Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 354 Download : 105

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The development of lightweight electric cars for urban mobility requires efficient aerodynamic design without sacrificing space efficiency. This study presents a novel method by investigating the combination of a two-seater city car's compact dimensions and square back shape, which has not been extensively researched for low- to medium-velocity vehicles. This study's objective is to assess the design's aerodynamic performance using numerical simulations using the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) approach. The vehicle model is designed with a compact body and square back, which is commonly used in small vehicles with high maneuverability requirements. The simulations are conducted at three different air velocity levels: 10, 20, and 30 m/s. The results of the study showed an increase in the value of the drag coefficient (Cd) along with an increase in flow velocity. At a velocity of 10 m/s, the Cd value was recorded at 0.4536. When the velocity increased to 20 m/s, the drag coefficient increased slightly to 0.4563. Further increases in velocity to 30 m/s resulted in a Cd value of 0.4581. This Cd value shows the consistency of aerodynamic performance with increasing velocity, with fluctuations that remain within the efficiency limits of lightweight vehicles. The pressure distribution contour shows high-pressure accumulation at the front and low pressure at the rear of the vehicle, which generates large turbulent wakes in the rear area and contributes to increased drag. These findings indicate that the square rear body design faces significant aerodynamic challenges. Therefore, design strategies such as adding a rear spoiler, using a rear diffuser, and optimizing the rear body angle are suggested as potential solutions to improve flow efficiency.

Keywords

Aerodynamics study City car Square back Compact design CFD Drag coefficient

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

  1. F. Alanazi, “Electric Vehicles: Benefits, Challenges, and Potential Solutions for Widespread Adaptation,” Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 10, p. 6016, May 2023, doi: 10.3390/app13106016.
  2. A. M. Al-Ghaili, H. Kasim, H. Aris, and N. M. Al-Hada, “Can electric vehicles be an alternative for traditional fossil-fuel cars with the help of renewable energy sources towards energy sustainability achievement?,” Energy Informatics, vol. 5, no. 4, p. 60, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s42162-022-00234-3.
  3. M. Muratori et al., “The rise of electric vehicles—2020 status and future expectations,” Progress in Energy, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 022002, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1088/2516-1083/abe0ad.
  4. Ó. Silva, R. Cordera, E. González-González, and S. Nogués, “Environmental impacts of autonomous vehicles: A review of the scientific literature,” Science of The Total Environment, vol. 830, p. 154615, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154615.
  5. A. Ewert, M. Brost, C. Eisenmann, and S. Stieler, “Small and Light Electric Vehicles: An Analysis of Feasible Transport Impacts and Opportunities for Improved Urban Land Use,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 19, p. 8098, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12198098.
  6. R. P. Putra, D. Yuvenda, M. Setyo, A. Andrizal, and M. Martias, “Body City Car Design of Two Passengers Capacity: A Numerical Simulation Study,” Automotive Experiences, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 163–172, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.31603/ae.6304.
  7. R. P. Putra et al., “Design and Crash Test on a Two-Passenger City Car Frame using Finite Element Method,” Automotive Experiences, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 270–283, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.31603/ae.11306.
  8. R. P. Putra, D. Yuvenda, W. Afnison, A. R. Saleh, and D. Harmanto, “Chassis Strength Analysis of a City Car with a Capacity of Two Passengers,” in Smart Innovation in Mechanical Engineering, 2025, pp. 421–428. doi: 10.1007/978-981-97-7898-0_47.
  9. A. Taleghani and F. Torabi, “Editorial: Recent developments in aerodynamics,” Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 10, p. 1537383, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.3389/fmech.2024.1537383.
  10. C. Romero, P. Correa, E. Ariza Echeverri, and D. Vergara, “Strategies for Reducing Automobile Fuel Consumption,” Applied Sciences, vol. 14, p. 910, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.3390/app14020910.
  11. J. Piechna, “A Review of Active Aerodynamic Systems for Road Vehicles,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 23, p. 7887, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.3390/en14237887.
  12. H. Mansour, R. Afify, and O. Kassem, “Three-Dimensional Simulation of New Car Profile,” Fluids, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 8, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.3390/fluids6010008.
  13. J. Waluyo, S. Hariyanto, and N. Lestari, “Evaluation of Spoiler Design on the Aerodynamic Performance of an Energy-Efficient Car Prototype Body,” Engineering and Technology Journal, vol. 09, pp. 4972–4977, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.47191/etj/v9i08.49.
  14. N. Kamal et al., “A Review of Aerodynamics Influence on Various Car Model Geometry through CFD Techniques,” Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, vol. 88, pp. 109–125, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.37934/arfmts.88.1.109125.
  15. R. D. R. Mariaprakasam, S. Mat, P. M. Samin, N. Othman, M. Ab Wahid, and M. Said, “Review on flow controls for vehicles aerodynamic drag reduction,” Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 11–36, 2023.
  16. R. Stephen, “Research and Development of a Body Kit for Passenger Cars to Enhance Aerodynamic Efficiency,” Kaunas University of Technology, 2021.
  17. M. G. Connolly, A. Ivankovic, and M. J. O’Rourke, “Drag reduction technology and devices for road vehicles - A comprehensive review,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 13, p. e33757, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33757.
  18. F. Szodrai, “Quantitative Analysis of Drag Reduction Methods for Blunt Shaped Automobiles,” Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 12, p. 4313, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.3390/app10124313.
  19. G. Sivaraj, K. M. Parammasivam, M. S. Prasath, P. Vadivelu, and D. Lakshmanan, “Low analysis of rear end body shape of the vehicle for better aerodynamic performance,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 47, no. xxxx, pp. 2175–2181, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.521.
  20. M. Aultman, “Computational Investigation of Incremental Design Changes on the Aerodynamics of a Production Automotive Vehicle: Roof Spoiler and Underbody Geometry,” The Ohio State University, 2023.
  21. A. Guerrero and R. Castilla, “Aerodynamic Study of the Wake Effects on a Formula 1 Car,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 19, p. 5183, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.3390/en13195183.
  22. H. Bagheri-Esfeh, M. Rostamzadeh-Renani, R. Rostamzadeh-Renani, and H. Safihkani, “Multi-objective optimisation of drag and lift coefficients of a car integrated with canards,” International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 346–362, May 2020, doi: 10.1080/10618562.2020.1766031.
  23. D. S. Nath, P. C. Pujari, A. Jain, and V. Rastogi, “Drag reduction by application of aerodynamic devices in a race car,” Advances in Aerodynamics, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 4, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1186/s42774-020-00054-7.
  24. G. Shankar, G. Devaradjane, and S. Sunil, “Investigation on aerodynamic behaviour of a SUV car model with vortex generators at different yaw conditions,” Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 103–117, 2019, doi: 10.29252/jafm.75.253.28851.
  25. N. A. Siddiqui and M. A. Chaab, “A simple passive device for the drag reduction of an ahmed body,” Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 147–164, 2020, doi: 10.47176/jafm.14.01.31791.
  26. Z. Arifin et al., “Aerodynamic Characteristics of Ahmed Body with Inverted Airfoil Eppler 423 and Gurney Flap on Fastback Car,” Automotive Experiences, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 355–370, 2022, doi: 10.31603/ae.7067.
  27. M. N. Sudin, M. Abdullah, S. Shamsudin, F. Ramli, and M. Tahir, “Review of research on vehicles aerodynamic drag reduction methods,” International Journal of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, vol. 14, pp. 35–47, Apr. 2014.

Most read articles by the same author(s)