Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 2450 Download : 4768

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The unsuccessful factors of religious education practice that are often found in schools regarding the achievement of student learning outcomes are assumed to focus more on aspects of cognitive abilities rather than the growth of religious awareness, neglect of the touch of affective aspects development, adoption of Bloom's cognitive-taxative affective domain practices. This study aims to uncover the epistemological point of view that discusses the problems of the concept of scientific theory in aspects of learning the perspective of the Qur'an. The contribution of the results of the study or novelty of this finding is beneficial for the practice of Islamic religious education learning in order to develop an affective domain according to the concepts of the Koran. The study method used "critical analytical", namely the process of critical thinking to explain concepts according to relevant information sources. The focus of this study's discussion is the concept of learning revealed in the text of the Qur'an, both in the form of primary and secondary data sources. The results of the study concluded that the study of the elements of the Quran in the Koran gave birth to the affective domain of the Qur'ani taxonomic affinity, namely: Imani Domain, consisting of the level of belief (lil i'tiqady) and receiving (littalaqy); Islamic domain, consisting of the level of intention to respond (niyyat al rad), organizing (tandzim), and actualization (tahqiiq); and the Ihsani Domain, consisting of the level of sincerity (al ikhlash), and supervised (al muraqabah).

Keywords

The Affective Domain PAI Learning Qur'ani Taxonomy

Article Details

References

  1. Al-Attas, S. M. (1980). The Concept of Education in Islam. Kuala Lumpur: ABIM.
  2. Al-Abrasyi, M. `. (1380 H/1961 M). Al-Tarbiyah fi Al-Islam . Kairo: al-Majlisu al-A`la li al-Suuni al-Islamiyah.
  3. Al Ghazali, I. (1058). Ihya’ ulumuddin (Vol. 2). Kairo: Dar al-Kutub.
  4. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., … Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing : a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (Abridged e).
  5. Bakar, A. (2011). TAFSIR TARBAWI (Pendekatan Pemahaman Wahyu Berbasis Pendidikan). Jurusan Syari’ah STAIN Ponorog, 6(1), 47–65.
  6. Bible, L., Coran, L., La, E., & Bucaille, M. (1979). Maurice Bucaille 1979.
  7. Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. . (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. (B.S Bloom, Ed.) (I). New York: David McKay Co Inc.
  8. Haq, A. S. (2018). Konsep Pendidikan Islam dalam Al-Quran (Studi Tafsir Tematik) (Vol. 1). https://doi.org/10.15439/2019F121
  9. Hardiyati, M. (2019). Pendidikan Perspektif Al-Quran ( Studi Tafsir Tarbawi Karya Ahmad Munir ). Penelitian, 13(01), 97–122.
  10. Hermawan, H. (2018). Kebijakan-Kebijakan Pendidikan Agama Islam Dalam Memberantas Korupsi. Jurnal Tarbiyatuna, 9(1), 47–61.
  11. Kokasih, A., Fahrudin, & Anwar, S. (2009). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran PAI Melalui Pembinaan Keagamaan Berbasis Tutorial. Jurnal Penelitian, 9(1).
  12. Maraghi, M. M., Sitanggal, K. A. U., Aly, H. N., & Abubakar, B. (1986). Terjemah Tafsir Al-Maraghi. Pustaka Al-Azhar, Kuala Lumpur.
  13. Priatna, T., Ratnasih, T., & Taqwim, A. (2017). Konsep Manusia Ahsani Taqwim Dan Refleksinya Dalam Pendidikan Islam. Artikel Ilmiah.
  14. Sari, L. M. (2018). Evaluasi dalam Pendidikan Islam. Al-Tadzkiyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9(2), 211–231.
  15. Siswanto. (2013). Model Pengembangan Pendidikan Agama Islam Di Sekolah. TADRIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(2), 142–157. https://doi.org/10.19105/jpi.v5i2.372
  16. Suriasumantri, J. S. (1999). Ilmu dalam perspektif. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
  17. Susanto, H. (2014). Filsafat Manusia Ibnu Arabi. Tsaqafah, 10(1), 109. https://doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v10i1.66