Main Article Content

Abstract

This article provides an in-depth analysis and a critical examination of the human rights protection instrument that does not govern the mechanism to resolve the problem of Freedom of Religion rights violation. This article use normative legal research with statutory and historical approaches. The data will be analysed by using descriptive-analytical analysis. This article reveals that Human Rights Protection, especially on the Right to Freedom of Religion, is still becoming a matter of concern for Indonesia. The right to freedom of religion or belief is a fundamental human right recognised in all the major human rights treaties. However, they are still inter-religious tensions and a lack of protection by the Indonesian Government. For example, the violence exploded in Karubaga, the capital of Tolikara district in Papua province. Dozens of stalls and houses were set on fire, which spread to a nearby mosque, reported as conducted by the members of the Christians Group. The recent incidents happened in Singkil, Aceh. In Indonesia a state with various religious diversity which recognises five religions and one thought, it still does not establish the strict protection of the freedom of religion. The law only provides the mechanism on how to resolve grave human rights violations. On the other side, the protection of the light-categorised violation still cannot be enforced. Based on this analysis, the paper offers practical recommendations and guidance for state officials to enhance the protection of all religious groups in expressing their thoughts and to assure the harmonisation of inter-religion life.

Keywords

Human Rights Protection Freedom of Religion Inter-religious Tensions

Article Details

References

  1. A. Robinson, Bruce. “Religious Intolerance.” religioustolerance.org, 2021. http://www.religioustolerance.org/relintol1.htm#def.
  2. Budiardjo, Miriam. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik. 1st ed. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2008.
  3. Damayanti, Angel. “Muslim-Christian Relationships in Indonesian Reform Era Within the Framework of Democracy: Case Study of Bandung, Bekasi and Bogor.” University of Sains Malaysia, 2017.
  4. Dijk, Kees van. A Country in Despair: Indonesia between 1997 and 2000. Leiden: KITLV Press, 2001.
  5. Effendy, Bahtiar. Islam and the State in Indonesia. Singapore: ISEAS, 2003.
  6. Fauzi, Intan. “Chronology of Tolikara Clash.” en.metrotvnews.com, 2021. http://en.metrotvnews.com/read/2015/07/22/149537/police-chronology-of-tolikara-clash.
  7. Fuad, Choirul. Konflik Bernuansa Agama: Peta Konflik Berbagai Daerah Di Indonesia 1997-2005. Jakarta: Puslitbang Kehidupan Keagamaan, Badan Litbang dan Diklat, Kementerian Agama RI, 2013.
  8. Gunawan, Budi. Terorisme: Mitos & Konspirasi. Jakarta: Forum Media Utama, 2006.
  9. Hasrullah. Dendam Konflik Poso (Periode 1998-2001): Konflik Poso Dari Perspektif Komunikasi Politik. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2009.
  10. Heta news. “Peristiwa Aceh Singkil Intoleransi Ditengah Kebhinekaan.” hetanews.com, 2021. http://www.hetanews.com/article/33558/peristiwa-aceh-singkil-intoleransi-ditengah-kebhinekaan.
  11. Judohusodo, Siswono. Agama-Agama Dan Wawasan Kebangsaan” in Agamaagama Dan Wawasan Kebangsaan. Jakarta: Balitbang PGI and Mission 21, 2005.
  12. Kampschulte, Theodor. Situasi HAM Di Indonesia: Kebebasan Beragama Dan Aksi Kekerasan. Postfach: Internationales Katholicsches Missioswerk e.v Fachstelle Menschenrechte, 2001.
  13. Kompas. “Kronologi Bentrok Massa Di Aceh Singkil Versi Kapolri.” Kompas.com, 2021. http://nasional.kompas.com/read/2015/10/13/23020341/Kronologi.Bentrok.Massa.di.Aceh.Singkil.Versi.Kapolri.
  14. Krisdanar, V. “Menggagas Constitutional Complaint Dalam Memproteksi Hak Konstitusional Masyarakat Mengenai Kehidupan Dan Kebebasan Beragama Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Konstitusi 7, no. 3 (2010): 185–208.
  15. Lay, Cornelis. “Kekerasan Atas Nama Agama: Perspektif Politik.” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik 13, no. 1 (2009): 1–8.
  16. Muharam, Ricky Santoso. “Membangun Toleransi Umat Beragama Di Indonesia Berdasarkan Konsep Deklarasi Kairo.” Jurnal HAM 11, no. 2 (2020): 269–83. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2020.11.269-283.
  17. Parlina, Ina. “The Police List Two GIDI Members.” thejakartapost.com, 2021. http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2015/07/24/police-list-two-gidi-members-suspects.html.
  18. Salim, Delmus Puneri. “Kerukunan Umat Beragama Vs Kebebasan Beragama Di Indonesia.” Potret Pemikiran 21, no. 2 (2017): 16–34. https://doi.org/10.30984/pp.v21i2.741.
  19. Simamora, Oliver. “Peristiwa Aceh Singkil, Intoleransi Ditengah Kebinekaan.” hetanews.com, 2021. http://www.hetanews.com/article/33558/peristiwa-aceh-singkil-intoleransi-ditengah-kebhinekaan.
  20. Situmorang, Victorio H. “Kebebasan Beragama Sebagai Bagian Dari Hak Asasi Manusia.” Jurnal HAM 10, no. 1 (2019): 57–68.
  21. Soemantri, Sri. Prosedur Dan Sistem Perubahan Konstitusi. Bandung: PT Alumni, 2006.
  22. Suci Rahayu, Dewi. “Police Name Eight Suspects in Aceh Singkil Case.” en.tempo.co, 2015. https://en.tempo.co/read/709690/police-name-eight-suspects-in-aceh-singkil-case.
  23. Syukron, Buyung. “Agama Dalam Pusaran Konflik (Studi Analisis Resolusi Terhadap Munculnya Kekerasan Sosial Berbasis Agama Di Indonesia).” RI‘AYAH 2, no. 1 (2017): 1–28.
  24. Zamzani, Fitriyan. “Muslim-GIDI Sepakat Berdamai.” www.republika.co.id, 2021. http://www.republika.co.id/berita/koran/halaman-1/15/07/31/nsca6244-muslimgidi-di-tolikarasepakat-berdamai.