Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 425 Download : 466

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to identify the value of Pancasila justice related to labor in the Job Creation Law. The method used in this research is a normative juridical method through a statutory and conceptual approach. The legal materials used are the 1945 Constitution and Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Labor (Labor Law) compared to the Omnibus Law, which also regulates Labor. The results showed that the issuance of the Job Creation Law caused many losses for workers/laborers in providing wages, eliminating the right to wages, severance pay, compensation for rights, and compensation for workers/laborers. In addition, there is a lost right in suing an employer if a worker does not receive a layoff because of serious mistakes. Finally, employers who do not include pension workers in the pension program cannot be prosecuted. Amendments to the Job Creation Law must be made considering that laws must be made based on Pancasila justice. In current conditions, workers' rights are being erased so that the Job Creation Law is considered to only favor employers.

Keywords

Workers Work termination Job Creation Law

Article Details

References

  1. Andri Fransiskus Gultom, Marsianus Reresi. “Kritik Warga Pada RUU Omnibus Law Dalam Paradigma Critical Legal Studies.” Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan 10, no. 1 (2020): 38–47.
  2. Ani Sri Rahayu. “Omnibus Law Cipta Kerja Atau Cipta Cilaka?,” 2020.
  3. Benuf, Kornelius, Muhamad Azhar. “Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer.” Gema Keadilan 7, no. 1 (2020): 20–33.
  4. Despian Nurhidayat. “Tolak RUU Cipta Kerja, KSPI: Buruh Akan Lakukan Aksi Besar.” Media Indonesia, 2020.
  5. Fajar Kurniawan. “Problematika Pembentukan RUU Cipta Kerja Dengan Konsep Omnibus Law Pada Klaster Ketenagakerjaan Pasal 89 Angka 45 Tentang Pemberian Pesangon Kepada Pekerja Yang Di PHK.” Jurnal Panorama Hukum 5, no. 1 (2020): 63–76.
  6. Ihsanuddin. “Mengenal Omnibus Law, Aturan ‘Sapu Jagat’ Yang Ditolak Buruh.” Nasional Kompas. Jakarta, 2020.
  7. Kadek Agus Sudiarawan. “Pengaturan Prinsip Transfer of Undertaking Protection of Employment (TUPE) Dalam Dunia Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia (Di Antara Potensi Dan Hambatan).” Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana 4, no. 4 (2015): 796–804.
  8. Lalu Husni. Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2010.
  9. Lita Tyesta A.L.W., Anis Mahdurohatun, Adhi Budi Susilo, Agustinus Yosi Setyawan. Perancangan Hukum Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan (Teori Dan Teknik). I. Yogyakarta: CV. MAHATA (Magna Raharja Tama), 2020.
  10. Mila Karmila Adi. “Masa Depan Arbitrase Sebagai Mekanisme Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 17, no. 2 (2010): 295–316.
  11. Muhamad Azhar. Buku Ajar Ketenagakerjaan. Semarang: UNDIP Pres, 2015.
  12. Rohendra Fathammubina, Rani Apriani. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Sepihak Bagi Pekerja.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum De’Jure: Kajian Ilmiah Hukum 3, no. 1 (2018): 108–30.
  13. Sentot Sudarwanto, Dona Budi Kharisma AL. “Omnibus Law Dan Izin Lingkungan Dalam Konteks Pembangunan Berkelanjutan.” Jurnal Rechtsvinding 9, no. 1 (2020): 109–23.
  14. Soemitro. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Dan Jurimetri. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1998.
  15. tirto.id. “BPS Catat Pengangguran per Februari 2020 Capai 6,88 Juta Orang.” 2020.
  16. Willy Farianto. “Penerapan PHK Karena Kesalahan Berat Pasca Putusan MK.” Hukum Online. 2020.
  17. Zaeni Asyhadie. Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Bidang Hubungan Kerja. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2007.