Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 882 Download : 387

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Multi-bridge centralized drive wheel loaders can produce parasitic power to waste energy and aggravate tire wear. Distributed Electric Wheel Loader(DEWL) is a new structure with two drive motors that can be controlled independently or in concert. Hence, this study investigates the mechanical characteristics of DEWL in its shoveling condition. Firstly, for the DEWL, dynamic models are established including running and shoveling conditions, on the basis of automobile theory. Secondly, a simplified structural model of DEWL is used to construct the mechanical equations, and the theoretical derivation is utilized to analyze the forces on wheels during different driving modes of running and shoveling conditions. Finally, the free shoveling of dry sands and gravel materials is tested by a ZL50GV-EV DEWL, and the drive forces of three drive modes on horizontal concrete pavement are tested. The results show that the parasitic power is generated when the driving motor has a larger speed than that of the other motor, which is caused by the movement of the loader's center of gravity. The driving torques generated by the motors are basically the same when the DEWL is in front-drive mode and rear-drive mode at the setting speed of 600rpm, whether it is running forward or backward, with a torque fluctuation of 0.16%-1.28% and a power fluctuation of 0.02%-1.29%. The DEWL consumes more power in dual-drive mode than in single drive if it is controlled in speed-target mode.

Keywords

Electric wheel loader Parasitic power Shoveling condition Force analysis Mechanical characteristics

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

  1. S. Dadhich, U. Bodin, and U. Andersson, “Key challenges in automation of earth-moving machines,” Automation in Construction, vol. 68, pp. 212–222, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2016.05.009.
  2. S.-H. Lee, C.-S. Song, and C.-K. Chung, “The Characteristic Analysis of the Load-sensitive Hydraulic Control System for Closed Center Type of a Wheel Loader,” Transactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers A, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 934–942, 2007, doi: 10.3795/KSME-A.2007.31.9.934.
  3. W. Zongcai, F. Wude, W. Yun, and L. Zhengguo, “Study on hydraulic system energy saving features for wheel loader typical working condition,” Hydraulic Pneumatic & Seals, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 40–42, 2017.
  4. X. Yan, J. Yang, and L. Quan, “Co-simulation and experiment of wheel loader during operation process,” Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, vol. 31, no. 16, pp. 102–109, 2015, doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.16.015.
  5. M. Bhola, A. Kumar, and N. Kumar, “Energy-efficient control of hydrostatic transmission of a front-end loader machine using machine learning algorithm and its sensitivity analysis,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, p. 09544070221133154, 2022, doi: 10.1177/09544070221133154.
  6. L. Wan, H. Dai, Q. Zeng, Z. Sun, and M. Tian, “Characteristic analysis and co-validation of hydro-mechanical continuously variable transmission based on the wheel loader,” Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 17, p. 5900, 2020, doi: 10.3390/app10175900.
  7. M. Guangliang, W. Liang, and L. Yingying, “Wheel loader engine multi-power mode energy-saving research,” Construction Machinery and Equipment, vol. 40, no. 03, pp. 20-24+90, 2009.
  8. L. Yanhui, L. Chang, and Y. Guoxiu, “Simulation and experimental study on engine power saving of loader,” Construction Machinery, vol. 01, pp. 51-53+58, 2017, doi: 10.14189/j.cnki.cm1981.2017.01.004.
  9. W. Haifei, Y. Shuxin, K. Yan, L. Xinwei, Z. Zhonghua, and M. Yangpan, “Simulative research on hydraulic mechanical composite transmission energy-saving system for ZL50 loader,” Xi’an University of Arch & Tech (natural science edition), vol. 47, no. 01, pp. 141–146, 2015, doi: 10.15986/j.1006-7930.2015.01.026.
  10. L. Luo, P.-Y. Wang, W. Sun, M.-L. Ba, Z.-H. You, and X. He, “Research on the energy-saving mechanism for the hybrid mechanical loader with parallel power system,” in Design, Manufacturing and Mechatronics: Proceedings of the International Conference on Design, Manufacturing and Mechatronics (ICDMM2016), 2017, pp. 282–289, doi: 10.1142/9789813208322_0033.
  11. Z. Lin, F. Wang, and B. Xu, “Improving wheel loader energy efficiency with a series electric hybrid powertrain,” in Fluid Power Systems Technology, 2022, vol. 86335, p. V001T01A019, doi: 10.1115/FPMC2022-8909.
  12. G. Wu, X. Zhang, and Z. Dong, “Powertrain architectures of electrified vehicles: Review, classification and comparison,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 352, no. 2, pp. 425–448, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2014.04.018.
  13. X. Jin, L. Shi, and Y. Bian, “Design and research on wheel-driven systems of electric loaders,” Chinese Journal of Construction Machinery, vol. 8, no. 01, pp. 62-65+71, 2010, doi: 10.15999/j.cnki.311926.2010.01.017.
  14. B. Yang, M. Huang, L. H, and J. Zhang, “Comparative Test Research on Performance of Electric Loader and Traditional Loader,” Construction Machinery Technology & Management, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 94–98, 2020.
  15. X. Li, C. Duan, K. Bai, and Z. Yao, “Operating performance of pure electric loaders with different types of motors based on simulation analysis,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 3, p. 617, 2021, doi: 10.3390/en14030617.
  16. B. Cao, X. Liu, W. Chen, K. Yang, and D. Liu, “Intelligent energy-saving operation of wheel loader based on identifiable materials,” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, vol. 34, pp. 1081–1090, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s12206-020-0209-1.
  17. Z. Yang, J. Wang, G. Gao, and X. Shi, “Research on Optimized Torque-Distribution Control Method for Front/Rear Axle Electric Wheel Loader,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2017, p. 7076583, 2017, doi: 10.1155/2017/7076583.
  18. G. Gao, J. Wang, T. Ma, Y. Han, X. Yang, and X. Li, “Optimisation strategy of torque distribution for the distributed drive electric wheel loader based on the estimated shovelling load,” Vehicle System Dynamics, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 2036–2054, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1080/00423114.2021.1890153.
  19. P. T. Petrović, Ž. P. Petrović, D. M. Obradović, and M. P. Petrović, “Dynamics of the tractor (4x2), and the occurrence of parasitic power circulation in the drive (4x4),” Tehnika, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 281–287, 2015, doi: 10.5937/tehnika1502281P.
  20. V. V Vantsevich, “Power losses and energy efficiency of multi-wheel drive vehicles: A method for evaluation,” Journal of Terramechanics, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 89–101, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.jterra.2008.08.001.
  21. Y. Zhiyu, L. Shuang, W. Yunlong, and Y. Han, “Generation Mechanism Analysis and Calculation Method of Loader Parasitic Power Based on Tire Radius Difference,” SAE Technical Paper, 2022. doi: 10.4271/2022-01-5102.
  22. H. Mu, Y. Luo, Y. Luo, and L. Chen, “Numerical analysis of energy recovery of hybrid loader actuators based on parameters optimization,” in Actuators, 2022, vol. 11, no. 9, p. 260, doi: 10.3390/act11090260.
  23. J. Liu, Z.-J. Niu, H. Zhu, and C.-S. Zhao, “Design and experiment of a large-aperture hollow traveling wave ultrasonic motor with low speed and high torque,” Applied Sciences, vol. 9, no. 19, p. 3979, 2019, doi: 10.3390/app9193979.
  24. K. Pettersson and P. Krus, “Design optimization of complex hydromechanical transmissions,” Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 135, no. 9, p. 91005, 2013, doi: 10.1115/1.4024732.
  25. J. Yao, Z. Li, and C. Peng, “Shoveling behavior and resistance of loader bucket,” Construction Machinery and Equipment, no. 03, pp. 9-14+4-48, 1993.
  26. J. Xiaolin, S. Laide, and B. Yongming, “Design and research on wheel-driven systems of electric loaders,” Chinese Journal of Construction Machinery, vol. 8, no. 01, pp. 62-65+71, 2010, doi: 10.15999/j.cnki.311926.2010.01.017.
  27. K. Oh, H. Kim, K. Ko, P. Kim, and K. Yi, “Integrated wheel loader simulation model for improving performance and energy flow,” Automation in Construction, vol. 58, pp. 129–143, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2015.07.021.
  28. I. Shafikhani, “Energy management of hybrid electric vehicles with battery aging considerations: Wheel loader case study,” Control Engineering Practice, vol. 110, p. 104759, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2021.104759.
  29. T. Lin, Y. Lin, H. Ren, H. Chen, Q. Chen, and Z. Li, “Development and key technologies of pure electric construction machinery,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 132, p. 110080, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110080.
  30. M. Mitschke and H. Wallentowitz, Dynamik der kraftfahrzeuge, vol. 4. Springer, 1972.
  31. D. E. Hall and J. C. Moreland, “Fundamentals of rolling resistance,” Rubber chemistry and technology, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 525–539, 2001, doi: 10.5254/1.3547650.
  32. Y. Yu, L. Shen, and M. Li, “Optimum design of working device of wheel loader,” in 2010 International Conference on Mechanic Automation and Control Engineering, 2010, pp. 461–465, doi: 10.1109/MACE.2010.5536399.
  33. M. Guiggiani, “The science of vehicle dynamics,” Pisa, Italy: Springer Netherlands, vol. 15, 2014.
  34. A. L. Schwab, J. P. Meijaard, and J. D. G. Kooijman, “Lateral dynamics of a bicycle with a passive rider model: stability and controllability,” Vehicle system dynamics, vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 1209–1224, 2012, doi: 10.1080/00423114.2011.610898.
  35. X. Fei, Y. Han, and S. V. Wong, “An Overview of and Prospects for Research on Energy Savings in Wheel Loaders,” Automotive Experiences, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 133–148, 2023, doi: 10.31603/ae.8759.
  36. S. Murata, “Innovation by in-wheel-motor drive unit,” Vehicle System Dynamics, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 807–830, 2012, doi: 10.1080/00423114.2012.666354.
  37. M. N. Kumar, V. Jagota, and M. Shabaz, “Retrospection of the optimization model for designing the power train of a formula student race car,” Scientific Programming, vol. 2021, pp. 1–9, 2021.
  38. E. A. Abdelaziz, R. Saidur, and S. Mekhilef, “A review on energy saving strategies in industrial sector,” Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 150–168, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2010.09.003.
  39. Z. Wu, F. Wang, B. Xu, and W. Fiebig, “An Electric-Hydraulic Hybrid Wheel Loader With Mode-Driven Control Strategy,” in Fluid Power Systems Technology, 2022, vol. 86335, p. V001T01A047, doi: 10.1115/FPMC2022-90715.
  40. H. Zhang, F. Wang, B. Xu, and W. Fiebig, “Extending battery lifetime for electric wheel loaders with electric-hydraulic hybrid powertrain,” Energy, vol. 261, p. 125190, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125190.

Most read articles by the same author(s)