Article Sidebar
Downloads
Main Article Content
Abstract
Siswa hadir di sekolah berharap mendapatkan layanan pendidikan secara komprehensif sehingga dapat memiliki sejumlah kompetensi setelah belajar usai, namun untuk mewujudkan harapan tersebut pihak sekolah tidak mudah untuk merealisasikan. Penelitian ini bertujuan merealisasikan sejumlah harapan tersebut melalui penyusunan kurikulum SKS dengan melakukan konversi dan pemetaan materi ajar serta pemampatan. Metode yang diterapkan menggunakan riset kualitatif dan metode pengumpulan data interview, dokumen dan observasi dengan flow analysis. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa sekolah madrasah yang menerapkan kurikulum SKS menjadi sasaran penelitian ini dapat mewujudkan beberapa harapan dari siswa sehingga tidak hanya sukses berprestasi dalam UN, tetapi juga dapat meraih sekolah dan atau jurusan favorit di perguruan tinggi terkenal. Metode yang digunakan untuk mewujudkan munculnya kurikulum SKS madrasah yang dapat mewujudkan banyak harapan tersebut dengan menghitung saldo waktu belajar dan efisiensi tatap muka di kelas.
Keywords
Article Details
References
-
David, Scott. 2016. New Perspectives on Curriculum, Learning and Assessment. New York: Springer.
F. Barkley and K. Cross. 2005. Collaborative learning techniques: A Handbook for college faculty. San Fransisco: Jossey Bass.
Fink, lee, De. 2003. Creating significant learing experiences: An Integrated approach to designing college course. San Fransisco: Jossey bass.
Gavin, Duffy. 2017. Share Education in Contested spaces: How Collaborative networks improve Communities and Schools. Journal Education Change (2017) 18.107-134. DOI 10.1007/s10833-016-9279-3
Iztok, Devetak and Vogrine, Janez. 2013. The Criteria for Evaluating the quality of the Science textbooks. New York: Springer.
Joyce, Mclead. 2003. The Key element of classroom management- managing time and space, student behavior and instructional strategies. Alexandria: ASCD.
L. Gay, R., G. Mill and P. Airasian. 2006. Educational Research: Competences for Analysis and Application. New Jersey: Parson Prentice Hall.
Lawrence, M, and M. Keith. 2007. Reserach methods in Education.Canada: Routledge.
Martinez, Gracia and Quilez, Gil. 2006. Analysis of molecular genetic content in Spanish secondary school textbooks. Journal of Biological Education, 2006. 40 (2). 35-60
Myint, Swe, Khine. 2016. Critical Analysis of Science Textbooks, Evaluating Instructional Effectiveness. New York: Springer.
ND. Tvorogova. 2017. Higher Education Institution and Its Representative, Which Applicats have their Trust in. Journal of Advance in Social Science and Humanities. 2017. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15520/jassh33198
O’Brian, Grunert, Judith. 2008. The Course Syllabus, A Learner Centerend Approarch. San Fransisco; Jossey bass.
Patrick, Griffin. 2012. Assessment and Teaching of 21 st Century Skills. New York: Springer.
Robert J. Marzano. What Works in Schools, Translating Research into Action. Alexandria; ASCD.2003
S. Irez. 2009. Nature of Science as depicted in Turkish Biology textbooks. Science Education. 2009. 93 (3) 422-447
Thalib, Husen. 1976. International Study of Achievement in Mathematics (vol.2) New York: John Willey and Sons.
Thomas, Theda. Designing First year Sociology Curricula and Practice. Asian Social Science. Vol. 13, No. 4. 2017. DOI: 10.5539/ass.v13n4pl.
Tomlinson, Ann Carol.(2008). The Differentiated School, Makin Revolutionary Changes in teaching and learning. New York: ASCD.
Tomlinson, Ann Carol.2000. Leadership for differentiating school and classroom. Alexandria: ASCD.
Tomlinson, Ann Carol.2010. Leading and managing A Differentiated Classroom. Alexandria; ASCD.
Walberg, Herbert. 1997. Uncompetitive America Schools: causes and cures. In Brookings papers on Educational Policy, Washington DC: The Brookings Instituite.
Whitener, Ellen. 1989. A Meta analytic review of the effect on learning of the interaction between prior achievement and instructional support. Review of the educational research, 1989. 59 (65-86)