Jurnal Tarbiyatuna

Articles

Fazlur Rahman's Thoughts of Double Movement in the Context of the Development of Unity of Sciences

Nasitotul Janah , Irham Nugroho

Published
Juni 30, 2022

Vol 13 No 1 (2022)
Pages 63-81

DOI

Open Access
Share

Abstrak

The paradigms of rationalism, empiricism and positivism as the basis for the development of Western science adopted by the Islamic world have led to the emergence of a dichotomy and dualism that puts science and religion a vis a. The implication is that science becomes value-less, wild, secular and sometimes destructive. Science and religion are two independent entities, do not interfere with each other and are in different zones, even their relationship is sometimes colored by conflict that negates each other. To find a solution to this situation, ideas and concepts for the integration of science and religion, such as de-westernization and Islamization of knowledge, emerged from Islamic thinkers as an effort to build a more harmonious, conducive, and constructive relationship between science and religion. However, this idea received resistance from Fazlurrahman because according to him science is objective so that Islamization or dewesternization is not needed, but rather integration or unity of science. This research is a library research. Sources of data were obtained through various written works, both in the form of books and journals, to find out how relevant Fazlurrahman's thoughts are in the context of developing unity of science in the Islamic world. The results of this study offer the concept of returning knowledge to its natural state by placing Allah as the main source of knowledge in the context of the ontological dimension; making the universe (kauniyyah verse) and sacred texts of the holy book (qauliyyah verse) a source of knowledge in the context of the epistemological dimension; in its application and implementation, science must have a moral responsibility to humanistic values ”‹”‹in the context of the axiological dimension.

Keywords

Unity of Science; Ontological; Epistemological; Axiology

Referensi

  1. Abdullah, M. A. (1995). Falsafah kalam di era postmodernisme.
  2. Abdullah, M. A., & Abdullah, M. A. (2007). Islamic studies dalam paradigma integrasi interkoneksi: sebuah antologi. Suka Press.
  3. Amal, T. A. (1989). Islam dan tantangan modernitas: studi atas pemikiran hukum Fazlur Rahman (Vol. 11). Mizan.
  4. Amigue, F. F., Essiane, S. N., Ngoffe, S. P., Ondoa, G. A., Mengounou, G. M., & Nna Nna, P. T. (2021). Optimal integration of photovoltaic power into the electricity network using Slime mould algorithms: Application to the interconnected grid in North Cameroon. Energy Reports, 7, 6292–6307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.09.077
  5. Badar, M. Z. (2020). Konsep Integrasi antara Islam dan Ilmu Telaah Pemikiran Kuntowijoyo. An-Nas, 4(1), 45–58.
  6. Bechtel, W., & Hamilton, A. (2007). Reduction, Integration, and the Unity of Science. General Philosophy of Science, 377–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-044451548-3/50009-4
  7. Brisson, T. (2015). Western and Non-Western Views of the Social and Behavioral Sciences: De-Westernizing the Social and Behavioral Sciences. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition (Second Edi, Vol. 25). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.03201-3
  8. Dennerlein, B., & Hamid, A. (2010). Reconfiguring Islamic Tradition: Reform, Rationality, and Modernity. Religion, 40(4), 341–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.religion.2010.06.001
  9. Fathonah, P. (2019). Thoughts of Fazlur Rahman Education and Its Contribution to The Development of Islamic Education Theory. DINIKA : Academic Journal of Islamic Studies, 3(3), 359. https://doi.org/10.22515/dinika.v3i3.1287
  10. Fauzi, A. (2017). Integrasi dan Islamisasi Ilmu Dalam Perspektif Pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 8(1), 1–18.
  11. Fazlurrahman, M. (2018). Modernisasi Pendidikan Islam: Gagasan Alternatif Fazlur Rahman. TA’LIM: Jurnal Studi Pendidikan Islam, 1(1), 73–89.
  12. Fitria, V., & Al Giffari, H. A. (2021). The language of science and religion: An approach to understand the encounter between science and religion according to Ian G. Barbour. Humanika, Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum, 21(1), 55–68.
  13. Hanifah, U. (2018). Islamisasi Ilmu Pengetahuan Kontemporer (Konsep Integrasi Keilmuan di Universitas-Universitas Islam Indonesia. TADRIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 13(2), 273–294.
  14. Izudin, A. (2015). Paradigma Integrasi-Interkoneksi: Analisis Epistemologi Pemikiran Keislaman M. Amin Abdullah. Islamic Review: Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Keislaman, IV, 1.
  15. Kuntowijoyo. (2004). Islam sebagai ilmu: epistemologi, metodologi, dan etika. Teraju.
  16. Kuntowijoyo, I. S. I. (2006). Epistemologi. Metodologi dan Etika, Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
  17. Mahzar, A., & Dj, A. S. (2004). Revolusi integralisme Islam: merumuskan paradigma sains dan teknologi Islam. Mizan.
  18. Muhaimin, H. (1999). Kontroversi pemikiran Fazlur Rahman: studi kritis pembaharuan pendidikan Islam. Pustaka Dinamika.
  19. Mustaqim, A. (2010). Epistemologi tafsir kontemporer.
  20. Nugroho, I. (2016). Positivisme Auguste Comte: Analisa Epistemologis dan Nilai Etisnya Terhadap Sains. Cakrawala: Jurnal Studi Islam, 11(2), 167–177.
  21. Purwaningsih, Y. (2010). De-westernisasi dan Islamisasi Pendidikan perspektif Syed Naquib al-Attas. IAIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya.
  22. Rahman, F. (2009). Major Themes of the Qur’an. University of Chicago Press.
  23. Rahman, F. (2020). Islam. University of Chicago Press.
  24. Rahman, F. (2021). Revival and reform in Islam: A study of Islamic fundamentalism. Simon and Schuster.
  25. Rahman, K. (2017). Konsep Pendidikan Islam Modern dalam Perspektif Kiai Pesantren. LISAN AL-HAL: Jurnal Pengembangan Pemikiran dan Kebudayaan, 11(2), 209–236.
  26. Reisch, G. A. (1997). How postmodern was Neurath’s idea of unity of science? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 28(3), 439–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-3681(96)00027-1
  27. Ridwan, I. M. (2020). Harmoni, Disharmoni, dan Integrasi Antara Sains dan Agama. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 3(1), 8–13.
  28. Rosa, A., Kurniawan, A. F., Pelaksana, R., Ahmad, L. T., Syukron, T., & No, J. J. S. (2015). Redaktur Ahli (Mitra Bestari): Utang Ranuwijaya (IAIN “SMH†Banten) Ja’far Assagaf (IAIN Surakarta) Muhajirin (UIN Raden Fatah Palembang) Penanggungjawab: Udi Mufradi Mawardi.
  29. Sifa, A. N. A., & Adha, A. F. (2019). Understanding the Hermeneutic Debate as a New Method of Understanding Hadis. Journal of Hadith Studies, 2(1), 54–72.
  30. Siregar, A. B. A. (2015). Islamisasi Ilmu Pengetahuan. Jurnal Fikrah, 6, 91–100.
  31. Sumantri, R. A. (2013). Hermeneutika Al-Quran Fazlur Rahman Metode Tafsir Double Movement. Komunika: Jurnal Dakwah dan Komunikasi, 7(1).
  32. Supena, I. (2008). Desain Ilmu-ilmu Keislaman dalam Pemikiran Hermeneutika Fazlur Rahman. Semarang: Walisongo Press.
  33. Taufik, M., & Yasir, M. (2017). Mengkritisi Konsep Islamisasi Ilmu Ismail Raji al-Faruqi: Telaah Pemikiran Ziauddin Sardar. Jurnal Ushuluddin, 25(2), 109–123.
  34. Tharaba, M. F. (2019). Kajian Pemikiran Integrasi Keilmuan Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang melalui Ulul Albab.
  35. Wahyuni, F. (2018). Islamisasi Ilmu Pengetahuan (Upaya Mengurai Dikotomi Ilmu Pengetahuan dalam Islam). QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Agama, 10(02).
  36. Wijaya, A. (2014). Satu Islam, Ragam Epistemologi. IRCISOD.
  37. Yaqin, M. A., Astuti, E. W., Anggraini, C. E. A., & Hidayatullah, A. F. (2020). Integrasi Ayat-Ayat Al-Qur’an dalam Pembelajaran Sains (Biologi) Berdasarkan Pemikiran Ian G. Barbour. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Sains, 6(1), 78–83.
Article Metrics
34
Views
23
Downloads

SCITE

DIMENSIONS

Publication Information
Published Juni 30, 2022
Section Articles
Copyright Hak Cipta (c) 2022 nasitotul janah, Irham Nugroho
Keywords
  • Unity of Science
  • Ontological
  • Epistemological
  • Axiology

Artikel paling banyak dibaca berdasarkan penulis yang sama