Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 402 Download : 430

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The advocate profession as an officium nobile is required to carry out their duties professionally in the real terms of the implementation for the community. However, various professional advocacy organizations currently influence the effect of professionality ethical values. In this regard, it is necessary to conduct a study on how advocates' professionalism in Indonesia in accordance with the value of Pancasila as contained Law No. 18 of 2003 on Advocate (Advocate Law 2003) and Indonesian Advocates' Code of Ethics (KEAI). The research aims to harmonize KEAI and Advocate Law 2003 and create a Professional Committee for the advocate in Indonesia. This research used normative legal research with comparative and historical approaches. The result showed that the improvement of current KEAI as mandated by Advocate Law 2003 by confirming the position of the Supervisory Commission and the Honorary Council and further involving external elements, as well as elements of the state as controllers will avoid the advocate profession from the involvement of unethical behavior, slaves by the client and its involvement to the criminal offences.

Keywords

Professionalism Advocate Code of Ethics Advocate Law

Article Details

References

  1. A. Hamid Attamini. Ilmu Perundang-Undangan : Jenis, Fungsi Dan Materi Muatan. Jakarta: Kanisius, 2007.
  2. Ade Irawan Taufik. “Sinergitas Peran Dan Tanggung Jawab Advokat Dan Negara Dalam Pemberian Bantuan Hukum Cuma-Cuma.” Jurnal Rechvinding 2, no. 1 (2013): 47–58.
  3. Agus Wahyudi. “Ideologi Pancasila: Doktrin Yang Komprehensif Atau Konsepsi Politis?” Jurnal Filsafat 39, no. 1 (2006): 95–115.
  4. Americanbar.org. “Model Rules of Professional Conduct - Table of Contents.” americanbar.org, 2020. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/model_rules_of_professional_conduct_table_of_contents/.
  5. Ansori, Lutfil. “Reformasi Penegakan Hukum Perspektif Hukum Progresif.” Jurnal Yuridis 4, no. 2 (2017): 148–63.
  6. Ari Yusuf Amir. Strategi Jasa Advokat. Yogyakarta: Navila Idea, 2008.
  7. Darmodiharjo, Darji. “Cinta Negara Integralistik Indonesia Dalam Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.” Era Hukum 3, no. 1 (1995): 1–11.
  8. Frans Hendra Winarta. Bantuan Hukum Suatu Hak Asasi Manusia Bukan Belas Kasihan. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo, 2000.
  9. Frans Hendra Winarta. “Pembahasan RUU Advokat Dan Agenda Perbaikan Profesi Advokat Dalam Makalah Seminar.” 2003.
  10. Hadjar, Ibnu. “Pengawasan Advokat: Upaya Menuju Profesionalisme.” Al-Mawarid 12 (2004): 61–78. https://doi.org/10.20885/almawarid.vol12.art5.
  11. Handayani, Tri Astuti. “Kedudukan Dan Peranan Advokat Dalam Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia (Study Di Dewan Pimpinan Cabang Peradi Kabupaten Bojonegoro).” JUSTITIABLE - Jurnal Hukum 1, no. 1 (2018): 13–24.
  12. Kuswandi. “ICW: Selain Fredrich, Sudah Ada 22 Advokat Yang Terjerat Kasus Hukum.” www.jawapos.com, 2018. https://www.jawapos.com/nasional/hukum-kriminal/14/01/2018/icw-selain-fredrich-sudah-ada-22-advokat-yang-terjerat-kasus-hukum/.
  13. Monika Suhayati. “Pengaturan Sistem Organisasi Advokat Dalam Rancangan Undang-Undang.” Journal Kajian 20, no. 4 (2015): 317–28.
  14. Pramono, Agus. “Etika Profesi Advokat Sebagai Upaya Pengawasan Dalam Menjalankan Fungsi Advokat Sebagai Penegak Hukum.” DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 12, no. 24 (2016): 136–48. https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v12i24.2242.
  15. Rachman, Dylan Aprialdo. “Fredrich Yunadi Divonis 7 Tahun Penjara.” kompas.com, 2018. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2018/06/28/17040681/fredrich-yunadi-divonis7tahun-penjara?page=all.
  16. Raharjo, Agus, and Sunarnyo. “Penilaian Profesionalisme Advokat Dalam Penegakan Hukum Melalui Pengukuran Indikator Kinerja Etisnya.” Jornal Mediahukum 21, no. 2 (2014): 182–96.
  17. Rivki. “Peradi Pecat 12 Advokat Nakal.” https://news.detik.com, 2017. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-3527304/peradi-pecat-12-advokat-nakal.
  18. Sidharta, B. Arief. “Etika Dan Kode Etik Profesi Hukum.” Veritas et Justitia 1, no. 1 (2015): 220–49. https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.1423.
  19. Soerjono Soekamto. Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2002.
  20. The General Secretariat of the National Leadership Council (DPN). “The Data Was Officially Obtained from the General Secretariat of the National Leadership Council (DPN) of the Indonesian Advocates Association (PERADI), Grand Slipi Tower, 11th Floor. JL. S. Parman Kav. 22-24 Jakarta 11480-Indonesia on 02 September 2020.” Jakarta, 2020.
  21. Wisnubroto, Al. “Upaya Mengembalikan Kemandirian Hakim Melalui Pemahaman Realitas Sosialnya.” Jurnal Hukum Pro Justitia 20, no. 1 (2003): 9–23.