Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 965 Download : 597

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The WTO Conference held in Hong Kong in 2005 agreed that subsidies must be immediately abolished by each WTO member country. But the decision was not approved by many countries, especially developing countries and less developed countries, so the concept of Special and Differential Treatment appears. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the extent of this idea's impact on the small-scale fisheries in Indonesia after the Buenos Aires Conference. a normative juridical research method is used by authors that examining library materials and other secondary materials. The author uses the data collection method by the literature study. Documents in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and non-legal materials are used in this paper. At the Ministerial Meeting in Buenos Aires in 2017 Special and Differential Treatment Concept was discussed. The result of this study found that regarding of conclusion in the 11th Ministerial Conference in Buenos Aires, Indonesia has a chance to protect their small-scale fisheries interest to continue to provide subsidies in the field of fisheries. However, Indonesia still has a lot of work to be done to develop disciplines of fisheries subsidies within the framework of cooperation at the WTO and prevent the misuse of subsidies provided.

Keywords

Buenos Aires Conference Subsidies Small Scale Fisheries Special and Differential Treatment

Article Details

References

  1. Ali, J., et al. (2017). The Contribution of Subsidies on the Welfare of Fishing Communities in Malaysia. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 7(2), 641-648.
  2. Barutu, C. (2007). Ketentuan Anti-Dumping, Subsidi dan Tindakan Pengamanan (Safeguard) dalam GATT dan WTO. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
  3. Bossche, P.V.D. (2005). The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization: Text, Cases, and Materials. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Bossche, P.V.D., et al. (2010). Pengantar Hukum WTO. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
  5. Chakrabotry, D., et al. (2011). Doha Round Negotiations on Subsidy and Countervailing Measures: Potential Implications on Trade Flows in the Fishery Sector. Asian Journal of WTO & International Health Law and Policy, 6(1), 201-234.
  6. Garcia, F.J. (2000). Trade and Inequality: Economic Justice and The Developing World. Michigan Journal of International Law, 21(4), 975-1049.
  7. Garcia, F.J., et al. (2016). Reforming the International Investment Regime: Lessons from International Trade Law. Journal of International Economic Law, 18(4), December 2015, 861–892. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgv042
  8. Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan Republik Indonesia. (2016). Laporan Kinerja KKP 2016. KKP, 42.
  9. Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan Republik Indonesia. (2018). Refleksi Tahun 2017 & Outlook Tahun 2018. Direktorat Jenderal Penguatan Daya Saing Produk Kelautan dan Perikanan, 7.
  10. Koalisi Rakyat untuk Keadilan Perikanan (KIARA). (2013). Selamatkan Pesisir Laut Indonesia, Sejahterakan Nelayan. Buletin Kabar Bahari 4th Edition, 12-17.
  11. Neufeld, B. (2017). Freedom, Money and Justice as Fairness. Politics, Philosophy & Economics Journal, 16(1), 70-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X16651058
  12. Nicita, A., Marcelo Olarreaga, Peri Silva. (2018). Cooperation in WTO’s Tariff Waters?. Journal of Political Economy, 126(3), 1302-1338. https://doi.org/10.1086/697085
  13. Nur, M. (2019). Bridging a new concept of fisheries subsidies policy to support sustainable fisheries in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/370/1/012056
  14. Putra, H.T., and Aqimuddin, E.A. (2014). Pengaturan Subsidi Perikanan dalam WTO dan Dampaknya bagi Indonesia. Mimbar Hukum. 26(3). 395-408. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16025
  15. Ruitinga, V. (2011). Ideal Theory and Utopia. Erasmus Student Journal of Philosophy, 1, 48-54.
  16. Sulaiman, et al. (2014). Pembangunan Hukum Perlindungan Nelayan Tradisional di Aceh dalam Kaitan Pemanfaatan Sumber Daya Perikanan Secara Berkeadilan. Jurnal Media Hukum, 21(2), 309-321.
  17. UNEP and WWF. (2009). Summary Report: The WTO Fishery Subsidies Negotiations: Update and Introductory Briefing for New Delegates. Geneva: WTO.
  18. Westlund, L. (2004). Guide for Identifying, Assessing, and Reporting on Subsidies in the Fisheries Sector. Roma: FAO.