Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1108 Download : 748

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Autonomy is often seen as an institutional instrument to manage sub state nationalist conflict. Its implementation is also a key in determining its impact on conflict. After the reform period 1999 “Autonomy and Decentralization” in Indonesia are widely welcomed. While Papua is an inseparable part of special autonomy in Indonesia. Papua as a former Dutch territory which was later handed over to Indonesia has many advantages, both in terms of culture, customary law and natural resources. But on the other hand, the fact is that the indigenous Papuan people does not agree to join as part of Indonesian territory. This rejection was accompanied by separatist actions based on their interest mentioned in the memorandum for Papuan independence. This research is the first to aim to measure whether the special autonomy given to Papua has been effectively carried out in an effort to defend Papua as a part of Indonesia. Second, in the application of this special autonomy related to the existent of customary criminal law in papua. The research used normative legal research by statute approach, the data collected through library research and also analysed used descriptive qualitative. So it is concluded that the application of the special autonomy given to Papua has a big impact on democracy in Indonesia, as well as the Papua regional government given specialization in managing its regional potential. Although there are still problems in its implementation.

Keywords

Papua Special Autonomy Adat Law

Article Details

References

  1. Achbar Madya Persada, Jayus, I. R. S. (2020). Sistem Noken dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah di Papua (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 35/Php.Bup-XVI/2018). Interdisciplinary Journal on Law, Social Sciences and Humanities, 01(2 (2021)), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.19184/ijl.v1i1.22179
  2. Aiza, N. (n.d.). Tindakan Niki Paleg Suku.
  3. Bauw, L. (2016). Special Autonomy of Papua : A Review from the Perspective of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia. Papua Law Journal, 1(1), 1–26.
  4. Bertrand, J. (2014). Nationalism and Ethnic Politics Autonomy and Stability : The Perils of Implementation and “ Divide-and-Rule ” Tactics in Papua , Indonesia. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 20(2), 174–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537113.2014.909157
  5. Chauvel, R., & Bhakti, I. N. (2004). The Papua Conflict : Jakarta ’ s Perceptions and Policies (P. Studies (ed.); 5th ed.). East-West Center Washington’s Project.
  6. Diana Indramaya. (2019). Eksistensi Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2001 Tentang Otonomi Khusus Bagi Provinsi Papua (Existence of The Act Number 21/2001 On Special Authonomy of Papua Province). Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 19(10), 517–538.
  7. Farid, A. H. (2019). Masyarakat Hukum Adat: Ada Atau Tiada? 6(11), 951–952.
  8. Febrianti, S. W., Arum, A. S., Dermawan, W., & Akim. (2019). Internal Conflict Resolution between Government of Indonesia and Separatist Movement in Papua using Horse-Trading Mechanism. Society, 7(2), 83–100.
  9. Fujikawa, K. (2017). Drifting between accommodation and repression : explaining Indonesia ’ s policies toward its separatists. The Pacific Review, 30(5), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2017.1293713
  10. Gatot Suprasetya. (2021). Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Penerapan Hukum Adat Dalam Menyelesaikan Kasus Tindak Pidana Di Papua. 6(11), 951–952., 2, 12.
  11. Katharina, R. (2017). Deliberative Formulation of Papua Special Autonomy Policy. International Journal of Administrative Science & Organizing, 24(2), 69–77.
  12. Lefaan, A., Nugroho, H., & Mudiono. (2012). Etnosentrisme Dan Politik Representasi Di Era Otonomi Khusus Papua. Jurnal Majalah Ilmiah Pembelajaran Edisi Khusus, 1–18.
  13. Lubbi, M. M. (2021). Analisis Sistem Pemilihan Umum Noken Di Provinsi Papua Dalam Prinsip Demokrasi Dan Sistem Hukum Nasional. 1(July).
  14. Lubis, S., Hutabarat, M., & Nasution, M. R. (2019). Undang Undang Dasar 1945. 4(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/498dh
  15. Mcgibbon, R. (2004). Secessionist Challenges in Aceh and Papua : Is Special Autonomy the Solution ? (P. Studies (ed.); 10th ed.). East-West Center Washington.
  16. Musa’ad, M. A. (2011). Kontektualisasi Pelaksanaan Otonomi Khusus di Provinsi Papua: Perspektif Struktur dan Kewenangan Pemerintah. Journal Kajian, 16(2), 357–385.
  17. Muttaqin, A. (2013). Otonomi Khusus Papua Sebuah Upaya Merespon Konflik Dan Aspirasi Kemerdekaan Papua Azmi Muttaqin. Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 4(1), 5–18.
  18. Nainggolan, N. A. F. B., & Marzuki. (2021). Peran Badan Pengawas Pemilu Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Pemilu Berdasarkan Undang-undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 (Studi Pada Bawaslu Kabupaten Deli Serdang). 2(1), 160–170.
  19. Nur Iftitah Isnantiana. (2017). Legal Reasoning Hakim dalam Pengambilan Putusan Perkara di Pengadilan. Islamadina, 18(2), 53.
  20. Papua.go.id. (2014). Pemerintah Provinsi Papua - Arti Lambang Papua.
  21. Putro, B. B. (2019). N Makna Dibalik Tradisi Niki Paleg Suku Dani di Papua. Commed : Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Media, 3(2), 159. https://doi.org/10.33884/commed.v3i2.1257
  22. Ragawino, B. (2008). Pengantar dan Asas-asas Hukum Adat Indonesia. 65.
  23. Rahab, A. al. (2006). Operasi-operasi Militer di Papua: Pagar Makan Tanaman? Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 3(1), 3–23.
  24. Resosudarmo, B. P., Mollet, J. A., Raya, U. R., & Kaiwai, H. (2014). Development in Papua after special autonomy. ISEAS.
  25. Ronsumbre, N. (2019). Sistem Noken Papua: Manifestasi Demokrasi Berbasis Kearifan Lokal. Jurnal Sosial Politik, 5(2), 261. https://doi.org/10.22219/sospol.v5i2.7388
  26. Siregar, F. A. (2018). Ciri Hukum Adat Dan Karakteristiknya. Jurnal Al-Maqasid : Jurnal Ilmu Kesyariahan Dan Keperdataan, 4(2), 1–14.
  27. Stepanus, M., & Nugraha, N. (2012). Otonomi Khusus Papua (Nugraha (ed.)). Ar Raafi.
  28. Syarifuddin, L., Hukum, F., & Mulawarman, U. (2021). Kedudukan Hukum Terhadap Upaya Penyelesaian Syattar. 1(2), 84–93.
  29. Waluyo, W. (2019). Model Pemilu Dengan Sistem Noken Berbasis Budaya dan Kearifan Lokal. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 13(2), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v13i2.1065
  30. Zairudin, A. (2021). Mekanisme Penetapan Daftar Pemilih dalam Perspektif Hukum. Legal Studies Journal, 7, 18–36.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>