Article Sidebar

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 441 Download : 371

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

One of recent educational problems is in the evaluation of teacher performance. It is revealed that the practices of teacher performance evaluation are manual, intuitive, and less objective. It causes the evaluation of teachers’ performance has not been maximum.  This inability to carry out teacher performance evaluation must be analyzed in order to minimize evaluation practices that do not comply with procedures, so as to produce maximum assessments as material for sustainable evaluation. The aim of this research is to analyze the needs for teacher performance assessment practices in Indonesia. This research uses a qualitative approach of the systematic literature review (SLR) type. The tools used to compile literature are Publish and Perish and Google Scholar. The codification results find 25 articles about teacher performance evaluation. The codified articles are limited from 2018 -2022. The research results show that the most urgent need analysis is the requirement for teacher performance evaluation to determine the teacher's ability to do their responsibilities and to provide warnings and motivation to teachers. Good teachers are supported by the competence of good school principals as mentors, coaches, and developers in school progress.

Keywords

Needs Analysis Assessment Teacher Performance

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Alhabsyi, F., S. Pettalongi, S., & Wandi, W. (2022). Peran Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Guru. Jurnal Integrasi Manajemen Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.24239/jimpi.v1i1.898
  2. Anas, S. (2013). Pengantar evaluasi pendidikan. In Jakarta: Rajagrafindo (Vol. 2, Issue 1). Raja Grafindo Persada.
  3. Ariefana, P. (2019). Survei PPIM UIN Jakarta: 50,87 Guru dari TK - SMA Intoleran dan Radikal. Suara.com.
  4. Bertolini, M., Esposito, G., & Romagnoli, G. (2020). A TOPSIS-based approach for the best match between manufacturing technologies and product specifications. Expert Systems with Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113610
  5. Chakraborty, S. (2022). TOPSIS and Modified TOPSIS: A comparative analysis. Decision Analytics Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2021.100021
  6. Fabiyanto, A. R., Mursityo, Y. T., & Pramono, D. (2019). Pengembangan Sistem Informasi Penilaian Kinerja Guru Menggunakan Metode Rational Unified Process (RUP) Berbasis Web. Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer Universitas Brawijaya, 3(4), 3888–3895.
  7. Ferdinan, F. (2017). Penilaian Kinerja Mutu Pendidikan Agama Islam. TARBAWI : Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 1(2), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.26618/jtw.v1i2.366
  8. Gu, S., Liang, Y., Zhang, K., & Yang, J. (2022). Fuzzy Combination of TOPSIS and RSR for Comprehensively Assessing the Quality of National Essential Public Health Services. Chinese General Practice. https://doi.org/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.00.320
  9. Haseli Songhori, M. (2008). Munby Introduction to Needs Analysis. English for Specific Purposes World, 7(4), 1–25.
  10. Herdiyanto, H., & Lukman, L. (2022). Sistem Informasi Pramuka Berbasis Website Menggunakan Rational Unified Process. Building of Informatics, Technology and Science (BITS). https://doi.org/10.47065/bits.v4i2.1731
  11. Ibrahim, A., Muhammad, A. H., & Abdullah, S. Do. (2021). Implementasi Metode Anatithycal Proscess (AHP) Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Guru Berprestasi Pada Dinas Pendididikan Kabupaten Halmahera Utara. IJIS - Indonesian Journal On Information System. https://doi.org/10.36549/ijis.v6i1.129
  12. Ibrahim, D. (2020). Analisa Dan Perancangan Sistem Informasi Penilaian Kinerja Guru Berbasis Website Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (Saw). Jurnal Sistem Informasi Dan E-Bisnis (Jusibi), 2(1), 241–248.
  13. Informasi, S., Kinerja, P., Smp, G., & Web, B. (2022). Sistem informasi penilaian kinerja guru smp berbasis web. Jurnal Pustaka AI (Pusat Akses Kajian Teknologi Artificial Intelligence), 1(1), 7–13.
  14. J, P. P., & Prayuda, A. (2020). Analisis Pentingnya Pelatihan dan Disiplin Kerja Guna Meningkatkan Kinerja Guru di SMPN 14 Tangerang Selatan. Jurnal Ekonomi Efektif. https://doi.org/10.32493/jee.v2i2.4165
  15. Jdih.kemdikbud.go.id. (2003). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003. Undang-Undang Nomor. 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.
  16. Kurnia, Y. _. (2018). Penilaian Kinerja Guru MenggunKurnia, Y. _. (2018). Penilaian Kinerja Guru Menggunakan Metode Topsis. JSAI (Journal Scientific and Applied Informatics), 1(3), 70–75. https://doi.org/10.36085/jsai.v1i3.63akan Metode Topsis. JSAI (Journal Scientific and Applied Informatics), 1(3), 70–75. https://doi.org/10.36085/jsai.v1i3.63
  17. Liew, K. F., Lam, W. S., & Lam, W. H. (2022). Financial Network Analysis on the Performance of Companies Using Integrated Entropy–DEMATEL–TOPSIS Model. Entropy. https://doi.org/10.3390/e24081056
  18. Magdalena, H., Umami, U., & Santoso, H. (2019). System Model for Web-Based Teacher Performance Assessment. Jurnal Transformatika, 17(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.26623/transformatika.v17i1.1413
  19. Maitra, S., Sahoo, L., Lahiri Dey, J., & Tiwary, K. (2023). Multi-criteria Decision Making and Its Application to Online Learning Platform Selection During the COVID-19 Pandemic Based on TOPSIS Method. In Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4929-6_23
  20. Mengist, W., Soromessa, T., & Legese, G. (2020). Method for conducting systematic literature review and meta-analysis for environmental science research. MethodsX, 7, 100777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.100777
  21. Muhammad, A., & Gusrianty. (2019). Pengembangan Aplikasi Penilaian Kinerja Guru di Sekolah Menengah Pertama ( SMP ) Menggunakan Logika Fuzzy ( Studi Kasus : SMP Negeri 3 Mandau ). Jurnal Mahasiswa Aplikasi Teknologi Komputer Dan Informasi.
  22. Muliani, M. D., Aknuranda, I., & Rusydi, A. N. (2020). Perancangan Antarmuka Pengguna Sistem Informasi Penilaian Kinerja Guru Menggunakan Human Centered Design (HCD)(Studi Kasus: SMP Islam Sabilurrosyad Malang). Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer E-ISSN, 2548(September), 964X.
  23. Mulyani, A., Septiana, Y., & Alamsyah, R. (2022). Rancang Bangun Sistem Informasi Perpustakaan Menggunakan Metode Rational Unified Process. Jurnal Algoritma.
  24. Mulyasa. (2013). Menjadi Kepala Sekolah Profesional. In Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
  25. Muslimin. (2020). Program penilaian kinerja guru dan uji kompetensi guru dalam meningkatkan prestasi kerja guru. Indonesian Journal of Education Management & Administration Review, 4(1), 197–204.
  26. Mustika, F. A. (2021). Metode Fuzzy Sugeno untuk Penilaian Kinerja Guru SMK Tamansiswa 3 Jakarta. STRING (Satuan Tulisan Riset Dan Inovasi Teknologi). https://doi.org/10.30998/string.v6i1.8817
  27. Nadya Putri Mtd, Muhammad Ikhsan Butarbutar, Sri Apulina Br Sinulingga, Jelita Ramadhani Marpaung, & Rosa Marshanda Harahap. (2023). Pentingnya Evaluasi Dalam Pembelajaran Dan Akibat Memanipulasinya. Dewantara : Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora. https://doi.org/10.30640/dewantara.v2i1.722
  28. Nisa, K., Murti Dewanto, F., Robi Waliyansyah, R., Pusat Lantai, G., & Sidodadi Timur, J. (2021). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Guru (PKG) Menggunakan Metode Topsis (Studi Kasus : SDN 01 Gabus). Jurnal Pengembangan Rekayasa Dan Teknologi.
  29. Nurhasyim, N., Arafat, Y., & Wardiah, D. (2021). The effect of principal supervision competence and teacher motivation on teacher performance in primary schools. JPGI (Jurnal Penelitian Guru Indonesia), 6(2), 581. https://doi.org/10.29210/021092jpgi0005
  30. Oktavia, A. V., & Gata, G. (2020). Penilaian Kinerja Guru Terbaik Pada Smk Putra Satria Dengan Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW). IDEALIS : InDonEsiA JournaL Information System. https://doi.org/10.36080/idealis.v3i1.1716
  31. Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., Mcdonald, S., … Mckenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. The BMJ, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
  32. Pramana, H. J., Mufizar, T., Anwar, D. S., & Septianingrum, I. (2022). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Guru Dengan Metode AHP dan PROMETHEE. It (Informatic Technique) Journal, 10(1), 87. https://doi.org/10.22303/it.10.1.2022.87-99
  33. Purnamawanti, C., Suliswiyadi, S., & Nugroho, I. (2018). Pengaruh Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru Kelas Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA di MI Muhammadiyah Kalibanger Kabupaten Temanggung. Jurnal Tarbiyatuna, 9(1), 33–40.
  34. Rahayu, S., & Sindar, A. (2022). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Guru Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting. Jurnal Ilmu Komputer Dan Informatika. https://doi.org/10.54082/jiki.28
  35. Rahman, A., Fitri, Z., Zulkifli, Z., Ula, M., & Suhendra, B. (2022). Analysis of the Teacher’s Role in Evaluation of Student Learning Performance Using the TOPSIS Model (Case Study of Smk Negeri 1 Lhokseumawe). Journal of Informatics and Telecommunication Engineering, 5(2), 452–462. https://doi.org/10.31289/jite.v5i2.6288
  36. Rosidah, A. S., Rahman, W. I., Aulia, M., Ariansyah, A., & Fauzi, I. (2022). Penilian Kinerja Guru Di Sekolah Dasar, Antara Tantangan Dan Peluang. DIMAR: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 4(1), 001–023. https://doi.org/10.58577/dimar.v4i1.93
  37. Roy, P., & Patro, B. (2021). Financial Performance Analysis of NBFC-MFIs in India using TOPSIS and IV-TOPSIS. International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences. https://doi.org/10.33889/IJMEMS.2021.6.5.086
  38. Scholar, G. (2023a). Rational Unified Process (RUP).
  39. Scholar, G. (2023b). Topsis 2023.
  40. Setyawan, D., Suryadi, A., & Nurbaiti, D. E. (2021). Aplikasi Monitoring Dalam Evaluasi Akademik Untuk Penilaian Kinerja Guru Berbasis Web di SDN 001 Nongsa. JR : Jurnal Responsive Teknik Informatika, 5(01), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.36352/jr.v5i01.191
  41. Sintawati, F. R. D. A. I., Joebagio, H., & Sutimin, L. A. (2018). Pengaruh Pemanfaatan Aplikasi Penilaian Kinerja Guru Terhadap Peningkatan Profesionalisme Guru. Teknodika, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.20961/teknodika.v16i1.34754
  42. Sudarma, M., Ariyani, S., & Wicaksana, P. A. (2021). Implementation of the Rational Unified Process (RUP) Model in Design Planning of Sales Order Management System. INTENSIF: Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian Dan Penerapan Teknologi Sistem Informasi. https://doi.org/10.29407/intensif.v5i2.15543
  43. Sugawara, E., & Nikaido, H. (2014). Properties of AdeABC and AdeIJK efflux systems of Acinetobacter baumannii compared with those of the AcrAB-TolC system of Escherichia coli. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 58(12), 7250–7257. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.03728-14
  44. Surya Darma. (2013). Pedoman Pelaksanaan Penilaian Kinerja Guru. In Physics in Medicine and Biology (Vol. 48, Issue 8).
  45. Wei, C. C., Cheng, Y. L., & Lee, K. L. (2019). How to select suitable manufacturing information system outsourcing projects by using TOPSIS method. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1572930
  46. Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
  47. Yeh, C. H. (2003). The Selection of Multiattribute Decision Making Methods for Scholarship Student Selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0965-075X.2003.00252.x
  48. Yulianto, W. (2018). Pengelolaan Aplikasi Penilaian Kinerja Guru Di Smk Negeri 2 Sragen Berbasis Web. Jurnal Litbang Sukowati : Media Penelitian Dan Pengembangan, 1(2), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.32630/sukowati.v1i2.20
  49. Yuniarti, D., & Lingga, L. (2019). The Effect of Human Resource Training and Development on Improving Teacher Performance at Muntok 1 Vocational School. Efektor, 6(1), 98. https://doi.org/10.29407/e.v6i1.12794
  50. Yuprastiwi, Y., Setiawan, A. B., & Sahertian, J. (2020). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Guru Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Seminar Nasional Inovasi Teknologi.
  51. Zheng, Y., & Sun, C. (2022). Construction Scheme of Quantitative Assessment of College Teachers’ Performance Based on Big Data Analysis. Mobile Information Systems, 2022(Query date: 2023-06-10 04:24:08). https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8373164