Article Sidebar

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 790 Download : 676

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Islamic education has been dogmatic because it emphasizes a behavioral approach, where the environment shapes the students' character. This contradicts neuroscience, where students have the potential to change their environment. Therefore, this literature study aimed to analyze character education as brain education from a neuroscience perspective using a qualitative approach. Data were then obtained manually and digitally from books and journals on neuroscience and Islamic education on the Sinta database and analyzed using content analysis. The results showed that character education using a behavioral approach does not produce students with good habits in the community. In contrast, the neuroscience approach allows them to develop a permanent good character identity with a transformative impact on the environment. These findings challenge a new direction of studies on Islamic education using a neuroscience approach with implications for shifting learning theory and practice.

Keywords

Islamic Education Character Neuroscience Behavioral

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Abduh, M. (2014). Interaksi Pada Pendekatan Saintifik (Kajian Teori Scaffolding) In addition to cognitive and metacognitive challenges, these practices include a social dimension, as investigations involve working together in teams, planning, and negotiat. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan PGSD UMS & HDPGSDI Wilayah Jawa, 307–318.
  2. Asfar, A. M. irfan T. A. & andi muhammad iqbal. (2019). Teori Behaviorisme (Theory of Behaviorism). Researchgate, (February), 0–32. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.34507.44324
  3. Budiyanto, K., Waluyo, L., & Mokhtar, A. (2016). Implementasi Pendekatan Saintifik dalam Pembelajaran di Pendidikan Dasar di Malang. Proceeding Biology Education Conference, 13(1), 46–51.
  4. Hanafi, I. (2016). Neurosains-spiritualitas dan pengembangan potensi kreatif. An-Nuha, 3(1), 23–38.
  5. Harahap, Z. M. R., & Suyadir. (2020). Pengembangan pendidikan karakter melalui pendekatan behaviorisme berbasis neurosains di sd muhammadiyah purbayan. Psikoislamedia Jurnal Psikologi, 05, 38–53.
  6. Jailani, M., Suyadi, & Djabedi, D. (2021). Menelusuri Jejak Otak dan ’Aql dalam Al-Qur’an Perspektif Neurosains dan Pendidikan Islam di Era Pandemi COVID-19. Tadris: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 16(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.19105/tjpi.v16i1.4347
  7. Muhimmah, I., & Suyadi, S. (2020). Neurosains dan Spiritualitas dalam Pendidikan Islam. TADRIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 15(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.19105/tjpi.v15i1.2880
  8. Nulfita, I. M. (2014). Implementasi Pendekatan Saintifik dan Karakter dalam Pembelajaran Sains Menyongsong Generasi Emas Indonesia. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains (SNPS), 1–7.
  9. Nur Hakim, M., & Rahayu, F. D. (2019). Pembelajaran Saintifik Berbasis Pengembangan Karakter. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 2(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v2i1.148
  10. Omeri, N. (2015). Pentingnya Pendidikan Karakter Dalam Dunia Pendidikan. Nopan Omeri, 9(manager pendidikan), 464–468.
  11. Perdana, N. S. (2018). Implementasi Peranan Ekosistem Pendidikan Dalam Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter Peserta Didik. Refleksi Edukatika : Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.24176/re.v8i2.2358
  12. Pratama, Y. A. (2019). Relevansi Teori Belajar Behaviorisme Terhadap Pendidikan Agama Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Al-Thariqah, 4(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.25299/al-thariqah.2019.vol4(1).2718
  13. Raharjo, Hermawan, P. (2015). Penerapan Pendekatan Saintifik Dalam Membentuk Karakter Positf Anak. Journal of Physical Education Health and Sport, 2(1), 28–31. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpehs.v2i1.3939
  14. Rizal, M. (2020). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dengan Multi Representasi terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Penguasaan Konsep IPA. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(1), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i1.614
  15. Rufaedah, E. A. (2017). Teori Belajar Behavioristik Menurut Perspektif Islam. RisâLah, Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Studi Islam, 4(1), 14–30. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3550518
  16. Saifurrahman, S. (2019). Desain Pembelajaran Keagamaan Islam Berbasis Neurosains. AL-MURABBI: Jurnal Studi Kependidikan Dan Keislaman, 6(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.53627/jam.v6i1.3634
  17. Setiawan, D. (2017). Pendekatan Saintifik Dan Penilaian Autentik Untuk Meningkatkan Mutu Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam. AL-ASASIYYA: Journal Of Basic Education, 1(2), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.24269/ajbe.v1i2.683
  18. Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  19. Sukmayadi, S. S. W. (2020). Reading Corner Anti-corruption Literacy in Kindergarten ’Aisyiyah Bustanul Athfal (TK ABA) Perak Mosque Complex, Anti-corruption Village, Prenggan Village, Kotagede Yogyakarta. Jurnal Tarbiyatuna, 11(2), 114–127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31603/tarbiyatuna.v11i2.3422 Article
  20. Suliswiyadi, S. (2020). Hierarki Ranah Pembelajaran Afektif Pendidikan Agama Islam dalam Perspektif Taksonomi Qur’ani. Jurnal Tarbiyatuna, 11(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.31603/tarbiyatuna.v11i1.3451
  21. Suyadi. (2013). Strategi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Karakter. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  22. Suyadi. (2016). Teori Pembelajaran Anak usia Dini Dalam Kajian Neurosains. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  23. Suyadi. (2018a). Pendidikan Islam Anak Usia Dini Dalam Perspektif Neurosains: Robotik Akademik Dan Saintifik. Edukasia: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Islam, 13(2), 231–262. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/edukasia.v13i2.3255
  24. Suyadi. (2018b). The Synergy of Arts, Neuroscience, and Islamic In Early Childhood Learning In Yogyakarta. Tarbiya: Journal of Education in Muslim Society, 5(1), 30–42.
  25. Suyadi. (2019a). Hybridization of Islamic Education and Neuroscience: Transdisciplinary Studies of ’Aql in the Quran and the Brain in Neuroscience. Dinamika Ilmu, 19(2), 1–20.
  26. Suyadi. (2019b). Mainstreaming the Knowledge of Islamic Education With Progress and of Islam Nusantara Education. Akademika, 24(1), 37–66.
  27. Suyadi. (2020). Pendidikan Islam dan Neurosains. (I. Lintang Novita, Ed.) (pertama). Jakarta: Kencana.
  28. Suyadi, A. (2020). Otak karakter dalam pendidikan Islam: Analisis kritis pendidikan karakter islam berbasis neurosains. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 10(1), 143–156.
  29. Suyadi, R. A. N. (2020). Konsep Akal Bertingkat Al-Farabi dalam Teori Neurosains dan Relevansinya dengan Pendidikan Islam. Tawazun: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 13(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.32832/tawazun.v13i1.2757
  30. Suyadi, S. (2018). Diferensiasi Otak Laki-laki dan Perempuan Guru Taman Kanak-kanak Aisyiyah Nyai Ahmad Dahlan Yogyakarta: Studi Pendidikan Islam Anak Usia Dini Perspektif Gender dan Neurosains. Sawwa: Jurnal Studi Gender, 13(2), 179. https://doi.org/10.2
  31. Suyadi, S. (2019). Pendidikan Islam Anak Usia Dini Dalam Perspektif Neurosains: Robotik, Akademik, Dan Saintifik. Edukasia : Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Islam, 13(2), 273–304. https://doi.org/10.21043/edukasia.v13i2.3255
  32. Wahab, Khairiansyah, H., & Misridah. (2020). Local Wisdom-based Character Values in Millennial Madurese Community: A Study of Molothen Traditions. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9(1), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpi.2020.91.57-77
  33. Wijaya Hengki. (2018). Pendidikan Neurosains Dan Implikasinya Dalam Pendidikan Masa Kini. Pendidikan Dasar, 2(March), 1–19.
  34. Zuhriy, M. S. (2011). Budaya Pesantren Dan Pendidikan Karakter Pada Pondok Pesantren Salaf. Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan, 19(2), 287. https://doi.org/10.21580/ws.2011.19.2.159