Jurnal Tarbiyatuna

Articles

Global Trends in Design Thinking Research in Education: A Bibliometric Analysis with Implications for Islamic Education (2015–2025)

Kustiarini , Sarwi , Ani Rusilowati , Novi Ratna Dewi

Abstrak

This study aims to map global research trends in Design Thinking in education and examine their implications for Islamic education using a bibliometric approach. A total of 511 Scopus-indexed journal articles published between 2015 and 2025 were analyzed using VOSviewer. The analysis examined publication trends, co-authorship networks, citation networks, international collaboration, and keyword co-occurrence. The findings indicate a substantial increase in Design Thinking publications after 2018, reaching a peak in 2023. Despite this growth, scholarly collaboration remains fragmented, with only a small proportion of authors participating in interconnected research networks. The journal Sustainability emerged as the leading publication source, while international research collaboration remained concentrated in Global North countries.Keyword analysis identified seven thematic clusters, revealing a shift from empathy- and cognition-oriented studies toward collaborative pedagogy, digital learning, and educational innovation. These findings suggest that Design Thinking has evolved into a pedagogical approach that supports learner-centered and value-based education. For Islamic education, these findings provide conceptual insights into strengthening collaboration, problem-solving, character education, and social responsibility through innovative learning practices. This study provides a comprehensive bibliometric mapping that may serve as a reference for future research and for the contextual development of Design Thinking in Islamic education

Keywords

Design Thinking; Bibliometric Analysis; Educational Research; Knowledge Mapping; Islamic Education

Referensi

  1. Arfi, Ben Nasr, K., & Hikkerova. (2021). The Role of Trust in Intention to Use the IoT in eHealth: Application of the Modified UTAUT in a Consumer Context. Elsevier., 33. 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120688
  2. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2020). Package ‘ bibliometrix ’ R topics documented : 68.
  3. Aris, N. M., Dayana, N., Halim, A., Ali, S., Rusli, N. H., Nabila, M., Suratin, M., & Hassan, C. (2022). Evaluating The Academic Trends On Design Thinking Research: A Bibliometric Analysis From 2000 to 2021. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 2022(4), 1022–1038.
  4. Bornmann, L., & Haunschild, R. (2022). Empirical analysis of recent temporal dynamics of research fields : Annual publications in chemistry and related areas as an example. 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2022.101253
  5. Brown, T. (2009). Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. HarperBusiness.
  6. Calavia, M. B., Blanco, T., Casas, R., & Dieste, B. (2023). Making design thinking for education sustainable: Training preservice teachers to address practice challenges. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47(November 2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101199
  7. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296.
  8. Fitriyah, I. J., Saputro, S., & Sajidan. (2025). Research Trends in Design Thinking Education: A Systematic Literature Review from 2014 to 2024. European Journal of Educational Research, 14(2), 381–393. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.14.2.381
  9. Fortunato, S., Bergstrom, C. T., Börner, K., Evans, J. A., Helbing, D., Milojević, S., Petersen, A. M., Radicchi, F., Sinatra, R., Uzzi, B., Vespignani, A., & Waltman, L. (2018). Science of Science. DOI: 10.1126/science.aao0185
  10. dos Santos Galvão, N. M., & Nou Schneider, H. (2023). Design Thinking In Education: A Bibliometric Study In International Research. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estudos em Educação, 18. https://doi.org/10.21723/riaee.v18i00.17667
  11. Glänzel, W. (2003). Bibliometrics as a research field. Techniques, 20, 2005.
  12. Gümüş, S., Bellibaş, M. Ş., Gümüş, E., & Hallinger, P. (2020). Science mapping research on educational leadership and management in Turkey: a bibliometric review of international publications. School Leadership and Management, 40(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1578737
  13. Župič, Ivan, & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational research methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
  14. Moruzzi, M. C., Santhosh, S., Corsi, M., Bagassi, S., & Crescenzio, F. De. (2023). Design and implementation of eye tracking application for generation of augmented reality content on spatial see through display of remote and virtual control tower ( RVT ). International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 17(4), 1859–1867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-023-01288-7
  15. Ng, D. T. K., Luo, W., Chan, H. M. Y., & Chu, S. K. W. (2022). Using digital story writing as a pedagogy to develop AI literacy among primary students. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100054. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100054
  16. Rauth, I., Köppen, E., Jobst, B., & Meinel, C. (2010). Design thinking: An educational model towards creative confidence. In DS 66-2: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on design creativity (ICDC 2010). December, 1–8.
  17. Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What Is Design Thinking and Why Is It Important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457429
  18. Micheli, P., Wilner, S. J., Bhatti, S. H., Mura, M., & Beverland, M. B. (2019). Doing design thinking: Conceptual review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Product innovation management, 36(2), 124-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12466
  19. Risdiani, R., Srifariyati, S., Raharjo, R., & Rohman, A. (2023). The Application Of Mentimeter To Improve Critical Thinking Skills In Al Islam Dan Muhammadiyah (Aik) Course. Jurnal Tarbiyatuna, 14(1), 63-74. DOI 10.31603/tarbiyatuna.v14i1.9000
  20. Rochmat, C. S., Yoranita, A. S. P. Y., Prihatini, M., & Wibawa, B. A. (2023). The quality of education from islamic perspective analysis of the merdeka belajar curriculum in facing the society 5.0 era. Jurnal Tarbiyatuna, 14(1), 75–93. DOI 10.31603/tarbiyatuna.v14i1.8633
  21. Scheer, A., Noweski, C., & Meinel, C. (2012). Transforming Constructivist Learning into Action: Design thinking in education. Research: Uncertainty Contradiction Value - DRS International Conference 2012, 8–19. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2012.122
  22. Seidel, V. P., & Fixson, S. K. (2013). Adopting design thinking in novice multidisciplinary teams: The application and limits of design methods and reflexive practices. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30, 19-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12061
  23. Shiffrin, R. M., Börner, K., & Stigler, S. M. (2018). Scientific progress despite irreproducibility: A seeming paradox. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2632-2639. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1711786114
  24. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111(2), 1053–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7
  25. Wang, B., Rau, P. L. P., & Yuan, T. (2023). Measuring user competence in using artificial intelligence: validity and reliability of artificial intelligence literacy scale. Behaviour &information Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2022.2072768