Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 387 Download : 245

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) in the Banyumas area, Central Java, aims to provide inter-regional connectivity in Purwokerto City and Purbalingga Regency. This is one of the six BRT corridors in Central Java launched in 2018. Therefore, this study aims to examine the development of BRT corridors based on transit-integrated land use along the corridor, after five years of operation. The primary survey was conducted on land use along the corridor at a radius of 200 m and 400 m from the BRT bus stop, which was analyzed using a qualitative descriptive method. As a result, BRT Corridor 1 in Central Java can be identified for bus-based transit development. First, BRT services have connected high to very high populations. Second, BRT shelters have good access to shopping centers, culinary centers, and artificial tourism within a 200 m and 400 m radius. Third, BRT shelters are also connected to other modes of public transportation. However, the results of our study found that the BRT shelters had not been connected to pedestrian facilities. Based on these three criteria, BRT Corridor 1 in Central Java is feasible to be developed as a sustainable public transport service. However, further studies are needed to link BRT shelters with pedestrian facilities, in order to create clean and sustainable mobility.

Keywords

BRT Public transport Transit-oriented Sustainable mobility

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

  1. J. L. Renne, “Evaluating Transit-Oriented Development Using a Sustainability Framework: Lessons from Perth’s Network City,” Planning sustainable communities: Diversity of approaches and implementation challenges, pp. 115–148, 2009.
  2. P. Tafidis, A. Sdoukopoulos, and M. Pitsiava-Latinopoulou, “Sustainable urban mobility indicators: Policy versus practice in the case of Greek cities,” Transportation Research Procedia, vol. 24, no. 2016, pp. 304–312, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.122.
  3. F. D. Fistung, T. Popescu, and C. Sima, “Interferences between Sustainable Mobility and Economic Development in Romania,” Procedia Economics and Finance, vol. 22, no. November 2014, pp. 36–44, 2015, doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00224-5.
  4. A. Brandi, S. Gori, M. Nigro, and M. Petrelli, “Activities relocation for a sustainable mobility system,” Transportation Research Procedia, vol. 5, pp. 4–12, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2015.01.012.
  5. S. Gori, M. Nigro, and M. Petrelli, “The impact of land use characteristics for sustainable mobility: The case study of Rome,” European Transport Research Review, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 153–166, 2012, doi: 10.1007/s12544-012-0077-6.
  6. A. E. Dunning, “Impacts of transit in national parks and gateway communities,” Transportation Research Record, no. 1931, pp. 129–136, 2005, doi: 10.3141/1931-16.
  7. D. Hopkins, “Sustainable mobility at the interface of transport and tourism: Introduction to the special issue on ‘Innovative approaches to the study and practice of sustainable transport, mobility and tourism,’” Journal of Sustainable Tourism, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 225–239, 2019, doi: 10.1080/09669582.2019.1691800.
  8. T. H. Setiawan, H. P. H. Putro, and P. Pradono, “Sustainable Vacation Industry Mobility Criteria in Heritage Cultural Natural Conserved Areas,” International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 2089–2095, 2021, doi: 10.18517/IJASEIT.11.5.13620.
  9. F. Krüger et al., “The Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) in Dar es Salaam: A Pilot Study on Critical Infrastructure, Sustainable Urban Development and Livelihoods,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 1058, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13031058.
  10. N. Huy Nghia, T. Sy Sua, and N. Minh Hieu, “Evaluating the maiden BRT corridor in Vietnam,” Transport and Communications Science Journal, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 336–346, 2020, doi: 10.25073/tcsj.71.4.3.
  11. M. K. Devi, R. Safitri, and F. Fanani, “Does Continuous Improvement Can Push BRT Ridership?(Case study of BRT TransJakarta),” IJTI International Journal of Transportation and Infrastructure, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 169–178, 2021, doi: 10.29138/ijti.v4i2.1296.
  12. E. Vergel-Tovar and J. D. Landis, “Bus Rapid Transit-the affordable transit megaproject alternative,” in Megaprojects for Megacities, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2022, pp. 236–274.
  13. M. C. Adriana, M. Rizki, and T. B. Joewono, “Investigating Satisfaction and Its Determinants of BRT-Lite Services in Indonesian Cities,” Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, vol. 13, pp. 1447–1468, 2019, doi: 10.11175/easts.13.1447.
  14. H. Y. Saputra and I. F. Radam, “Accessibility model of BRT stop locations using Geographically Weighted regression (GWR): A case study in Banjarmasin, Indonesia,” International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijtst.2022.07.002.
  15. S. Sony, A. I. Rifai, and S. Handayani, “The Effectiveness Analysis of Bus Rapid Transit Services (A Case Trans Semarang, Indonesia),” Citizen: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 712–719, 2022, doi: 10.53866/jimi.v2i5.184.
  16. D. W. Karmiadji et al., “Evaluation of Operational Loading of the Light-Rail Transit (LRT) in Capital Region, Indonesia,” Automotive Experiences 104 Automotive Experiences, vol. 3, no. 3, 2020, doi: 10.31603/ae.v3i3.3882.
  17. D. W. Karmiadji, B. Haryanto, O. Ivano, M. Perkasa, and A. R. Farid, “Bogie Frame Structure Evaluation for Light-Rail Transit (LRT) Train: A Static Testing,” Automotive Experiences, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 36–43, 2021, doi: 10.31603/ae.4252.
  18. D. W. Karmiadji et al., “Verification of urban light rail transit (LRT) bogie frame structure design lifetime under variable fatigue loads,” Mechanical Engineering for Society and Industry, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 42–53, 2022, doi: 10.31603/mesi.6938.
  19. M. Setiyo and B. Waluyo, “Captain Seat: Smart Solution for Physical Distancing on Buses During the Covid-19 Pandemic,” Automotive Experiences, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2021, doi: 10.31603/ae.4383.
  20. R. Rusdjijati, S. A. Subrata, Z. B. Pambuko, M. Setiyo, and M. Noga, “Strategy for Safe Passenger Transport during the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Review to Recommendation,” Automotive Experiences, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 90–102, 2022, doi: 10.31603/ae.6593.
  21. J. Juanita, T. H. Setiawan, and A. Ma’ruf, “The Operational Performance of Mass Transportation Before Covid-19 and New Normal Life: Case Study BRT TransJateng, Central Java,” Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 361–366, 2021, doi: 10.25046/aj060342.
  22. L. A. Guzman and S. Gomez Cardona, “Density-oriented public transport corridors: Decoding their influence on BRT ridership at station-level and time-slot in Bogotá,” Cities, vol. 110, p. 103071, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2020.103071.
  23. L. A. Guzman, H. D. Enríquez, and P. Hessel, “BRT system in Bogotá and urban effects: More residential land premiums?,” Research in Transportation Economics, vol. 90, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2021.101039.
  24. L. Prayogi, “The Influence of Bus Rapid Transit System on Urban Development : An Inquiry to Boston and Seoul BRT Systems ’ Performance Indicators,” International Journal of Built Environment and Scientic Research, vol. 01, no. 01, pp. 1–8, 2017, doi: 10.24853/ijbesr.1.01.1-8.
  25. R. Khare, V. G. K. Villuri, and D. Chaurasia, “Urban sustainability assessment: The evaluation of coordinated relationship between BRTS and land use in transit-oriented development mode using DEA model,” Ain Shams Engineering Journal, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 107–117, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2020.08.012.
  26. Juanita, B. Kombaitan, I. P. Kusumantoro, and H. P. H. Putro, “Motivasi dan pola perjalanan wisatawan pengguna kendaraan tradisional,” in Prosiding Simposium Forum Studi Transportasi antar Perguruan Tinggi, 2019, pp. 19–20.
  27. A. Scuttari, M. Della Lucia, and U. Martini, “Integrated Planning of Sustainable Tourism and Mobility : An Exploratory Study,” Mobilities and Sustainable Tourism, pp. 161–181, 2013, doi: 10.1080/09669582.2013.786083.
  28. L. Lumsdon and S. J. Page, Tourism and Transport: Issues and Agenda for The New Millennium, First Edit. Elsevier, 2004.
  29. X. Li, Y. Liu, Z. Gao, and D. Liu, “International Journal of Transportation Linkage between passenger demand and surrounding land-use patterns at urban rail transit stations : A canonical correlation analysis method and case study in Chongqing,” International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 10–16, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.ijtst.2016.06.002.
  30. H. Haghshenas and M. Vaziri, “Urban sustainable transportation indicators for global comparison,” Ecological Indicators, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 115–121, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.09.010.
  31. M. Veruswati, A. Asyary, R. D. Alnur, and G. Guspianto, “Correlation between local eid-al-fitr homecoming (Mudik) with coronavirus disease-19 during ramadhan season amidst large-scale social distancing in Indonesia,” Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 8, no. T1, pp. 570–573, 2020, doi: 10.3889/OAMJMS.2020.5369.
  32. S. Nugroho and S. Suprapto, “Potensi Daerah Purwokerto (Analisis Kesiapan Menjadi Kota Purwokerto),” Eko-Regional, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 266590, 2007, doi: 10.20884/1.ERJPE.2007.2.1.370.
  33. S. Hermawati and Y. Milawaty, “Potensi Industri Pariwisata Kabupaten Banyumas,” Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Bisnis, vol. 21, no. 3, p. 96961, 2016, doi: 10.35760/eb.
  34. D. S. Vale, “Transit-oriented development, integration of land use and transport, and pedestrian accessibility: Combining node-place model with pedestrian shed ratio to evaluate and classify station areas in Lisbon,” Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 45, pp. 70–80, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.04.009.
  35. A. Galelo, A. Ribeiro, and L. M. Martinez, “Measuring and Evaluating the Impacts of TOD Measures – Searching for Evidence of TOD Characteristics in Azambuja Train Line,” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 111, pp. 899–908, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.124.
  36. E. Martin and S. Shaheen, “The impact of carsharing on public transit and non-motorized travel: An exploration of North American carsharing survey data,” Energies, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 2094–2114, 2011, doi: 10.3390/en4112094.
  37. M. S.-U. Rahman, P. Timms, and F. Montgomery, “Integrating BRT Systems with Rickshaws in Developing Cities to Promote Energy Efficient Travel,” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 54, pp. 261–274, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.745.
  38. H. Schalekamp and R. Behrens, “Engaging paratransit on public transport reform initiatives in South Africa: A critique of policy and an investigation of appropriate engagement approaches,” Research in Transportation Economics, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 371–378, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2010.07.047.
  39. M. Sidloski and E. Diab, “Understanding the Effectiveness of Bus Rapid Transit Systems in Small and Medium-Sized Cities in North America,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, vol. 2674, no. 10, pp. 831–845, 2020, doi: 10.1177/0361198120940993.
  40. BPS Kabupaten Banyumas, Kabupaten Banyumas dalam Angka 2021. Banyumas: BPS Banyumas, 2021.
  41. F. Lo Feudo, “How to Build an Alternative to Sprawl and Auto-centric Development Model through a TOD Scenariofor the North-Pas-de-Calais Region? Lessons from an Integrated Transportation-land Use Modelling,” Transportation Research Procedia, vol. 4, pp. 154–177, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2014.11.013.
  42. M. Isa, M. H. Isa, and K. D. M. E. Handayeni, “Keterkaitan Karakteristik Kawasan Transit berdasarkan Prinsip Transit Oriented Development (TOD) terhadap Tingkat Penggunaan Kereta Komuter Koridor Surabaya-Sidoarjo,” Jurnal Teknik ITS, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. C196–C201, 2014, doi: 10.12962/j23373539.v3i2.7275.
  43. E. Guerra and R. Cervero, “Cost of a ride,” Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 267–290, 2011, doi: 10.1080/01944363.2011.589767.
  44. V. Chakour and N. Eluru, “Examining the Influence of Urban form and Land Use on Bus Ridership in Montreal,” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 104, pp. 875–884, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.182.
  45. Y. Wang, L. Li, X. Zhu, B. Wu, and L. Li, “Evaluation of urban redevelopment impact on non-motorized traffic,” Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 187–197, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.jtte.2015.03.007.
  46. T. Kim, D. Sohn, and S. Choo, “An Analysis of the Relationship between Pedestrian Traffic Volumes and Built Environment Around Metro Stations in Seoul,” Transportation Engineering, vol. i, no. 0000, pp. 1–10, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s12205-016-0915-5.
  47. L. Wood, J. Hine, G. Currie, B. Giles-corti, and G. Turrell, “Patterns of social capital associated with transit oriented development,” Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 35, pp. 144–155, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.02.003.
  48. R. Cervero and D. Dai, “BRT TOD : Leveraging transit oriented development with bus rapid transit investments,” Transport Policy, vol. 36, pp. 127–138, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.08.001.