Manuscript Readiness Level (MRL)
Before you submit your manuscript, it is highly recommended that you pre-evaluate it using Manuscript Readiness Level (MRL), an instrument that we developed to help you get the most effective time in the peer-reviewing process.
(Level 1)
|
(level 2)
|
(level 3)
|
||
| Title: Straightforward, informative, and represents the contents of the article. | ||||
|
Abstract: Concise but at least contains the problem, purpose, method, important findings, and implications of the research.
|
||||
|
Keywords: Searchable by a search engine, truly represent the intention of the research. Don’t use phrases, only words. 5 to 6 keywords are recommended.
|
||||
|
Introduction: Directing the reader about the importance of the research. Presenting significant problems, a clear state of the art, gap analysis, and novel concepts to fill the gaps. End it with the purpose of research.
|
||||
|
Method: Clear and replicable. Reveals how research objectives are achieved with the appropriate tools, procedures, and stages.
|
||||
|
Results: Presenting experimental or survey data, or any other kind of data, depending on the type of research. The results are generally presented in clear and readable tables and figures.
|
||||
|
Discussion: Meaningful. Good discussion is written as a dialogue that reveals the progress of the research in comparison to previous research.
|
||||
|
Conclusion: Contains a summary of research results (the most important research finding) that relates to the objectives written in the introduction.
|
||||
|
References: Accountable, about 80% of the literature from primary sources (reputable journals) and up to date (last 10 years). Use reference management tools.
|
||||
Decision matrix
| Probability | |
85-100
|
Most likely to be published with little discussion with Editor/Reviewer
|
70-84
|
Possible minor revision (if there are no mistakes in principle)
|
50-69
|
Possible major revision
|
25-49
|
Most likely to be rejected in the first stage
|
Disclaimer: The Manuscript Readiness Level (MRL) above is used by authors as a “tool” to optimize the peer-reviewing process. The decision to accept or reject an article for publication in Automotive Experiences is the authority of the Editor based on recommendations from reviewers.
author
Author Information Pack
Journal Policies

Manuscript Preparation

Revision Required