Perbandingan XGBoost, Random Forest, dan MLP untuk Klasifikasi Kesiapan Atlet
Abstract
Athlete readiness classification is critical for optimizing training load and preventing overtraining-related injuries. This study develops and compares three machine learning algorithms XGBoost, Random Forest, and MLP Neural Network to classify athlete readiness into three ordinal categories: Lower, Middle, and Upper. The dataset comprises 1153 instances with nine multidimensional features encompassing physiological parameters (training duration, intensity, interval days, points, recovery) and psychological indicators (mental score, athlete category, consistency). Data preprocessing involved label encoding for categorical variables and standard scaling for numerical features, followed by a stratified 80:20 train-test split. Model performance was evaluated using weighted precision, recall, F1-score, confusion matrix, and one-vs-rest ROC-AUC curves with 5-fold cross-validation. Results indicate that XGBoost achieved the highest predictive performance (F1-score: 0.93, AUC: 0.99), followed by Random Forest (F1-score: 0.91, AUC: 0.98) and MLP Neural Network (F1-score: 0.85, AUC: 0.94). Feature importance analysis revealed that mental score, training intensity, and consistency were the strongest predictors of readiness status. The proposed framework offers a robust, data-driven decision support tool for sports practitioners, enabling objective readiness monitoring and dynamic training adjustments. Future work will focus on real-time wearable integration and automated hyperparameter optimization
Keywords
Kesiapan Atlet; Machine learning; XGBoost; Random forest; MLP Neural Network; Klasifikasi; Performa OlahragaReferences
- [1] V. O. Silvino et al., “The Use of Machine Learning in Sports Performance: A Systematic Review,” Transl. J. Am. Coll. Sport. Med., vol. 10, no. 2, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1249/TJX.0000000000000304.
- [2] A. G. Macedo et al., “Load Monitoring Methods for Controlling Training Effectiveness on Physical Conditioning and Planning Involvement: A Narrative Review,” Appl. Sci., vol. 14, no. 22, p. 10465, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.3390/app142210465.
- [3] Q. Zhang, Q. Wang, and Y. Niu, “Adaptive training load optimization for track and field athletes: A reinforcement learning approach,” Sci. Rep., vol. 16, no. 1, p. 14862, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-41946-w.
- [4] L. Montull, A. Slapšinskaitė-Dackevičienė, J. Kiely, R. Hristovski, and N. Balagué, “Integrative Proposals of Sports Monitoring: Subjective Outperforms Objective Monitoring,” Sport. Med. - Open, vol. 8, no. 1, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1186/s40798-022-00432-z.
- [5] Q. Jianjun, H. F. Isleem, W. J. K. Almoghayer, and M. Khishe, “Predictive athlete performance modeling with machine learning and biometric data integration,” Sci. Rep., vol. 15, no. 1, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01438-9.
- [6] C. Leckey, N. Van Dyk, C. Doherty, A. Lawlor, and E. Delahunt, “Machine learning approaches to injury risk prediction in sport: A scoping review with evidence synthesis,” Apr. 01, 2025, BMJ Publishing Group. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2024-108576.
- [7] A. Rossi, L. Pappalardo, and P. Cintia, “A narrative review for a machine learning application in sports: An example based on injury forecasting in soccer,” Jan. 01, 2022, MDPI. doi: 10.3390/sports10010005.
- [8] Y. Jia et al., “A narrative review of deep learning applications in sports performance analysis: current practices, challenges, and future directions,” BMC Sports Sci. Med. Rehabil., vol. 17, no. 1, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1186/s13102-025-01294-0.
- [9] Y. H. Lee, J. Chang, J. E. Lee, Y. S. Jung, D. Lee, and H. S. Lee, “Essential elements of physical fitness analysis in male adolescent athletes using machine learning,” PLoS One, vol. 19, no. 4 April, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298870.
- [10] X. Zhang, Z. Lin, and S. Gu, “A machine learning model the prediction of athlete engagement based on cohesion, passion and mental toughness,” Sci. Rep., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 3220, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87794-y.
- [11] R. Purcell et al., “Starting young to protect elite athletes’ mental health,” Apr. 01, 2023, BMJ Publishing Group. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2022-106352.
- [12] M. Proost et al., “How to Tackle Mental Fatigue: A Systematic Review of Potential Countermeasures and Their Underlying Mechanisms,” Sport. Med., vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 2129–2158, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s40279-022-01678-z.
- [13] J. Rodríguez-Medina, B. Carballo-Leyenda, J. Gutiérrez-Arroyo, F. García-Heras, and J. A. Rodríguez-Marroyo, “Analyzing Competitive Demands in Mountain Running Races: A Running Power-Based Approach,” Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 275–281, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2024-0234.
- [14] X. Guo, J. Cheng, and Y. Mu, “Optimizing Military Sports Training Effectiveness: Predictive Analysis Using the XGBoost Model,” in Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Management Science and Computer Engineering, New York, NY, USA: ACM, Jun. 2025, pp. 406–409. doi: 10.1145/3760023.3760089.
- [15] Y. Lei, S. Shen, and T. Mi, “Predicting Olympic Medal Tally with XGBoost: A Novel Model for First-Time Medalist Probabilities and the Great Coach Effect,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Image Processing, Machine Learning, and Pattern Recognition, New York, NY, USA: ACM, Jul. 2025, pp. 122–130. doi: 10.1145/3759928.3759949.
- [16] S. Zheng and X. Man, “An Improved Logistic Regression Method for Assessing the Performance of Track and Field Sports,” Comput. Intell. Neurosci., vol. 2022, 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/6341495.
- [17] D. R. Seshadri et al., “Wearable sensors for monitoring the internal and external workload of the athlete,” Dec. 01, 2019, Nature Publishing Group. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0149-2.
- [18] Q. Tang, X. Wei, and B. Tan, “Role of Machine Learning in Talent Identification for Team Sports: A Systematic Review,” ©Journal Sport. Sci. Med., vol. 25, pp. 58–83, 2026, doi: 10.52082/jssm.2026.58`The.
- [19] S. P. Tanzil and A. Widi, “Software Development for Swimmer Performance Prediction System Based on Physical Characteristics using XGBoost,” vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 429–439, 2026.
- [20] M. N. Muhammad, M. Masjkur, and M. N. Aidi, “Penerapan Model Regresi Logistik Biner dan Random Forest terhadap Prospek Atlet Muda pada Liga Basket DBL Tahun 2019,” Xplore J. Stat., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 252–262, 2023, doi: 10.29244/xplore.v12i3.1162.
- [21] A. Sezen and G. Türkmen, “A Comparative Analysis of XGBoost and LightGBM Approaches for Human Activity Recognition: Speed and Accuracy Evaluation,” Int. J. Comput. Exp. Sci. Eng., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 262–270, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.22399/ijcesen.329.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Alisha Sumahesa, Cahyono Budy Santoso, Perbandingan Kinerja Algoritma Machine Learning pada Sentimen #KaburAjaDulu dengan Penanganan Ketidakseimbangan Data Menggunakan SMOTE , Jurnal Komtika (Komputasi dan Informatika): Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026)
