Main Article Content

Abstract

Jladri Shrimp Farm is a shrimp farm that has promising economic prospects, especially as Indonesia's leading export commodity. This pond faces various challenges from technical, economic and environmental aspects that can affect its sustainability. This study aims to analyze the feasibility of Vaname shrimp farming in Jladri Shrimp Pond based on these three aspects in order to provide recommendations for sustainable business development. The results showed that technically, this farm has an average Survival Rate (SR) value above 70%, which indicates a good Survival Rate of shrimp, as well as Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) values ranging from 0.85 to 1.1, which indicates optimal feed efficiency. From an economic point to view, significant results were obtained as evidenced by the Payback Period of 1 year 6 months 14 days, a positive Net Present Value (NPV) of Rp 7,516,119,200, a Profitability Index (PI) of 7.54, and an Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of 111%. However, the environmental assessment showed that carbon emissions from electricity and fuel consumption exceeded the standards set, indicating the need for increased energy efficiency and the use of renewable energy to reduce environmental impacts and improve the sustainability of shrimp farming.

Keywords

Business feasibility; Vaname shrimp farming; technical aspects; economic aspects; environmental aspects

Article Details

References

  1. Alawadhi, G., Almehiri, M., Sakhrieh, A., Alshwawra, A., & Al Asfar, J. (2023). Cost Analysis of Implementing In-Pipe Hydro Turbine in the United Arab Emirates Water Network. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010651.
  2. Bahri, S., Mardhia, D., & Saputra, O. (2020). Growth and Graduation of Vannamei Shell Life (Litopenaeus Vannamei) with Feeding Tray (ANCO) System in AV 8 Lim Shrimp Organization (LSO) in Sumbawa District. Jurnal Biologi Tropis, 20(2), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.29303/jbt.v20i2.1812.
  3. Cahyanurani, A. B., & Edy, M. H. (2022). Performance of intensive vannamei (Litopenaeus vannamei) culture at low salinity. Depik, 11(3), 257–264. https://doi.org/10.13170/depik.11.3.25565
  4. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2015). Technology-specific Cost and Performance Parameters. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change, 1329–1356. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107415416.025.
  5. Ismail, Y. (2020). Analisis Kelayakan Usaha Tambak Udang Vannamei di Desa Patuhu Kecamatan Randangan Kabupaten Pohuwato. Perbal: Jurnal Pertanian Berkelanjutan, 8(2), 67–76. https://journal.uncp.ac.id/index.php/perbal/article/view/1536.
  6. Kasmir, S.E., M.M. dan jakfar, S.E., M. M. (2003). Studi Kelayakan Bisnis: Edisi Revisi. In StudiKelayakanBisnis:EdisiRevisi.https://books.google.co.id/books?id=oQRBDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA39&hl=id&sou%20rce=gbs_selected_pages&cad=1#v=onepage&q&f=false.
  7. Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral. (2019). Faktor Emisi Grk Sistem Ketenagalistrikan tahun 2019.
  8. https://gatrik.esdm.go.id/assets/uploads/download_index/files/96d7c-nilai-fe-grk-sistem-ketenagalistrikan-tahun-2019.pdf.
  9. Mustajab, R. (2023). Data Ekspor Udang Indonesia. https://dataindonesia.id/industri-perdagangan/detail/data-ekspor-udang-indonesia-20122022.
  10. Permatasari, M. N., & Ariadi, H. (2021). Studi Analisis Kelayakan Finansial Usaha Budidaya Udang Vaname (L. vannamei) di Tambak Pesisir Kota Pekalongan. AKULTURASI Jurnal Ilmiah Agrobisnis Perikanan, 9(2), 284–290. http://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/akulturasi.
  11. PLN. (2022). Kendaraan Listrik Mampu Kurangi Emisi Karbon Hingga Separuh, PLN Terus Dorong dan Kembangkan Ekosistemnya. https://web.pln.co.id/media/2022/10/kendaraan-listrik-mampu-kurangi-emisi-%20karbon-hingga-separuh-pln-terus-dorong-dan-kembangkan %20ekosistemnya#:~:text=Sedangkan%201%20kWh%20listrik%20pada,sekitar%201%2C1%20kg%20CO2e.
  12. Rizky, P. N., Cahyanurani, A. B., & Fahruddin, F. (2022). Aspek Teknis (Kontruksi) Tambak terhadap Produktivitas Budidaya Udang Vanname (Litopenaeus vannamei) secara Intensif di PT. Andulang Shrimp Farm, Sumenep, Jawa Timur. Grouper, 13(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.30736/grouper.v13i1.104.
  13. Sahabudin, S., Muhsin, M., Ketut Karno, K. K., Zakiyah, A., Anggara, A., Irsyam, I., & Drajat, S. R. (2020). Budidaya Udang Vannamei (Litopenaeus vannamei) Sistem Bioflok di Kolam Terpal Bundar pada Kelompok Masyarakat Perikanan Binaan PT. Pertamina (Persero) Fuel Terminal Parepare. Insan Cita : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.32662/insancita.v2i2.1143.
  14. Sugiyanto, Nadi, L., & Wenten, I. K. (2020). Studi kelayakan bisnis teknik untuk mengetahui bisnis dapat dijalankan atau tidak. In YPSIM Banten (Vol. 1). http://eprints.unpam.ac.id/8654/3/Buku SKB Sugiyanto-Terbit 2020 Gabung-E- book.pdf.
  15. Wiranto Gompi, Hariyani Sambali, Ockstan J. Kalesaran, E. L. A. N., & Joppy D. Mudeng, W. M. M. (2023). Studi kasus rasio konversi pakan (FCR) di tambak intensif udang vanname (Litopenaeus vannamei) CV. Sinar Limunga. AT- TAWASSUTH: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, VIII(I), 1–19.