownership could not moderate the effect of EMS proxied by ISO 14001 certification on the financial performance of the entity proxied by ROA, but on the other hand, the structure of foreign ownership shares could positively and significantly moderate the effect of environmental performance proxied by PROPER KLHK. on the entity's financial performance. Meanwhile, if tested directly, neither EMS nor environmental performance has an effect on the company's financial performance.


ISO 14001 PROPER KLHK ROA Foreign Ownership EMS

Article Details

Author Biographies

Berwin Anggara, Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia

Academic Profile : Google ScholarSinta, Linkedin

Vera Apri Dina Safitri, Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia

Academic Profile : N/A

Isbahna Naz

Academic Profile : N/A


  1. Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500.
  2. Albornoz, F., Cole, M. A., Elliott, R. J. R., & Ercolani, M. (2011). In Search of Environmental Spillovers. SSRN Electronic Journal.
  3. Angelia, D., & Suryaningsih, R. (2015). The Effect of Environmental Performance And Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Towards Financial Performance (Case Study to Manufacture, Infrastructure, And Service Companies That Listed At Indonesia Stock Exchange). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, 348–355.
  4. Arvitariani, Y., & Wahidahwati. (2018). Pengaruh Kinerja Lingkungan Dan Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Dengan Foreign …. Jurnal Ilmu dan Riset Akuntansi (JIRA …, 7(5).
  5. Dewi, M., & Suaryana, I. (2015). Pengaruh Profitabilitas Dan Kepemilikan Asing Pada Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 13(1), 84–98.
  6. Elkington. (1999). Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business. In Choice Reviews Online (Vol. 36, Nomor 07). New Society Publishers.
  7. Ferron, R. T., Funchal, B., Nossa, V., & Teixeira, A. J. C. (2012). Is ISO 14001 certification effective? An experimental analysis of firm profitability. BAR - Brazilian Administration Review, 9(SPL. ISS), 78–94.
  8. Freeman, S., & Cavusgil, S. T. (1984). Strategic management. A stakeholder approach. In Journal of International Marketing (Vol. 15, Nomor 4). Pitman.
  9. Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS IBM SPSS 25 Update PLS Regresi (9 ed.). BP UNDIP.
  10. Gitman, L., Smith Beaumont, M., Hall, J., Makina, D., Malan, M., Marx, J., Mestry, R., Ngwenya, S., & Strydom, B. (2015). Principles of Managerial Finance: Global and Southern African Perspectives.
  11. Gujarati, N. D & Porter, D. C. (2013). Dasar-dasar Eko-nometrika. In Buku 1 dan Buku 2 Edisi 5.
  12. Hazudin, S. F., Mohamad, S. A., Azer, I., Daud, R., & Paino, H. (2015). ISO 14001 and Financial Performance: Is the Accreditation Financially Worth It for Malaysian Firms. Procedia Economics and Finance, 31, 56–61.
  13. He, J. (2010). What is the role of openness for China’s aggregate industrial SO2 emission?: A structural analysis based on the Divisia decomposition method. Ecological Economics, 69(4), 868–886.
  14. Johnstone, N., & Labonne, J. (2009). Why do manufacturing facilities introduce environmental management systems? Improving and/or signaling performance. Ecological Economics, 68(3), 719–730.
  15. Kemenlhk, P. (2019). Proper - Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. KEMENTRIAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP DAN KEHUTANAN.
  16. Lundgren, T., & Marklund, P.-O. (2012). Environmental Performance and Profits. SSRN Electronic Journal.
  17. Media Indonesia. (2018). Program PROPER Sebagai Penggerak Pencapaian “SDGs.”
  18. Nababan, L. M., & Hasyir, D. A. (2019). Pengaruh Environmental Cost dan Environmental Performance Terhadap Financial Performance (Studi Kasus pada Perusahaan Sektor Pertambangan Peserta PROPER Periode 2012 – 2016). E-Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana, 259.
  19. Prakash, A., & Potoski, M. (2007). Investing up: FDI and the cross-country diffusion of ISO 14001 management systems. International Studies Quarterly, 51(3), 723–744.
  20. Qi, G. Y., Zeng, S. X., Tam, C. M., Yin, H. T., Wu, J. F., & Dai, Z. H. (2011). Diffusion of ISO 14001 environmental management systems in China: Rethinking on stakeholders’ roles. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(11), 1250–1256.
  21. Sarumapet, S. (2005). The Relationship Between Environmental Performance and Financial Performance of Indonesian Companies. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 7(2), 89–98.
  22. Singh, D., & Jackson, L. A. (2015). Towards Mapping Environmental Performance and Financial Performance. Delhi Business Review, 16(1), 21–30.
  23. Sinkin, C., Wright, C. J., & Burnett, R. D. (2008). Eco-efficiency and firm value. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27(2), 167–176.
  24. Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374.
  25. Stigson, B., Madden, K., Young, R., Brady, K., & Hall, J. (2006). Eco-efficiency Learning Module. World Business Council for Sustainable Development(WBCSD), 231.