Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 805 Download : 591

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

As part of the Supply Chain (SC), oftentimes Land Logistic Driver (LLD) are held by various uncontrollable occurrences from the surroundings. This caused the cognitive load of the drivers to become higher, which could potentially affect the performance of the LLD to meet the Key Performance Indicator (KPI) of the SC overall. Not only the performance that is affected, but a higher load also could affect the driving behavior towards negativity, as anger and stress perceived become higher, hence a higher crash possibility. Therefore, the need to study the possibility to measure the cognitive load in a certain route that they are on, so any adjustments could be made during a transport activity, with Electroencephalogram (EEG) used as the means to measure it. This study is done by reviewing 15 available research as references regarding EEG and cognitive load. It is possible to use EEG in measuring cognitive load during driving activity, with the focus area of data gathering on the central lobe, parietal lobe, and temporal lobes, with the data extracted from EEG should use the most accurate classifier that focuses on analyzing beta (β) and alpha (α) band as the significant brain wave of the active state. The possible result of the brain wave analysis could be used to determine whether the current route option is burdening LLDs' cognitive load and should be corrected to improve safety driving. Further inclusion of the analysis result could be incorporated into a set of KPI in measuring SC performance.

Keywords

Electroencephalogram Driving fatigue Cognitive load Safety driving Transportation route

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

  1. K. Katsaliaki, P. Galetsi, and S. Kumar, “Supply chain disruptions and resilience: A major review and future research agenda,” Ann. Oper. Res., vol. 319, pp. 965–1002, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10479-020-03912-1.
  2. M. C. Wilson, “The impact of transportation disruptions on supply chain performance,” Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev., vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 295–320, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2005.09.008.
  3. D. Ivanov, A. Dolgui, B. Sokolov, and M. Ivanova, “Literature review on disruption recovery in the supply chain,” Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 55, no. 20, pp. 6158–6174, 2017, doi: 10.1080/00207543.2017.1330572.
  4. I. P. Tama, A. Sudiarno, A. Larasati, D. Hardiningtyas, and W. S. Nugroho, “The Analysis of Land Logistic Transport Driver Cognitive Load Impact to Supply Chain Performance using System Dynamics Approach,” in 2nd International Conference on Engineering and Management in Industrial System, 2022.
  5. P. Delhomme and A. Gheorghiu, “Perceived stress, mental health, organizational factors, and self-reported risky driving behaviors among truck drivers circulating in France,” J. Safety Res., vol. 79, pp. 341–351, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2021.10.001.
  6. S. Gangadharan and A. P. Vinod, “Drowsiness detection using portable wireless EEG,” Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., vol. 214, p. 106535, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106535.
  7. Z. Halim and M. Rehan, “On identification of driving-induced stress using electroencephalogram signals: A framework based on wearable safety-critical scheme and machine learning,” Inf. Fusion, vol. 53, pp. 66–79, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2019.06.006.
  8. J. Min, C. Xiong, Y. Zhang, and M. Cai, “Driver fatigue detection based on prefrontal EEG using multi-entropy measures and hybrid model,” Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 69, p. 102857, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.102857.
  9. J. Jeon and H. Cai, “Classification of construction hazard-related perceptions using: Wearable electroencephalogram and virtual reality,” Autom. Constr., vol. 132, p. 103975, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103975.
  10. Worldometer, “Countries in the world by population (2022),” United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2022. https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/population-by-country/ (accessed Oct. 31, 2022).
  11. B. T. Jap, S. Lal, P. Fischer, and E. Bekiaris, “Using EEG spectral components to assess algorithms for detecting fatigue,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 2352–2359, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.12.043.
  12. S. Kar, M. Bhagat, and A. Routray, “EEG signal analysis for the assessment and quantification of driver’s fatigue,” Transp. Res. part F traffic Psychol. Behav., vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 297–306, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2010.06.006.
  13. M. Simon et al., “EEG alpha spindle measures as indicators of driver fatigue under real traffic conditions,” Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 122, no. 6, pp. 1168–1178, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.10.044.
  14. S. Charbonnier, R. N. Roy, S. Bonnet, and A. Campagne, “EEG index for control operators’ mental fatigue monitoring using interactions between brain regions,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 52, pp. 91–98, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2016.01.013.
  15. I. Belakhdar, W. Kaaniche, R. Djemal, and B. Ouni, “Single-channel-based automatic drowsiness detection architecture with a reduced number of EEG features,” Microprocess. Microsyst., vol. 58, pp. 13–23, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.micpro.2018.02.004.
  16. E. Zero, C. Bersani, L. Zero, and R. Sacile, “Towards real-time monitoring of fear in driving sessions,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 52, no. 19, pp. 299–304, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.12.068.
  17. J. Chen, H. Wang, Q. Wang, and C. Hua, “Exploring the fatigue affecting electroencephalography based functional brain networks during real driving in young males,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 129, pp. 200–211, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.04.004.
  18. A. Mohammed and L. Wang, “Advanced human-robot collaborative assembly using electroencephalogram signals of human brains,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 93, pp. 1200–1205, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2020.03.074.
  19. V. Bajaj, S. Taran, S. K. Khare, and A. Sengur, “Feature extraction method for classification of alertness and drowsiness states EEG signals,” Appl. Acoust., vol. 163, p. 107224, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107224.
  20. Y. Zhang, H. Guo, Y. Zhou, C. Xu, and Y. Liao, “Recognising drivers’ mental fatigue based on EEG multi-dimensional feature selection and fusion,” Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 79, p. 104237, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2022.104237.
  21. X. Li, L. Yang, and X. Yan, “An exploratory study of drivers’ EEG response during emergent collision avoidance,” J. Safety Res., vol. 82, pp. 241–250, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2022.05.015.
  22. I. S. Polikanova and A. V. Sergeev., “The effect of long-term cognitive load on the EEG parameters,” Natl. Psychol. J., no. 13, pp. 86–94, 2014, doi: 10.11621/npj.2014.0109.
  23. A. Morley, L. H. Hill, and A. G. Kaditis, “10-20 system EEG Placement,” ERS Education, 2016. https://www.ers-education.org/lrmedia/2016/pdf/298830.pdf (accessed Oct. 27, 2022).
  24. R. Oostenveld and P. Praamstra, “The five percent electrode system for high-resolution EEG and ERP measurements,” Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 713–719, 2001, doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00527-7.
  25. Y. Zheng, Y. Ma, J. Cammon, S. Zhang, J. Zhang, and Y. Zhang, “A new feature selection approach for driving fatigue EEG detection with a modified machine learning algorithm,” Comput. Biol. Med., vol. 147, p. 105718, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105718.
  26. B. C. Banz, D. Hersey, and F. E. Vaca, “Coupling neuroscience and driving simulation: A systematic review of studies on crash-risk behaviors in young drivers,” Traffic Inj. Prev., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 90–95, 2021, doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1847283.
  27. W. Vanlaar, H. Simpson, D. Mayhew, and R. Robertson, “Fatigued and drowsy driving: A survey of attitudes, opinions and behaviors,” J. Safety Res., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 303–309, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2007.12.007.
  28. G. Borghini, L. Astolfi, G. Vecchiato, D. Mattia, and F. Babiloni, “Measuring neurophysiological signals in aircraft pilots and car drivers for the assessment of mental workload, fatigue and drowsiness,” Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., vol. 44, pp. 58–75, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.10.003.
  29. H. Liu, Y. Zhang, Y. Li, and X. Kong, “Review on emotion recognition based on electroencephalography,” Front. Comput. Neurosci., vol. 15, p. 84, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fncom.2021.758212.
  30. Z. Li, S. S. Man, A. H. S. Chan, and R. Wang, “Driving anger scale validation: relationship of driving anger with the aberrant driving behaviour of truck drivers,” Transp. Res. part F traffic Psychol. Behav., vol. 81, pp. 364–372, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2021.06.018.