Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 296 Download : 255

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Patent protection in Indonesia today still leaves various problems, both practical (implementation) and conceptual (acceptance by the public). While, the Indonesian government took a place to settle the issues on the patent by revoked the provision on the Patent Law into the Omnibus Law Number 11 of 2020 on Job Creation (UU Cipta Kerja). The purpose of this research is to analyse the enactment of Omnibus Law (UU Cipta Kerja) as the revocation of Article 20 of Law Number 13 of 2016 concerning Patents. This research is dogmatic research with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. This research found that, the law plays a very important role in the life of the state, therefore ideally every law enforced must reflect (rechtside) and the national ideals (staatside) of the Indonesian nation. This is in the context of realizing social justice, fostering a united society, realizing just material and spiritual welfare, and achieving a proportional balance. The abolition of the content of Article 20 of the 2016 Patent Law in the Job Creation Law actually contains the assumption of an oligarchic interest in it

Keywords

Omnibus Law Job Creation Law Revocation Patents

Article Details

References

  1. Azanella, L. A. (2019). Apa Itu Omnibus Law, yang Disinggung Jokowi dalam Pidatonya? kompas.com.
  2. Darma Pertiwi, E. (2022). Pelindungan Hak Akses Kesehatan Atas Perubahan Ketentuan Lisensi-Wajib Dalam Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 7(1), 100–113. https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol7.iss1.art8
  3. Frenki, F. (2011). Politik hukum dan perannya dalam pembangunan hukum di indonesia pasca reformasi. Jurnal Asas, 3(No 2 Juli 2011), 1–8.
  4. Maskus, K. E. (2009). Patents right and international technology transfer through foreign direct investment. Cambridge University Press.
  5. Masnun, M. A., & Roszana, D. (2019). Persoalan Pengaturan Kewajiban Pemegang Paten untuk Membuat Produk atau Menggunakan Proses di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 26(2), 326–348. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss2.art6
  6. Mia Kusuma Fitriana. (2015). Peranan Politik Hukum Dalam pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia Sebagai Sarana Mewujudkan Tujuan Negara. Konstitusi, 1(1), 1–27.
  7. Shidarta, S. (2020). Bernard Arief Sidharta: Dari Pengembanan Hukum Teoretis ke Pembentukan Ilmu Hukum Nasional Indonesia. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 3(2), 441–476. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.3.2.441-476
  8. Sopiani, S., & Mubaraq, Z. (2020). Politik Hukum Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Pasca Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 17(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v17i2.623
  9. Syaukani, I., & Thohari, A. A. (2015). Dasar-Dasar Politik Hukum. Rajawali Press.
  10. Tobing, J. J., Sudirman, L., Law, F., & Batam, U. I. (2022a). Conditional Unconstitutional Omnibus Law : The Implications on Patent Regulation. 5(2021), 325–339.
  11. Tobing, J. J., Sudirman, L., Law, F., & Batam, U. I. (2022b). CONDITIONAL UNCONSTITUTIONAL OMNIBUS LAW : THE IMPLICATIONS ON PATENT REGULATION Humans have been gifted minds by God to utilize their intellect . One e-Journal Komunikasi Yustisia Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha have a significant and strategic role in pu. E-Journal Komunikasi Yustisia Universitas, 5(1), 325–339.
  12. Trimble, M. (2016). Patent working requirements: Historical and comparative perspectives. UC Irvine L. Rev., 6, 483–508.