Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 862 Download : 819

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This paper analyzes the forms of negotiation and contestation of religious practices Transvestites in Yogyakarta. The issue of Transvestites has become a hot conversation in the Indonesian public space and has led to multiple interpretations of the Transvestites identity’s position in the eyes of the law, religion, and society. So, it becomes significant to see how the negotiation and contestation of the Islamic religious practices among Transvestites. This study was conducted through field studies by conducting in-depth interviews and relevant literature search both online and offline. The results indicate that the Contestation of Islamic practices among Transvestites occurs in the form of interpretation of the Quranic texts, families and community organizations. To strengthen its existence, transvestites carried out many negotiations mainly related to the Islamic practice. Negotiations are carried out through various activities such as holding regular recitations, engaging in discussion forums and social activities in the community and interpreting the Quranic verse with a dehumanization approach to Islamic law. Besides, the support of religious leaders and the Legal Aid Institute further strengthens its authority in the community.

Keywords

Contestation Negotiation Transvestites Religious Practices

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Al-Jurhuzi, A. bin S. 1965. Al-Mawahib al-Samiyyah. Surabaya: Al-Hidayah.
  2. Al-Jurjani. tt. Al-Ta’rifat, al-Maktabah al-Syamilah. Ridwana Media.
  3. Al-Qurthubi, S. I. 2009. Al Jami’li Ahkam Al-Qur’an (Terj. Fathurrahman Abdul Hamid). Jakarta: Pustaka Azzam.
  4. Al-Suyuthi, J. 1965. Al-Asybah wa al-Nadzair. Surabaya: Al-Hidayah.
  5. Ar-Rifa’i, M. N. 2012. Kemudahan Dari Allah: Ringkasan Tafsir Ibnu Katsir (III). Jakarta: Gema Insani.
  6. Ath-Thabari, A. J. M. bin J. 1978. Tafsir al-Thabari. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.
  7. Ayu, N. 2018. Wawancara Penelitian dengan Santri Pondok Pesantren Waria Al-Fatah Yogyakarta.
  8. Beta, A. R. 2014. Hijabers: How Young Urban Muslim Women Redefine Themselves in Indonesia. International Communication Gazette, 76(4–5), 377–389.
  9. Geertz, C. 1983. Abangan, Santri, Priyanyi dalam Masyarakat Jawa. Jakarta: Dunia Pustaka Jaya.
  10. Ritzer, G.-D. J. G. 2004. Teori Sosiologi Moderen. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
  11. Habermas, J., Lennox, S., & Lennox, F. 1964. The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article. Durham: Duke University Press.
  12. Hafsi, N. 2014. “Ruang Publik Virtual: Ruang yang Diperebutkan.” Presented at the Conference on Communication, Culture, and Media Studies, Yogyakarta: Universitas Islam Indonesia.
  13. Harahap, R. D. K. A. 2016. LGBT DI Indonesia: Perspektif Hukum Islam, HAM, Psikologi dan Pendekatan Maslahah. Jurnal Al-Ahkam, 6(2), 223–247.
  14. Hirschkind, C. 2006. The Ethical Soundscape: Cassette Sermons and Islamic Counter-Publics. New York: Colombia University Press.
  15. Kailani, N. 2012. Forum Lingkar Pena and Muslim Youth in contemporary Indonesia. Review of Indonesian and Malaysian Affairs, 46(1), 33–53.
  16. Mahmood, S. 2005. Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  17. Majelis Ulama Indonesia. 2011. Himpunan Fatwa MUI Sejak 1975. Jakarta: Erlangga.
  18. Manzur, I. tt. Lisan al-’Arab, al-Maktabah al-Syamilah. Ridawana Media.
  19. Mulia, M. 2010. Islam dan Hak Asasi Manusia, Konsep dan Implementasi. Yogyakarta: Naufan Pustaka.
  20. Muttaqin, I. 2016. Membaca Strategi Eksistensi LGBT Di Indonesia. Jurnal Studi Gender dan Anak, 3(1), 78–86.
  21. Neuman, W. L. 2014. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (7. ed., Pearson new internet). Harlow: Pearson.
  22. Nisa, E. F. 2018. Creative and Lucrative Daʿwa: The Visual Culture of Instagram amongst Female Muslim Youth in Indonesia. Asiascape: Digital Asia, 5(1–2), 68–99.
  23. NU.or.id. 2016. Resmi, PBNU Sikapi Perilaku Seksual Menyimpang LGBT. Retrieved from http://www.nu.or.id/post/read/66045/resmi-pbnu-sikapi-perilaku-seksual-menyimpang-lgbt.
  24. Nurhidayati, T. 2010. Kehidupan Keagamaan Kaum Santri Waria Di Pesantren Waria Al-Fatah Senin-Kamis Notoyudan Yogyakarta. Jurnal Falasifa, 1(1), 59–74.
  25. Prasetyo, A. G. 2012. Menuju Demokrasi Rasional: Melacak Pemikiran Jurgen Habermas tentang Ruang Publik. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 16(2), 169–185.
  26. Republika.co.id. 2018. Isu LGBT yang Kembali Menggelinding. Retrieved from https://www.republika.co.id/berita/nasional/news-analysis/18/01/21/p2vxhz282-isu-lgbt-yang-kembali-menggelinding.
  27. Ratri, Shinta. 2018a. Wawancara Penelitian dengan Pimpinan Pondok Pesantren Waria Al-Fatah Yogyakarta.
  28. Ratri, Shinta. 2018b. Wawancara Penelitian dengan Pimpinan Pondok Pesantren Waria Al-Fatah Yogyakarta.
  29. Safri, A. N. 2016. Penerimaan Keluarga Terhadap Waria atau Transgender (Studi Kasus Atas Waria/Transgender Di Pesantren Waria Al-Fatah Yogyakarta). Jurnal Nizham, 5(1), 26–41.
  30. Sakai, M. 2010. Ethical Self-Improvement in Everyday Life: Propagating the Islamic Way of Life in Globalised Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate. net/profile/Minako_Sakai/publication/228995456_Ethical_Self-Improvement_in_ Everyday_Life_Propagating_the_Islamic_Way_of_Life_in_Globalised_Indonesia
  31. Schielke, S. 2009. Being Good in Ramadan: Ambivalence, Fragmentation, and the Moral Self in the Lives of Young Egyptians. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 15, 24–40.
  32. Schielke, S. 2010. Second Thoughts about the Anthropology of Islam, or how to make sense of grand schemes in everyday life. ZMO Working Paper, 2, 1–16.
  33. Shihab, M. Q. 2002. Tafsir Al-Misbah: Pesan, Kesan dan Keserasian al_Quran. Jakarta: Lentera Hati.
  34. Soekanto, S., & Sulistyowati, B. 2006. Sosiologi Pengantar. Jakarta: CV. Rajawali.
  35. Suara Muhammadiyah. 2018. Haedar Nashir : Agama dan Pancasila, Alasan Mengapa LGBT Tidak Bisa Dilegalkan. Retrieved from http://www.suaramuhammadiyah.id/2018/02/05/haedar-nashir-agama-dan-pancasila-alasan-mengapa-lgbt-tidak-bisa-dilegalkan/.
  36. Sugiyono. 2013. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  37. Suseno, F. M. 2002. Agama, Humanisme dan Masa Depan Tuhan. Yogyakarta: Basis.
  38. Syari’ati, A. 1996. Humanisme: Antara Islam dan Madzhab Barat. (A. Muhammad, Trans.). Bandung: Pustaka Hidayah.
  39. Wimmer, R. & Dominick, J. 2014. Mass Media Research an Introduction. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.
  40. Zuhdi. 1991. Masijfuk Masa’il Fiqhiyyah. Jakarta: CV. Haji Masagung.