Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 894 Download : 769

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to discuss the potential problem of auction fraud carried out by the @xxx Instagram account in terms of Islamic law and Indonesian law. The research method used is descriptive qualitative, through a normative juridical approach, and is complemented by the results of observations and interviews with sources. The results of this study indicate some indications of fraud. First, the seller creates a fake account and colludes with his friend to make a fake offer. Second, the seller who entrusted the goods to the @xxx Instagram account did not send the goods to the auction winner. Third, the seller of the @xxx Instagram account sells goods by mixing genuine and fake products. It is contrary to Islamic law, which prohibits any intentional fraudulent activity. Of the several acts of fraud committed by the perpetrators, they can be subject to Article 28 of the 2016 ITE Law, Article 378 of the Criminal Code, Law no. 20 of 2016 concerning Brands and Geographical Indications, Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions, and Article 16 of Law no. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection.

Keywords

Islamic Law Fraud Online Auction Instagram

Article Details

References

  1. Al-Asqolani, Ibnu Hajar. Bulughul Maram Kitab Al-Buyu’. Jakarta: Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyah, 2002.
  2. Amir, Rahma. “Jual Beli Lelang Dan Pelaksanaannya Di Kantor Pelayanan Kekayaan Negara Dan Lelang Kota Palopo (Studi Komparatif Hukum Islam.” Jurnal Al-Qadau: Peradilan Dan Hukum Keluarga Islam 5, no. 1 (2018): 93. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-qadau.v5i1.5667.
  3. Anowar, Farzana, and Samira Sadaoui. “Detection of Auction Fraud in Commercial Sites.” Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 15, no. 1 (2020): 81–98. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762020000100107.
  4. Anwar, Syamsul. Hukum Perjanjian Syariah Studi Tentang Akad Dalam Fikih Muamalat. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2007.
  5. Ark, Erumban, Corrado, And Levanon Van. “Navigating the New Digital Ekonomy: Driving Digital Growth and Productivity From Installation to Deployment,” 2016.
  6. Ayub, Muhammad. Understanding Islamic Finance. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2009.
  7. Azhar Alam and Yuli Tri Utami. “Unsur Riba Dalam Perbedaan Konsep Pinjaman Kredit Antar Rentenir Dan Bank Plecit.” Al-Kharaj: Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan Dan Bisnis 3, no. 1 (2021): 130–41. https://doi.org/10.47467/alkharaj.v3i1.240.
  8. Dalle, Jusman. “Menyoal Ekonomi Digital.” republika.co.id, 2016.
  9. Darwis, Nurley. “Kriminology Pada Bidang Kebijakan ‘Cyber Securty.’” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara 9, no. 2 (2014): 24–46. https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v9i2.353.
  10. Dzaky Adam Thamrin, Boby Habibi, Dewi Permata Sari, and Fauzul Hanif Noor Athief. “Analisis Strategi Islamic Collective Entrepreneurship (ICE): Solusi Mengatasi Desa Tertinggal.” Profetika 21, no. 1 (2020): 45–56.
  11. Edmon, Makarim. Kompilasi Hukum Telematika. Jakarta: Grafindo Persada, 2004.
  12. Fauzi, Satria Nur, and Lushiana Primasari. “Tindak Pidana Penipuan Dalam Transaksi Di Situs Jual Beli Online (E-Commerce).” Recidive 7, no. 3 (2018): 250–61.
  13. Febriandika, Nur Rizki, and Fifi Hakimi. “Analisis Kesesuaian Syariah Electronic Money Pada Bank Penerbit Uang Elektronik Di Inonesia.” An-Nisbah: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah 07, no. 01 (2020): 212–49.
  14. Hasan, Muhammad Ali. Berbagai Macam Transaksi Dalam Islam. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2003.
  15. Hendrik S., Anton. “Modus Operandi Dan Problematika Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Penipuan Daring.” Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 31, no. 1 (2019): 59. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.34786.
  16. Ibrahim, Johnny. Teori Dan Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia, 2005.
  17. Kakoe, Silvony, Masruchin Ruba I, and Abdul Madjid. “Perlindungan Hukum Korban Penipuan Transaksi Jual Beli Online Melalui Ganti Rugi Sebagai Pidana Tambahan.” Jurnal Legalitas 13, no. 2 (2020): 115–28.
  18. Karuniawan, Yusuf. Pandangan Hukum Islam Terhadap Praktek Jual Beli Online Dengan Sistem Lelang. Surakarta: IAIN Surakarta, 2017.
  19. Kementrian Komunikasi dan Informasi. “Perkembangan Ekonomi Digital Di Indonesia: Strategi Dan Sektor Potensial,” 2019, 1–68.
  20. Kemkominfo. “Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik.” UU No. 19 Tahun 2016, no. 1 (2016): 1–31.
  21. Kholiq, Mohamad Nur, Dinda Ajeng Puspanita, and Prawitra Thalib. “Copyright Protection of Art Containing Nudist Elements Under Positive Law In Indonesia.” Law and Justice 6, no. 2 (2022): 161–73. https://doi.org/10.23917/laj.v6i2.17480.
  22. Kyo M Dolan. “Internet Auction Fraud: The Silent Victims.” Journal of Economic Crime Management Winter 2, no. 1 (2004): 1–22.
  23. Larissa, Dea. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Korban Tindak Pidana Penipuan Jual Beli Online Di Indonesia” 4, no. 2 (2020): 219–27.
  24. Marzuki, Peter M. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2005.
  25. Moeljatno. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2007.
  26. Nur, Sahlan. “Perdagangan Sepatu Merek Terkenal Palsu Di Kota Medan Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Merek Dan Indikasi Geografis.” Universitas Negeri Medan, 2020.
  27. Permata, Marjo, Moch Djaiz. “Pelaksanaan Lelang Atas Barang Milik Daerah Melalui Internet (e-Auction) Oleh Kantor Pelayanan Kekayaan Negara Dan Lelang (KPKNL) Semarang.” Diponegoro Law Riview 5 (2016): 3.
  28. Poerana, Sigar Aji. “Hukumnya Membuat Banyak Akun Agar Mendapat Promo E-Commerce.” hukumonline.com, 2020.
  29. Prakoso, Bagus Andi Dwi, I Nyoman Sujana, and Luh Putu Suryani. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Penipuan Jual Beli Online.” Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum 1, no. 2 (2020): 266–70. https://doi.org/10.22225/jkh.2.1.2591.266-270.
  30. Prawesti, I. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Atas Penjualan Barang Bermerek Palsu Secara Online.” Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 2017, 1–8.
  31. Puspitaningrum, Suciati, and Cut Irna Setiawati. “Analisis 7 Atribut E-Commerce Berbasis Website Sebagai Dasar Preferensi Konsumen Di Kota Bandung Dengan Pendekatan Analisis Konjoin.” Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis 6 (2021): 151–67.
  32. Putri, Hafifah. “Jurnal Ilmiah FENOMENA, Volume XIV, Nomor 2, November 2016: 1554-1566” XIV, no. November (2016): 1554–66.
  33. Rabbani, Aletheia. “Pengertian Penelitian Lapangan, Hal Yang Diperlukan, Langkah, Catatan, Kelebihan Dan Kekurangannya.” sosial76.com, 2020.
  34. Sabiq, Sayyid. Fiqih Sunnah Jilid 5. Edited by Ahmad Dzulfikar dan Muhammad Khoyrurrijal. Depok: Keira Publishing, 2015.
  35. Solim, Jevlin, Mazmur Septian Rumapea, Agung Wijaya, Bella Monica, and Wendy Lionggodinata. “Upaya Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Penipuan Situs Jual Beli Online Di Indonesia.” Samudera Keadilan 5, no. 1 (2019): 96–109.
  36. Sumartono, Ari Suhartanto. “Tindak Penipuan Bisnis Online Dalam Kajian Perspektif Hukum Pidana Dan Sosiologi Pada Masyarakat Sosial Media.” Eduscotech 1, no. 1 (2019): 72–86.
  37. Sumenge, Melisa Monica. “Penipuan Menggunakan Media Internet Berpura Jual Beli Online.” Lex Crimen 4 (2013): 252.