Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 869 Download : 434

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The aerodynamic benefits of a vehicle in a platoon could be distracted by an imposed crosswind on it. The study aims to investigate the alteration of aerodynamic coefficient comprising drag force coefficient, lift force coefficient, side force coefficient, and pressure coefficient of buses traveling in a platoon by considering crosswind. A Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) simulation was carried out on a detailed bus model. Proposed meshing techniques were also offered. The investigation considered the yaw angle from  0° to 30° and inter-bus distances by proposed coefficient X/L from 0.05 to 1.25. The results in the changes in the aerodynamic performance of both buses were presented. The advantages of platoon configuration were described in more detail when no crosswind was considered in terms of the generated turbulence kinetic energy of the leading and following bus. The results indicated that a crosswind deteriorates aerodynamic benefits during the platoon. The inter-bus distance determines how the airflow around the bus behaves, leading to the variation in aerodynamic advantages experienced by buses. Comparison between the numerical study and experiment indicated a satisfactory correlation of results validation.

Keywords

Aerodynamics Bus CFD Convoy Crosswind Platoon Yaw angle

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

  1. A. Davila, E. Del Pozo, E. Aramburu, and A. Freixas, “Environmental benefits of vehicle platooning,” in SAE Technical Papers, 2013, doi: 10.4271/2013-26-0142.
  2. A. Davila and M. Nombela, “Platooning-safe and eco-friendly mobility,” in SAE Technical Papers, 2012, doi: 10.4271/2012-01-0488.
  3. J. Törnell, S. Sebben, and D. Söderblom, “Influence of Inter-Vehicle Distance on the Aerodynamics of a Two-Truck Platoon,” International Journal of Automotive Technology, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s12239-021-0068-5.
  4. S. T. Kaluva, A. Pathak, and A. Ongel, “Aerodynamic drag analysis of autonomous electric vehicle platoons,” Energies, 2020, doi: 10.3390/en13154028.
  5. C. H. Bruneau, K. Khadra, and I. Mortazavi, “Flow analysis of square-back simplified vehicles in platoon,” International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2017.05.008.
  6. B. R. McAuliffe and M. Ahmadi-Baloutaki, “A Wind-Tunnel Investigation of the Influence of Separation Distance, Lateral Stagger, and Trailer Configuration on the Drag-Reduction Potential of a Two-Truck Platoon,” SAE International Journal of Commercial Vehicles, 2018, doi: 10.4271/02-11-02-0011.
  7. Q. Li, W. Dai, Z. Yang, and Q. Jia, “Investigation on aerodynamic characteristics of tailing vehicle hood in a two-vehicle platoon,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, 2020, doi: 10.1177/0954407019857430.
  8. G. Le Good, M. Resnick, P. Boardman, and B. Clough, “An investigation of aerodynamic effects of body morphing for passenger cars in close-proximity,” Fluids, 2021, doi: 10.3390/fluids6020064.
  9. B. Q. He, Y. Z. Wu, and L. M. Fu, “Influence of vehicle shape on the aerodynamic characteristics of intelligent vehicle platoon,” Jilin Daxue Xuebao (Gongxueban)/Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2008.
  10. F. Jaffar, T. Farid, M. Sajid, Y. Ayaz, and M. J. Khan, “Prediction of Drag Force on Vehicles in a Platoon Configuration Using Machine Learning,” IEEE Access, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3035318.
  11. H. Sun, E. Karadimitriou, X. M. Li, and D. Mathioulakis, “Aerodynamic Interference between Two Road Vehicle Models during Overtaking,” Journal of Energy Engineering, 2019, doi: 10.1061/(asce)ey.1943-7897.0000601.
  12. E. Deng et al., “Aerodynamic response of high-speed trains under crosswind in a bridge-tunnel section with or without a wind barrier,” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104502.
  13. T. Li, D. Qin, and J. Zhang, “Effect of RANS Turbulence Model on Aerodynamic Behavior of Trains in Crosswind,” Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering (English Edition), 2019, doi: 10.1186/s10033-019-0402-2.
  14. Z. Guo et al., “Numerical study for the aerodynamic performance of double unit train under crosswind,” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2019.06.014.
  15. J. Niu, D. Zhou, and X. Liang, “Numerical investigation of the aerodynamic characteristics of high-speed trains of different lengths under crosswind with or without windbreaks,” Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 2018, doi: 10.1080/19942060.2017.1390786.
  16. F. Chen, H. Peng, X. Ma, J. Liang, W. Hao, and X. Pan, “Examining the safety of trucks under crosswind at bridge-tunnel section: A driving simulator study,” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2019.103034.
  17. F. Chen, H. Peng, X. Ma, J. Liang, and X. Pan, “Model of Driving Behavior of Truck Driver Under Crosswind,” Tongji Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Tongji University, 2020, doi: 10.11908/j.issn.0253-374x.19325.
  18. X. J. Hu, P. Y. Ding, P. Qin, P. Guo, W. Bin Luo, and B. Yang, “Numerical simulation on aerodynamic characteristics of heavy-duty truck driving on bridge within crosswind,” Jilin Daxue Xuebao (Gongxueban)/Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2012.
  19. X. J. Hu, P. Qin, L. Liao, P. Guo, J. Y. Wang, and B. Yang, “Numerical simulation of the aerodynamic characteristics of heavy-duty trucks through viaduct in crosswind,” Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2014, doi: 10.1016/S1001-6058(14)60044-5.
  20. I. A. Ishak, M. S. Mat Ali, M. F. Mohd Yakub, and S. A. Z. Shaikh Salim, “Effect of crosswinds on aerodynamic characteristics around a generic train model,” International Journal of Rail Transportation, 2019, doi: 10.1080/23248378.2018.1424573.
  21. I. A. Ishak et al., “Aerodynamic characteristics around a generic train moving on different embankments under the influence of crosswind,” Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, 2019.
  22. H. Li, X. He, H. Wang, S. Peng, S. Zhou, and L. Hu, “Aerodynamics of a two-dimensional bluff body with the cross-section of a train,” Advances in Structural Engineering, 2020, doi: 10.1177/1369433220921002.
  23. H. Zhu and Y. Zhigang, “Fluid-structure interaction study of three-dimensional vehicle model under crosswind,” Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2015, doi: 10.1177/1687814015591318.
  24. G. M. Le Good and K. P. Garry, “On the use of reference models in automotive aerodynamics,” in SAE Technical Papers, 2004, doi: 10.4271/2004-01-1308.
  25. A. Yudianto, H. A. Susanto, A. Suyanto, I. W. Adiyasa, A. Yudantoko, and N. A. Fauzi, “Aerodynamic performance analysis of open-wheel vehicle: Investigation of wings installation under different speeds,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1700/1/012086.
  26. J. D. Kee, J. H. Rho, K. H. Kim, and D. H. Lee, “High speed driving stability of passenger car under crosswind effects,” International Journal of Automotive Technology, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s12239-014-0077-8.
  27. S. Zou, X. He, and H. Wang, “Numerical investigation on the crosswind effects on a train running on a bridge,” Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 2020, doi: 10.1080/19942060.2020.1832920.
  28. T. Tunay, E. Firat, and B. Sahin, “Experimental investigation of the flow around a simplified ground vehicle under effects of the steady crosswind,” International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2018.03.020.
  29. L. Liu, Y. Sun, X. Chi, G. Du, and M. Wang, “Transient aerodynamic characteristics of vans overtaking in crosswinds,” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2017.07.014.
  30. B. Duncan, L. D’Alessio, J. Gargoloff, and A. Alajbegovic, “Vehicle aerodynamics impact of on-road turbulence,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, 2017, doi: 10.1177/0954407017699710.
  31. W. Meile, G. Brenn, A. Reppenhagen, B. Lechner, and A. Fuchs, “Experiments and numerical simulations on the aerodynamics of the ahmed body,” CFD Letters, 2011.
  32. S. R. Ahmed, G. Ramm, and G. Faltin, “Some salient features of the time-averaged ground vehicle wake,” in SAE Technical Papers, 1984, doi: 10.4271/840300.
  33. D. W. Karmiadji, M. Gozali, M. Setiyo, T. Raja, and T. A. Purnomo, “Comprehensive Analysis of Minibuses Gravity Center: A Post-Production Review for Car Body Industry,” Mechanical Engineering for Society and Industry, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 31–40, 2021