Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 742 Download : 652

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The pace of technological development can no longer be restrained until the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI), which later turns out to negatively impact its application. AI is a computer system program created by humans. On the one hand, the invention of AI makes human work easier. On the other hand, it is also noticeable that there are several criminal cases "performed" by AI. This research is qualitative research with doctrinal approach. The data used include secondary data consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The method of data collection is done through document study. The research concludes that the inventor of an invention of artificial intelligence can be charged with legal responsibility by applying the limits of liability both in civil and penal sanction. Further studies are needed to answer the question of how far this responsibility can be carried out.

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence Legal Liability Inventor Invention

Article Details

References

  1. Abbott, Ryan. “I Think, Therefore I Invent: Creative Computers and the Future of Patent Law.” SSRN Electronic Journal 40 (2016): 1079–1126. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2727884.
  2. Abbott, Ryan Benjamin, and Alex F. Sarch. “Punishing Artificial Intelligence: Legal Fiction or Science Fiction.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2019, 323–84. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3327485.
  3. Abidin, Zainal. “Pertanggungjawaban Terhadap Delik-Delik Ekonomi.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 12, no. 1 (February 1982): 1. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol12.no1.891.
  4. Adil, Soetan K. Malikoel. Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Dalam Hukum Pidana. Bandung: STHB, 1995.
  5. Andrisman, Tri. Hukum Pidana: Asas-Asas Dan Aturan Umum Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Banda Lampung: Universitas Lampung, 2009.
  6. “Artificial Intelligence, What It Is and Why It Matters,” n.d.
  7. Atmasasmita, Romli. Asas-Asas Perbandingan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Yayasan lembaga Bantuan Hukum Indonesia, 1989.
  8. Aulia Ali Reza. Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Dalam Rancangan KUHP. Jakarta: Institute for Criminal Justice Reform, 2015.
  9. Barda Nawawi Arif. Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2003.
  10. Chairul Huda. Dari Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan Menuju Kepada Tiada Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan: Tinjauan Kritis Terhadap Teori Pemisahan Tindak Pidana Dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana. Jakarta: Kencana, 2006.
  11. Chesterman, Simon. “Autonomy.” In We, the Robots?, 31–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009047081.004.
  12. Chesterman, Simon. We, the Robots? Cambridge University Press, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009047081.
  13. Cristina de Maglie. “Models of Corporate Criminal Liability in Comparative Law.” Washington University Global Studies Law Review 4, no. 3 (2005): 556.
  14. Diamantis, Mihailis E. “Corporate Criminal Minds.” Notre Dame Law Review 91, no. 5 (2016).
  15. Diamantis, Mihailis E. “Vicarious Liability of AI, Cambridge Handbook of AI and Law (Kristin Johnson & Carla Reyes Eds., 2022, Forthcoming),” 2021.
  16. Djumhana dan Djubaedillah. Hak Milik Intelektual Sejarah, Teori, Dan Praktiknya Di Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2012.
  17. Dwi Murdaningsih. “Novel Yang Ditulis Robot Lolos Kompetisi Sastra Di Jepang,” 2016.
  18. Dwi Putro, Widodo. “Disrupsi Dan Masa Depan Profesi Hukum.” Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 32, no. 1 (February 2020): 19. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.42928.
  19. Hallevy, Gabriel. “The Criminal Liability of Artificial Intelligence Entities - from Science Fiction to Legal Social Control.” Akron Intellectual Property Journal 4, no. 2 (2010): 1.
  20. Hans Kelsen. General Theory of Law and State. Bandung: Nusa Media, 1995.
  21. Hieariej, Eddy. Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2016.
  22. Hwian Christianto. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Rumah Sakit Atas Tindakan Tenaga Kesehatan Menurut UU No. 44 Tahun 2009.” Jurnal Yustika 14, no. 1 (2011): 8.
  23. Jimmy Tawalujan. “Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Terhadap Korban Kejahatan.” Lex Crimen 1 No 3, no. Juli-September (2012).
  24. Kristian. Kebijakan Eksekusi: Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Berbagai Putusan Pengadilan Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2018.
  25. Kristian, Kristian. “Urgensi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 43, no. 4 (December 2013): 546. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol43.no4.1501.
  26. Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright (n.d.).
  27. Lewokeda, Melansari D. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Tindak Terkait Pemberian Delegasi Kewenangan.” Mimbar Keadilan 14, no. 28 (August 2018). https://doi.org/10.30996/mk.v0i0.1779.
  28. Moeljatno. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. 6th ed. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 1993.
  29. Moeljatno. Pertanggungjawaban Dalam Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2015.
  30. Muladi dan Dwidja Priyatno. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi. Jakarta: Kencana, 2010.
  31. Munajat, Makhrus. Hukum Pidana Islam. Yogyakarta: Teras, 2009.
  32. Prasetyo, Teguh. Hukum Pidana. Depok: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2010.
  33. Salam, Abd. “Corporation Crime Liability of Perspective Penal Reform.” Journal of Humanity 01, no. 01 (July 2013): 07–19. https://doi.org/10.14724/01.02.
  34. Samoili, S., Lopez Cobo, M., Gomez Gutierrez, E., De Prato, G., Martinez-Plumed, F. and Delipetrev, B. “AI WATCH. Defining Artificial Intelligence,” 2020. https://doi.org/10.2760/382730.
  35. Setyawan, Vincentius Patria. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Partai Politik Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Justitia et Pax 35, no. 1 (September 2019). https://doi.org/10.24002/jep.v35i1.2070.
  36. Sofyan, Ahmad. Ajaran Kausalitas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Kencana, 2020.
  37. Sutan Remy Sjahdeini. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi. Jakarta: Grafiti Pers, 2006.
  38. Turing, A M. “I.—Computing Machinery and Intelligence.” Mind LIX, no. 236 (October 1950): 433–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433.
  39. “World’s First Patent Awarded for an Invention Made by an AI Could Have Seismic Implications on IP Law,” 2021.
  40. Yanisky-Ravid, Shlomit, and Luis Antonio Velez- Hernandez. “Copyrightability of Artworks Produced by Creative Robots and Originality: The Formality-Objective Model.” Minnesota Journal of Law, Science, and Technology 19, no. 1 (2018).