Mechanical Engineering for Society and Industry

Articles

Emphasis of Weld Time, Shielding Gas and Oxygen Content in Activated Fluxes on the Weldment Microstructure

Surinder Tathgir , Dinesh W Rathod , Ajay Batish

Abstract

The activated-TIG (A-TIG) process is a recognised process for achieving higher depth-of- penetration (DoP) and it could be used for various stainless-steel grades welding. The oxygen content of oxide based activated fluxes provide the extra heat during decomposition of flux and result into deep penetration. This study reveals the effect of short weld time of 2 sec in stationary arc, shielding environment (Ar and Ar + 2.5 % H2) and an effect of oxygen element in activated flux (CrO3 and SiO2) on the microstructure and weld metal micro-hardness. Use of hydrogen mix shielding gas during A-TIG process has significant impact on the dilution rate, grain size and dendrite arm spacing. The fraction of oxygen in the flux and the presence of silicon in SiO2 flux play a significant role in achieving higher DoP. To evaluate the impact of different shielding environment on grain growth, the samples were investigated with weld pool morphology, depth of penetration, weld chemistry, optical microscopy and SEM analysis. The extra heat produced due to oxygen fraction in activated flux and H2 induced shielding have been quantified in the study. The ferrite and austenite grain growth as well as the dendrite arm spacing found to be increased due to presence of H2 in shielding gas.

Keywords

Short weld time; Reverse marangoni; Hydrogen; Grain growth; Dendrite arm; Electron attachment; Oxygen rich elements

References

  1. [1] J. Rosado-Carrasco, U. Krupp, V. H. López-Morelos, A. Giertler, M. A. García-Rentería, and J. González-Sánchez, “Effect of a magnetic field applied during fusion welding on the fatigue damage of 2205 duplex stainless steel joints,” International Journal of Fatigue, vol. 121, no. July 2018, pp. 243–251, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.12.022.
  2. [2] T. S. Chern, K. H. Tseng, and H. L. Tsai, “Study of the characteristics of duplex stainless steel activated tungsten inert gas welds,” Materials and Design, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 255–263, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.05.056.
  3. [3] Z. M. Liu et al., “Stable keyhole welding process with K-TIG,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 238, pp. 65–72, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.07.005.
  4. [4] Y. Shi, S. Cui, T. Zhu, S. Gu, and X. Shen, “Microstructure and intergranular corrosion behavior of HAZ in DP-TIG welded DSS joints,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 256, no. November 2017, pp. 254–261, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.02.019.
  5. [5] D. Rathod, S. Aravindan, P. K. Singh, and S. Pandey, “Metallurgical characterization and diffusion studies of successively buttered deposit of Ni-fe alloy and inconel on SA508 ferritic steel,” ISIJ International, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 1866–1875, 2014, doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.54.1866.
  6. [6] E. Folkhard, Welding Metallurgy of Stainless Steels. New York: Springer-Verlag/Wien, 1988.
  7. [7] A. Bhattacharya, “Revisiting arc, metal flow behavior in flux activated tungsten inert gas welding,” Materials and Manufacturing Processes, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 343–351, 2016, doi: 10.1080/10426914.2015.1070421.
  8. [8] S. Tathgir, A. Bhattacharya, and T. K. Bera, “Influence of Current and Shielding Gas in TiO2 flux Activated Tig Welding on Different Graded Steels,” Materials and Manufacturing Processes, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1115–1123, 2015, doi: 10.1080/10426914.2014.973591.
  9. [9] S. Tathgir and A. Bhattacharya, “Activated-TIG welding of different steels: Influence of various flux and shielding gas,” Materials and Manufacturing Processes, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 335–342, 2016, doi: 10.1080/10426914.2015.1037914.
  10. [10] S. Tathgir, D. W. Rathod, and A. Batish, “A-TIG welding process for enhanced-penetration in Duplex stainless-steel: effect of activated fluxes,” Materials and Manufacturing Processes, vol. 34, no. 15, pp. 1659–1670, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1080/10426914.2019.1666990.
  11. [11] A. Kulkarni, D. K. Dwivedi, and M. Vasudevan, “Effect of oxide fluxes on activated TIG welding of AISI 316L austenitic stainless steel,” in Materials Today: Proceedings, 2019, vol. 18, pp. 4695–4702, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.07.455.
  12. [12] S. Tathgir, D. W. Rathod, and A. Batish, “Process enhancement using hydrogen-induced shielding: H2-induced A-TIG welding process,” Materials and Manufacturing Processes, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 1084–1095, 2020.
  13. [13] S. Lu, H. Fujii, and K. Nogi, “Weld shape variation and electrode oxidation behavior under Ar-(Ar-CO2) double shielded GTA welding,” Journal of Materials Science and Technology, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 170–176, 2010, doi: 10.1016/S1005-0302(10)60028-X.
  14. [14] S. Tathgir and A. Bhattacharya, “Activated-TIG welding of different steels: Influence of various flux and shielding gas,” Materials and Manufacturing Processes, vol. 31, no. 3, 2016, doi: 10.1080/10426914.2015.1037914.
  15. [15] J. J. Lowke, M. Tanaka, and M. Ushio, “Mechanisms giving increased weld depth due to a flux,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 38, no. 18, pp. 3438–3445, 2005, doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/38/18/018.
  16. [16] M. Suban, J. Tušek, and M. Uran, “Use of hydrogen in welding engineering in former times and today,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 119, no. 1–3, pp. 193–198, 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00956-6.
  17. [17] D. W. Rathod, S. Pandey, S. Aravindan, and P. K. Singh, “Diffusion Control and Metallurgical Behavior of Successive Buttering on SA508 Steel Using Ni–Fe Alloy and Inconel 182,” Metallography, Microstructure, and Analysis, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 450–460, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s13632-016-0311-z.
  18. [18] K. H. Tseng and P. Y. Chen, “Effect of TiO2 crystalline phase on performance of flux assisted GTA welds,” Materials and Manufacturing Processes, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 359–365, 2016, doi: 10.1080/10426914.2015.1058952.
  19. [19] E. Ahmadi and A. R. Ebrahimi, “Welding of 316L Austenitic Stainless Steel with Activated Tungsten Inert Gas Process,” Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 1065–1071, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s11665-014-1336-6.
  20. [20] J. J. Vora and V. J. Badheka, “Experimental investigation on mechanism and weld morphology of activated TIG welded bead-on-plate weldments of reduced activation ferritic/martensitic steel using oxide fluxes,” Journal of Manufacturing Processes, vol. 20, pp. 224–233, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2015.07.006.
  21. [21] Y. L. Xu, Z. B. Dong, Y. H. Wei, and C. L. Yang, “Marangoni convection and weld shape variation in A-TIG welding process,” Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 178–186, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2007.05.004.
  22. [22] K.-H. Tseng and K.-L. Chen, “Comparisons between TiO2-and SiO2- Flux Assisted TIG Welding Processes.,” Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 6359–6367, 2012, doi: 10.1166/jnn.2012.6419.
  23. [23] S. Kou, Welding Metallurgy, Second. New Jersey: A John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Publication, 2003.
  24. [24] R. Blondeau, Metallurgy and Mechanics of Welding: Processes and Industrial Applications. New Jersey: A John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Publication, 2010.
  25. [25] T. Zacharia, S. A. David, J. M. Vitek, and T. Debroy, “Weld Pool Development during GTA and Laser Beam Welding of Type 304 Stainless Steel , Part I — Theoretical Analysis,” Weld. J. Res. Suppl., vol. 68, no. 12, p. 499s To 509s, 1989.
  26. [26] T. Zacharia, S. A. David, J. M. Vitek, and T. Debroy, “Weld Pool Development during GTA and Laser Beam Welding of Type 304 Stainless Steel , Part II — Experimental Correlation,” Weld. J. Res. Suppl., vol. 68, no. 12, pp. 510s-520s, 1989.