Article Sidebar

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 1117 Download : 991

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study examines the approach used by Frederick M. Denny who is an outsider researcher about the religious behavior of Muslim communities. The method used is the library method. Meanwhile, the primary source used as a data source is the writing of F. M. Denny's in Richard C. Martin's anthology book. This study found that the approach used by Frederick. M. Denny in understanding the religious behavior of Muslim societies is a sociological approach by distinguishing rituals in Islam into two, namely official and popular rituals. Through this approach, Denny concluded that outside of official worship, in Islam there were also additional rituals performed by Muslim communities. The difference is that these additional rituals are local and vary by region

Keywords

Frederick M. Denny Muslim Outsider Pendekatan Sosiologis Perilaku Keagamaan

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Abdulloh, M. T. & Karim, M. R. (1990). Metodologi Penelitian Agama. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
  2. Azra, A. (2002). Historiografi Islam Kontemporer: Wacana, Aktualitas, dan Aktor Sejarah. Jakarta: Gramedia.
  3. Djidin, M. & Syamsuddin, S. (2019). Two Indonesian Critical Commentaries on Caliphate Based on Qur’an, 2: 30-38. Al Jami`ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 57(1), 25-50.
  4. Hidayat, F. (2018). Islamic Building: Konstruksi Dasar dalam Bangunan Studi Islam. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Senja.
  5. Husaini, A. (2011). Islam Agama Wahyu bukan Agama Sejarah. Jakarta: INSIST.
  6. Iwanebel, F. Y. (2019). Gerakan Keagamaan dan Identitas Kultural Masjid Jendral Sudirman Yogyakarta. Jurnal Ibda`, 17(1), 1-13.
  7. Kuntowijoyo. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
  8. Mahmud & Suntana, I. (2002). Antropologi Pendidikan. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
  9. Martin, R. C. (2002). Pendekatan Kajian Islam dalam Studi Agama. Surakarta: Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
  10. Nata, A. (1997). Metodologi Studi Islam. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
  11. Qamar, S. W. (2015). Kritik Makna Islam Perspektif Orientalis dan Liberal. Jurnal Kalimah, 13(1), 157-177.
  12. Rifa`i, A. S. (2019). Kebenaran dan Keraguan dalam Studi Agama. Jurnal Penelitian Agama, 20(1), 95-109.
  13. Said, E. (2000). Penjungkirbalikan Dunia Islam. terj. Asep Hikmat. Bandung: Penerbit Pustaka.
  14. Sari, D. A. (2019). Makna Agama dalam Kehidupan Modern. Cakrawala: Jurnal Studi Islam, 14(1), 16-23.
  15. Susanto, E. (2019). The Puritanism of the Progressive Traditionalism: Dynamics of Religious Life in Madura in Perspective on Conflict Theory of Lewis Coser. At Tahrir: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 18(2), 415-437.
  16. Toynbee, A. (2007). Sejarah Umat Manusia: Uraian Analisis, Kronologis, Naratif, dan Kronologis. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  17. Turner, B. S. (2013). Sosiologi Agama. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.