Main Article Content

Abstract

The low interest of high school students in civil engineering is a concern, as this field is crucial for infrastructure development. This community engagement program aimed to enhance the interest and understanding of civil engineering among students at SMAN 78 Jakarta through an innovative introductory program. The methods employed included interactive presentations on civil engineering, discussions, Q&A sessions, and evaluations. The results showed that 100% of students expressed a desire to learn more about civil engineering through follow-up activities, and 76.9% of students reported a better understanding of the field compared to before. Furthermore, 65.4% of students demonstrated increased interest in civil engineering, although the majority still placed it as a second or lower-choice major. The implications of this community service activity are increased awareness and interest among students in the field of civil engineering. However, to achieve a more significant shift in major selection, a more comprehensive approach is needed, such as more intensive career guidance, direct involvement with professionals, and more realistic work simulations.

Keywords

Introduction to civil engineering Student interest Education

Article Details

References

  1. Ariani, N. D., & Suciptaningsih, O. A. (2023). Analisis Pengaruh Media Pembelajaran Interaktif dalam Meningkatkan Minat Belajar Pembelajaran IPS Sekolah Dasar. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(6), 2834–2847.
  2. Ghofar, W. . M. A., Setiawan, A. H., & Siswanto, B. (2023). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Augmented Reality (AR) Berbasis Android pada Mata Pelajaran Konstruksi Jalan dan Jembatan Kelas XII SMKN 2 Surakarta. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Teknik Dan Kejuruan, 16(2), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.20961/jiptek.v18i2.93304
  3. Gille, M., Moulignier, R., & Kövesi, K. (2022). Understanding the factors influencing students’ choice of engineering school. European Journal of Engineering Education, 47(2), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2021.1993795
  4. Hansen, S., Rostiyanti, S. F., Fassa, F., Koesalamwardi, A. B., Setiawan, A. F., & Suwito. (2024). Analisis Minat Melanjutkan Pendidikan Peserta Didik SMK Bidang Konstruksi di Jakarta. Architecture Innovation, 7(2), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.36766/aij.v7i2.416
  5. Herlina, L., Kurniyaningrum, E., Kawanda, A., Putri, L. R., & Misshuari, W. (2025). Introduction to the role of civil engineering in infrastructure development for students of SMAN 3 Jakarta. Community Empowermant, 10(1), 86–91. https://doi.org/10.31603/ce.12159
  6. Lester, D. (2022). Factors influencing civil engineering university students’ decision making. European Journal of Engineering Education, 47(6), 970–985. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2022.2052810
  7. Lima, R. M., Andersson, P. H., & Saalman, E. (2017). Active Learning in Engineering Education: a (re)introduction. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2016.1254161
  8. Making, M. Y. M., & Hariyanto, V. L. (2016). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Mekanika Teknik Berbasis Videoscribe dan Aurora 3D Presentation Pada Materi Konstruksi Pelengkung Tiga Sendi. Jurnal Elektronik Mahasiswa Pendidikan Teknik Sipil, 4(1).
  9. Marchiori, R. S., & Song, S. (2024). A Game-Based Learning Method to Promote Soft Skills in Construction Education. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--46443
  10. Muharromah, H. G., & Wiyono, A. (2022). Pengaruh Minat dalam Memilih Program Keahlian Teknik Konstruksi dan Properti Pengaruh Minat dalam Memilih Program Keahlian Teknik Konstruksi dan Properti terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa Kelas X TKP SMK Negeri 1 Sidoarjo. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Teknik Bangunan (JKPTB), 8(2), 1–9.
  11. Nikolić, D., Maftei, L., & Whyte, J. (2019). Becoming familiar: How infrastructure engineers begin to use collaborative virtual reality in their interdisciplinary practice. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 24, 489–508. https://doi.org/10.36680/J.ITCON.2019.026
  12. Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x
  13. SMAN 78 Jakarta. (2024). SMAN 78 Jakarta.
  14. Solissa, E. M., Rakhmawati, E., Maulinda, R., Syamsuri, S., & Putri, I. D. A. (2024). Analisis Implementasi Metode Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek dalam Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar di Sekolah Dasar. Al-Madrasah Jurnal Pendidikan Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 8(2), 558. https://doi.org/10.35931/am.v8i2.3284
  15. Wang, X., Dai, M., & Mathis, R. (2022). The influences of student- and school-level factors on engineering undergraduate student success outcomes: A multi-level multi-school study. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00338-y
  16. Yadav, A., Subedi, D., Lundeberg. Mary A., & Bunting, C. F. (2011). Problem-based Learning: Influence on Students’ Learning in an Electrical Engineering Course. Journal of Engineering Education 100(2):253-280. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 253–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00013.x
  17. Yulianti, R. D., & Syah, N. (2019). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Minat Siswa SMP dan MTs Dalam Memilih Jurusan Teknik Konstruksi dan Properti di SMK. CIVED, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.24036/cived.v6i3.106231
  18. Zubair, M. U., Khan, M. A., Hassan, M. U., Ahmed, K., & Aziz, T. (2024). Enhancing Student Active Engagement in Class through Game-Based Learning: A Case of Civil Engineering Education. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16146010