Main Article Content

Abstract

The hybrid catenary–battery system offers a promising solution for railways operating in non-electrified sections and during emergencies, ensuring uninterrupted operation, enhanced safety, environmental sustainability, and cost efficiency. This study addresses the challenge of determining an appropriate battery size and introduces a novel rule-based Energy Management Strategy (EMS) with coasting mode to minimize energy consumption while meeting operational requirements. The novelty of this work lies in (i) a straightforward sizing method based on worst-case emergency scenarios and (ii) the integration of coasting-mode operation into a rule-based EMS for hybrid catenary–battery trains. Simulation results show that the proposed approach achieves up to 12.56% energy savings on 3% gradient tracks while fully supplying auxiliary loads, compared with baseline operation that provides only partial coverage. These results demonstrate a practical and scalable framework for designing efficient, reliable, and resilient railway transport systems.

Keywords

Hybrid railway Catenary Battery Energy management Coasting mode

Article Details

References

  1. A. Aroua, C. Dépature, W. Lhomme, M. Renault, J. Déon, and C. Mayet, “Challenges of Holistic Approach for Energy Management Strategies of Hybrid Dual-mode Trains,” 2024 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference, VPPC 2024 - Proceedings, pp. 1–6, 2024, doi: 10.1109/VPPC63154.2024.10755357.
  2. J. J. Mwambeleko and T. Kulworawanichpong, “Battery and accelerating-catenary hybrid system for light rail vehicles and trams,” 2017 International Electrical Engineering Congress, iEECON 2017, vol. 150, no. March, pp. 8–10, 2017, doi: 10.1109/IEECON.2017.8075778.
  3. J. J. Mwambeleko, T. Hayasaka, and T. Kulworawanichpong, “Enhancing conventional battery and contact line hybrid tram system with accelerating contact lines,” IET Electrical Systems in Transportation, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 105–115, 2020, doi: 10.1049/iet-est.2018.5033.
  4. E. Fedele, D. Iannuzzi, and A. Del Pizzo, “Onboard energy storage in rail transport: Review of real applications and techno‐economic assessments,” IET Electrical Systems in Transportation, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 279–309, 2021, doi: 10.1049/els2.12026.
  5. Y. Kono, N. Shiraki, H. Yokoyama, and R. Furuta, “Catenary and storage battery hybrid system for electric railcar series EV-E301,” 2014 International Power Electronics Conference, IPEC-Hiroshima - ECCE Asia 2014, pp. 2120–2125, 2014, doi: 10.1109/IPEC.2014.6869881.
  6. H. Hirose, K. Yoshida, and K. Shibanuma, “Development of catenary and storage battery hybrid train system,” Electrical Systems for Aircraft, Railway and Ship Propulsion, ESARS, pp. 1–4, 2012, doi: 10.1109/ESARS.2012.6387395.
  7. N. Shiraki, K. Tokito, and R. Yokozutsumi, “Propulsion system for catenary and storage battery hybrid electric railcar series EV-E301,” Electrical Systems for Aircraft, Railway and Ship Propulsion, ESARS, vol. 2015-May, pp. 1–7, 2015, doi: 10.1109/ESARS.2015.7101511.
  8. R. Furuta, J. Kawasaki, and K. Kondo, “Hybrid traction technologies with energy storage devices for nonelectrified railway lines,” IEEJ Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 291–297, 2010, doi: 10.1002/tee.20532.
  9. Z. Xiao, P. Sun, Q. Wang, Y. Zhu, and X. Feng, “Integrated optimization of speed profiles and power split for a tram with hybrid energy storage systems on a signalized route,” Energies, vol. 11, no. 3, 2018, doi: 10.3390/en11030478.
  10. Y. Yang, W. Zhang, S. Wei, and Z. Wang, “Optimal sizing of on-board energy storage systems and stationary charging infrastructures for a catenary-free tram,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 23, 2020, doi: 10.3390/en13236227.
  11. F. Borghetti, C. G. Colombo, M. Longo, R. Mazzoncini, and C. Somaschini, “Development of a new urban line with innovative trams,” WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, vol. 204, pp. 167–178, 2021, doi: 10.2495/UT210141.
  12. M. Schenker, T. Schirmer, and H. Dittus, “Application and improvement of a direct method optimization approach for battery electric railway vehicle operation,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, vol. 235, no. 7, pp. 854–865, 2021, doi: 10.1177/0954409720970002.
  13. N. Ghaviha, M. Bohlin, C. Holmberg, and E. Dahlquist, “Speed profile optimization of catenary-free electric trains with lithium-ion batteries,” Journal of Modern Transportation, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 153–168, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s40534-018-0181-y.
  14. L. Pugi and L. di Carlo, “Multi-modal battery-operated trains on partially electrified lines: A case study on some regional lines in Italy,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, vol. 238, no. 7, pp. 873–885, 2024, doi: 10.1177/09544097241234959.
  15. M. Magelli et al., “Feasibility study of a diesel-powered hybrid DMU,” Railway Engineering Science, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 271–284, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s40534-021-00241-2.
  16. H. Maghfiroh, O. Wahyunggoro, and A. I. Cahyadi, “Real-time Energy Management Strategy of Hybrid Electric Vehicle : A Review,” IJE TRANSACTIONS C: Aspects, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 2887–2901, 2025, doi: 10.5829/ije.2025.38.12c.07.
  17. H. Maghfiroh, O. Wahyunggoro, and A. I. Cahyadi, “Comparative Analysis of Rule-Based Energy Management Strategies for Hybrid Energy Storage Electric Vehicles,” in 2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Technologies for Industrial Automation (ROBOTHIA), IEEE, 2025, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/ROBOTHIA63806.2025.10986476.
  18. M. Poline, L. Gerbaud, J. Pouget, and F. Chauvet, “Simultaneous optimization of sizing and energy management—Application to hybrid train,” Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, vol. 158, pp. 355–374, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2018.09.021.
  19. F. A. Pamuji et al., “Energy Management System Design for Hybrid and Intelligent Light Train,” Przeglad Elektrotechniczny, vol. 2023, no. 8, pp. 80–86, 2023, doi: 10.15199/48.2023.08.13.
  20. U. Sarma and S. Ganguly, “Determination of the component sizing for the PEM fuel cell-battery hybrid energy system for locomotive application using particle swarm optimization,” Journal of Energy Storage, vol. 19, no. February, pp. 247–259, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.est.2018.08.008.
  21. S. Roth and P. Tricoli, “Stationary fuel cell power supply for railway electrification systems,” CPE-POWERENG 2023 - 17th IEEE International Conference on Compatibility, Power Electronics and Power Engineering, pp. 1–6, 2023, doi: 10.1109/CPE-POWERENG58103.2023.10227490.
  22. P. R. Sivaraman, “Implementation of SOC based cost effective power management in hybrid electric train using physics informed neural network control,” Journal of Energy Storage, vol. 132, no. PB, p. 117793, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.est.2025.117793.
  23. C. Wu, S. Lu, F. Xue, L. Jiang, and M. Chen, “Optimal Sizing of Onboard Energy Storage Devices for Electrified Railway Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1301–1311, 2020, doi: 10.1109/TTE.2020.2996362.
  24. A. R. Miller, K. S. Hess, D. L. Barnes, and T. L. Erickson, “System design of a large fuel cell hybrid locomotive,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 173, no. 2 SPEC. ISS., pp. 935–942, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.08.045.
  25. M. Kapetanović, A. Núñez, N. van Oort, and R. M. P. Goverde, “Analysis of hydrogen-powered propulsion system alternatives for diesel-electric regional trains,” Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management, vol. 23, p. 100338, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jrtpm.2022.100338.
  26. H. Maghfiroh, “Application of Battery as an on-board ESS to Reduce Peak Load and to Increase Regenerative Braking’s Energy Absorption,” Jurnal Penelitian Transportasi Darat, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 1689–1699, 2012, doi: 10.25104/jptd.v22i1.1371.

Most read articles by the same author(s)