Mechanical Engineering for Society and Industry

Articles

Electromechanical and CFD-coupled analysis of deflector-guided savonius pico-hydro turbine with quarter-circular blade rotors

Rinasa Agistya Anugrah , Sudarja , Yosef Budiman , Muhammad Yusri Ilyas

Published
July 22, 2026

Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Issue in Progress
Pages 362-382

DOI

Open Access
Share

Abstract

Global electricity demand continues to rise, increasing dependence on fossil fuels and accelerating greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to climate instability. Small-scale hydropower offers a clean alternative, particularly for distributed and space-constrained applications where conventional hydropower systems are difficult to implement. Among available concepts, the Savonius Pico-Hydro Turbine (SPHT) is attractive because of its simple structure, low production cost, and good self-starting capability. However, previous studies have mainly focused on mechanical performance, while the combined evaluation of mechanical response, electrical output, generator efficiency, and hydrodynamic flow behavior remains limited. The novelty of this study lies in the use of a quarter-circular blade profile instead of the commonly used semi-circular Savonius blade, combined with experimental electromechanical testing, CFD-based flow visualization, and deflector-angle variation. Two- and four-blade SPHT configurations were examined under realistic loading conditions, while CFD simulation was employed to clarify velocity distribution, pressure loading, momentum exchange, and deflector-guided flow patterns. The results showed that the four-blade rotor produced higher torque and a stronger electrical response than the two-blade rotor. CFD contour analysis supported these findings by showing stronger momentum exchange and more distributed pressure loading around the higher-solidity rotor. The deflector investigation further indicated that a 30° deflector angle provided the most effective flow redirection and pressure distribution among the evaluated cases. Overall, the proposed experimental and numerical framework provides a practical basis for optimizing quarter-circular SPHT design through blade configuration selection and deflector-angle tuning, supporting compact and reliable pico-scale clean energy generation for remote and low-infrastructure applications.

Keywords

CFD simulation; Deflector angle; Pico-hydro turbine; Savonius blade; Water flow

References

  1. [1] International Energy Agency, “Electricity – Global Energy Review 2025 – Analysis,” International Energy Agency. Accessed: Dec. 13, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-review-2025/electricity
  2. [2] Seetharaman, K. Moorthy, N. Patwa, Saravanan, and Y. Gupta, “Breaking barriers in deployment of renewable energy,” Heliyon, vol. 5, no. 1, p. e01166, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01166.
  3. [3] D. Mhlanga and E. Ndhlovu, “The Russia Ukraine War, Global Energy Supply, and Sustainable Development,” in Contributions to Political Science, 2024, pp. 263–280. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-63333-1_16.
  4. [4] Y. Budiman and A. Khoirunnisa’, “Predictive analysis of biofuel production in prominent Asian markets: Implications for renewable energy development (2045-2050),” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 1518, no. 1, p. 012009, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1518/1/012009.
  5. [5] R. Thomas et al., “Land instability Compounds the risk of sea level rise in Alexandria, Egypt,” International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, vol. 141, p. 104648, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2025.104648.
  6. [6] U. A. Bhatti et al., “Global production patterns: Understanding the relationship between greenhouse gas emissions, agriculture greening and climate variability,” Environmental Research, vol. 245, p. 118049, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.118049.
  7. [7] K. R. Shivanna, “Climate change and its impact on biodiversity and human welfare,” Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 160–171, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s43538-022-00073-6.
  8. [8] M. Taušová, M. Mykhei, K. Čulková, and P. Tauš, “Comparison of Renewable Energy Implementation in Geographically and Climatically Diverse Regions,” Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 7, p. 3098, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.3390/su17073098.
  9. [9] Å. Killingtveit, “Hydroelectric Power,” in Future Energy, Elsevier, 2020, pp. 315–330. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-102886-5.00015-3.
  10. [10] L. S. Paraschiv and S. Paraschiv, “Contribution of renewable energy (hydro, wind, solar and biomass) to decarbonization and transformation of the electricity generation sector for sustainable development,” Energy Reports, vol. 9, pp. 535–544, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2023.07.024.
  11. [11] Muhd Syukri Mohd Shamsuddin, Nujjiya Abdul Mu’in, and Noorfazreena Mohammad Kamaruddin, “Experimental Investigation of the Savonius Turbine for Low-Speed Hydrokinetic Applications in Small Rivers,” Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 29–46, May 2022, doi: 10.37934/arfmts.94.2.2946.
  12. [12] K. C. Sarma, B. Nath, A. Biswas, and R. D. Misra, “Design and performance investigation of a triple blade dual stage Savonius-alike hydrokinetic turbine from low flow stream reserves,” Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 12099–12117, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1080/15567036.2023.2268572.
  13. [13] M. Basumatary and A. Biswas, “Numerical simulation of two-bladed Savonius water turbine with deflector,” International Journal of Renewable Energy Technology, vol. 7, no. 4, p. 383, 2016, doi: 10.1504/IJRET.2016.080115.
  14. [14] B. Nath, A. Biswas, B. Das, and R. Dev Misra, “Design, optimization and analysis of a modified Savonius hydro-kinetic turbine (MSHT) with curved winglet and straight blade,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 314, p. 118699, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118699.
  15. [15] R. A. Anugrah, F. Yuafiq, M. Yusuf, M. H. Bin Peeie, and A. Yudianto, “Computational Fluid Dynamics of Savonius Water Turbine for Hydrokinetic Pico Hydro Systems,” BIO Web of Conferences, vol. 199, p. 02009, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1051/bioconf/202519902009.
  16. [16] E. Cuce and P. M. Cuce, “Approach of the solar chimney power plants by computational fluid dynamics (CFD),” in Solar Chimney Power Plants, Elsevier, 2025, pp. 139–170. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-443-24816-0.00007-3.
  17. [17] R. A. Anugrah, “Design of HAWT with solar panel for hybrid power plant,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, Aug. 2025, p. 090008. doi: 10.1063/5.0259874.
  18. [18] G. R. Hübner, H. Pinheiro, C. E. de Souza, C. M. Franchi, L. D. da Rosa, and J. P. Dias, “Detection of mass imbalance in the rotor of wind turbines using Support Vector Machine,” Renewable Energy, vol. 170, pp. 49–59, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.01.080.
  19. [19] Z. Zhao et al., “Effect of blade and tower interference on wind turbine tower vibration occurred before grid connection,” Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, vol. 76, p. 104290, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2025.104290.
  20. [20] M. Badrul Salleh, N. M. Kamaruddin, and Z. Mohamed-Kassim, “Savonius hydrokinetic turbines for a sustainable river-based energy extraction: A review of the technology and potential applications in Malaysia,” Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, vol. 36, p. 100554, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2019.100554.
  21. [21] E. Fatahian, F. Ismail, M. H. H. Ishak, and W. S. Chang, “Aerodynamic performance improvement of Savonius wind turbine through a passive flow control method using grooved surfaces on a deflector,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 284, p. 115282, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115282.
  22. [22] Muhammad Mizan, Warjito, Budiarso, Ridho Irwansyah, Muhamad Agil Fadhel Kurnianto, and Muhammad Faridz Athaya, “The Performance of the Pico Scale Turgo Water Turbine Coconut Shell Blade with Variations in Nozzle Diameter and Distance,” Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 53–62, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.37934/arfmts.100.1.5362.
  23. [23] R. A. Anugrah, Y. Budiman, A. Widyianto, A. Hadi, H. S. Novanto, and A. Yudianto, “Novel construction of hybrid wind turbine with solar panels: A comprehensive analysis through experimental study and numerical simulation,” Cleaner Energy Systems, vol. 13, p. 100242, Jun. 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.cles.2026.100242.
  24. [24] I. Safdar, S. Sultan, H. A. Raza, M. Umer, and M. Ali, “Empirical analysis of turbine and generator efficiency of a pico hydro system,” Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, vol. 37, p. 100605, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2019.100605.
  25. [25] Kaprawi Sahim et al., “Experimental Study of Darrieus Water Turbine Two Blade Different Configuration and Hybrid Turbine for Application of an Irrigation Flow,” Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 58–66, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.37934/arfmts.98.2.5866.
  26. [26] R. A. Anugrah and S. Muzamil, “Development of Real-Time Data Acquisition Device for Monitoring Torque and RPM of Picohydro-Scale Savonius Water Turbine,” in 2025 5th International Conference on Electronic and Electrical Engineering and Intelligent System (ICE3IS), IEEE, Aug. 2025, pp. 113–118. doi: 10.1109/ICE3IS66769.2025.11280876.
  27. [27] R. A. Anugrah et al., “Experimental Study and Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of Savonius Wind Turbines Using L-shaped Composite Blades for Low-wind Speed,” Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1593–1612, Jul. 2026, doi: 10.47176/jafm.19.7.4141.
  28. [28] R. A. Anugrah, Y. Budiman, and M. H. Bin Peeie, “Performance and durability evaluation of a catamaran-based flood depth detection system using experiments and hydrodynamic simulations,” Journal of Engineering Research, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.jer.2026.04.031.
  29. [29] M. Kulak, M. Lipian, K. Olasek, M. Pereira, and F. Ravelet, “Rotor solidity and blade pitch influence on horizontal axis small wind turbine performance – Experimental study,” Energy Reports, vol. 12, pp. 4568–4577, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2024.10.036.
  30. [30] A. Abdolahifar and A. Zanj, “A review of available solutions for enhancing aerodynamic performance in Darrieus vertical-axis wind turbines: A comparative discussion,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 327, p. 119575, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2025.119575.
  31. [31] M. S. Sakib and D. T. Griffith, “Parked and operating load analysis in the aerodynamic design of multi-megawatt-scale floating vertical-axis wind turbines,” Wind Energy Science, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 677–696, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.5194/wes-7-677-2022.
  32. [32] M. U. Rehman and Z. Ali, “Performance improvement of Savonius hydrokinetic turbine using upstream crescent shape deflector,” Multiscale and Multidisciplinary Modeling, Experiments and Design, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 3, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s41939-024-00598-x.
  33. [33] R. Kumar, A. Kumar, A. K. Shukla, U. M. R. Paturi, and M. Shabeeh, “Impact of Slot Shapes on the Savonius Hydrokinetic Turbine Performance,” in Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, 2026, pp. 155–167. doi: 10.1007/978-981-96-7480-0_12.
  34. [34] T. S. A. Rengma and P. M. V. B. Subbarao, “Water Flow Velocity Driven Modified Savonius Hydrokinetic Turbine,” International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics Research, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 296–303, May 2022, doi: 10.18178/ijmerr.11.5.296-303.
  35. [35] M. El-Sawy, A. S. Shehata, A. . A. Elbatran, and A. Tawfiq, “Numerical simulation of flow in hydrokinetic turbine channel to improve its efficiency by using first and second-law efficiency analysis,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 244, p. 110400, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.110400.
  36. [36] R. Patel and V. Patel, “Performance analysis of Savonius hydrokinetic turbine using ‘C’ shaped Deflector,” Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 6618–6631, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1080/15567036.2022.2101718.
  37. [37] M. R. Ahmed, M. Faizal, and Y.-H. Lee, “Optimization of blade curvature and inter-rotor spacing of Savonius rotors for maximum wave energy extraction,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 65, pp. 32–38, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.02.005.
  38. [38] Z. A. Memon, A. A. Sahito, Z. H. Leghari, P. H. Shaikh, and P. H. Shaikh, “Output Voltage Characteristics of Wind Energy System Considering Wind Speed and Number of Blades,” 2016.
  39. [39] A. Eltayesh et al., “Experimental and numerical investigation of the effect of blade number on the aerodynamic performance of a small-scale horizontal axis wind turbine,” Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 3931–3944, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2021.02.048.
  40. [40] A. Sajedin, J. Allport, M. Amoozgar, and O. F. Marandi, “Blade thickness effects on viscous flutter in a radial turbocharger turbine,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 136, p. 106139, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106139.
  41. [41] E. Y. Assefa and A. H. Tesfay, “Synergetic Improvement of Blade Entry and Water Admission Angles for High Efficiency Cross-Flow Turbines in Micro-Hydropower Applications,” Energies, vol. 18, no. 17, p. 4540, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.3390/en18174540.
  42. [42] Z. Li, Y. Yuan, B. Guo, V. L. Varsegov, and J. Yao, “The Recirculation Zone Characteristics of the Circular Transverse Jet in Crossflow,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 12, p. 3224, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.3390/en13123224.
  43. [43] Thoharudin, T. Santosa, H. Irawan, and H. Waloyo, “Investigation of Blade Number Effect on the Centrifugal Blower as a Small-Scale Water Turbine,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 2989, no. 1, p. 012008, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2989/1/012008.
  44. [44] X. Li et al., “Aeroelastic instability of ultra-long flexible blades in floating offshore wind turbines: A state-of-the-art review,” Advances in Wind Engineering, vol. 3, no. 3, p. 100123, Sep. 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.awe.2026.100123.
  45. [45] J. Huo, W. Zhang, J. Zhang, and L. Wang, “Flow dynamics characteristics of cleaning aircraft engine compressor blades using air-water mist flow,” AIP Advances, vol. 15, no. 12, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1063/5.0300955.
  46. [46] G. R. H. Abo Elyamin, M. A. Bassily, K. Y. Khalil, and M. S. Gomaa, “Effect of impeller blades number on the performance of a centrifugal pump,” Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 39–48, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2019.02.004.
  47. [47] Zamzami, A. Akhyar, S. E. Sofyan, Suriadi, and Khairil, “A review of vortex water turbine design for sustainable energy generation (principles, optimization, and validation),” Energy Conversion and Management: X, vol. 26, p. 100895, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.100895.
Article Metrics
84
Views
0
Downloads

SCITE

DIMENSIONS

Publication Information
Published July 22, 2026
Section Articles
Copyright Copyright (c) 2026 Rinasa Agistya Anugrah, Sudarja, Yosef Budiman, Muhammad Yusri Ilyas
License Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Keywords
  • CFD simulation
  • Deflector angle
  • Pico-hydro turbine
  • Savonius blade
  • Water flow