Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 423 Download : 358

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The accountability of regional heads is one of the benchmarks for the success of development and regional autonomy. This study aims to analyze the accountability of regional heads in each law. The research method used is a normative juridical method with a statutory approach based on a study of statutory regulations related to this research topic. The results showed that the accountability of regional heads in Law Number 5 of 1974 is not regulated. However, the characteristics of the new post-reform decentralization order by a centralized government were marked by the enactment of Law Number 22 the Year 1999. The DPR elects regional heads based on accountability. In addition, regional heads can be dismissed by the DPR if their accountability report (LPJ) is rejected, which in turn creates political instability. It is also due to the absence of a parallel position between the regional head and the DPRD.

Keywords

Local Government Regional Head of Performance Accountability Decentralization

Article Details

References

  1. Afnila. Pemerintah Daerah Dalam Kerangka UU No.5 Tahun 1974 Dan UU No 22 Tahun 1999. Medan: USU Press, 2005.
  2. Astomo, Putra. “Good Governance Princuples in Running Governance.” Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 16, no. 64 (2014): 401–20.
  3. Bayu Aji, Alan. “Implikasi Politik Hukum Pengaturan Pertanggungjawaban Kinerja Kepala Daerah Pasca Reformasi.” Jurnal Lex Renaissance 2, no. 3 (2017): 231–58.
  4. Hari Susanto, Sri Nur. “Good Governance Dalam Konteks Hukum Administrasi.” Adminitrative Law & Governance Journal 2, no. 2 (2019): 206–2017.
  5. HR, Syaukani. Otonomi Daerah Dalam Negara Kesatuan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2002.
  6. Huda, Ni’matul. Pengawasan Pusat Terhadap Daerah Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Daerah. yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2007.
  7. Huda, Ni’matul. “Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1974 Dan Reformasi Pemerintahan Di Daerah.” Jurnal Hukum 5, no. 48–59 (2008).
  8. Kaloh, J. Kepemimpnan Kepala Daerah, 1st Ed. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika Offset, 2009.
  9. Komari, H.A. Implikasi Penolakan Laporan Keterangan Pertanggungjawaban Kepala Daerah Dalam Prespektif Hukum Tata Negara. Purwokerto: FH Unsoed Press, 2009.
  10. Morissan. Hukum Tata Negara Republik Indonesia Era Reformasi. Jakarta: Ramdinn Prakarsa, 2005.
  11. Muhammad Nasarudin, Tubagus. “Asas Dan Norma Hukum Administrasi Negara Dalam Pembuatan Instrumen Pemerintahan.” Jurnal Hukum Novelty 7, no. 2 (2016): 139. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v7i2.a546.
  12. Philipus M. Hadjon. Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia. yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2008.
  13. Prayudi. “Decentralization in The Indonesian Goverment System: State Politics in Center-Region Relation.” Jurnal DPR RI 19, no. 4 (2014): 293–310.
  14. Raharjo Jati, Wasisto. “Inkonsistensi Paradigma Otonomi Daerah Di Indonesia: Dilema Sentralisasi Atau Desentralisasi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 9, no. 4 (2012): 744–68.
  15. Syamsuddin, Aziz. Proses Dan Teknik Penyusunan Undang-Undang. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014.
  16. triningsih, Anna. “Politik Hukum Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Dalam Penyelenggaraan Negara.” Journal Konstitusi 13, no. 1 (2016): 124–44.
  17. Widodo, Joko. Akuntabilitas Dan Kontrol Birokrasi Pada Era Desentralisasi Dan Otonomi Daerah. Surabaya: Insan Cendekia, 2001.
  18. Wignosoebroto. Pasang Surut Otonomi Daerah: Sketsa Perjalanan 100 Tahun. Jakarta: Yayasan Tifa, 2007.