Remaining useful life prognosis of low-speed slew bearing using random vector functional link

Main Article Content

Wahyu Caesarendra
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9784-4204
Dimas Revindra Rahardja
Muhammad Abdillah
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0038-4780
Seno Darmanto
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6027-4757
Sri Utami Handayani
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0145-1175
Wahyu Dwi Lestari
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5863-4968
Grzegorz Krolczyk

Abstract

Bearings have a very important role in an industry. However, the cost of maintenance and replacement of bearings are very expensive especially for slew-bearing which operated in a very low speed. If the low-speed slew bearing shutdown suddenly, it will also cause a financial issue to the certain industries with rely on the rotating machines because the entire machine will be shut down and the production will be stop Therefore, monitoring of the low-speed slew bearing condition at all times is necessary to predict the bearing failure. There has been advance monitoring devices and systems related to the vibration condition monitoring for bearing and rotating machines, however, in certain cases those monitoring devices and systems are not sufficient. Machine learning is offered to complement and contribute in this case which aims to determine the prediction and Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of the bearing before the bearing experiences more damage. In this paper, the Random Vector Functional Link (RVFL) is used to predict RUL using low speed slew bearing data from University of Wollongong, Australia. The main evaluation matrix such as RMSE is used as an evaluation of the performance of the model used. According to the prediction results, the best modeling results are obtained using a data ratio of 80:20 and a SELU activation function that produces the best average RMSE value. The prediction value of Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of the bearing is 94.24%.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

[1] F. Xu et al., “A review of bearing failure Modes, mechanisms and causes,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 152, p. 107518, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107518.
[2] W. Caesarendra, “Vibration and acoustic emission-based condition monitoring and prognostic methods for very low speed slew bearing,” University of Wollongong, 2015.
[3] G. V. P. Babu and M. P. Devi, “Slew Bearing Back Lash Checking Importance for Stackers/ Reclaimers and Mobile Harbour Cranes for the Availability of the Equipment-Ports Service Quality,” TEST Engineering and Management, 2020.
[4] T. Gao, Y. Li, X. Huang, and C. Wang, “Data-Driven Method for Predicting Remaining Useful Life of Bearing Based on Bayesian Theory,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 1, p. 182, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.3390/s21010182.
[5] R. N. Toma, A. E. Prosvirin, and J.-M. Kim, “Bearing Fault Diagnosis of Induction Motors Using a Genetic Algorithm and Machine Learning Classifiers,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 7, p. 1884, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.3390/s20071884.
[6] D. Maulud and A. M. Abdulazeez, “A Review on Linear Regression Comprehensive in Machine Learning,” Journal of Applied Science and Technology Trends, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 140–147, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.38094/jastt1457.
[7] S. Zhang, S. Zhang, B. Wang, and T. G. Habetler, “Deep Learning Algorithms for Bearing Fault Diagnostics—A Comprehensive Review,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 29857–29881, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2972859.
[8] A. Z. Hinchi and M. Tkiouat, “Rolling element bearing remaining useful life estimation based on a convolutional long-short-term memory network,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 127, pp. 123–132, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2018.01.106.
[9] X. Chen, B. Zhang, and D. Gao, “Bearing fault diagnosis base on multi-scale CNN and LSTM model,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 971–987, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10845-020-01600-2.
[10] R. Katuwal, P. N. Suganthan, and M. Tanveer, “Random Vector Functional Link Neural Network based Ensemble Deep Learning,” Computer Science, Jun. 2019, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.00350
[11] A. K. Malik, R. Gao, M. A. Ganaie, M. Tanveer, and P. N. Suganthan, “Random vector functional link network: Recent developments, applications, and future directions,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 143, p. 110377, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110377.
[12] W. Dai, Q. Chen, F. Chu, X. Ma, and T. Chai, “Robust Regularized Random Vector Functional Link Network and Its Industrial Application,” IEEE Access, vol. 5, pp. 16162–16172, 2017, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2737459.
[13] S. Wang, J. Chen, H. Wang, and D. Zhang, “Degradation evaluation of slewing bearing using HMM and improved GRU,” Measurement, vol. 146, pp. 385–395, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.06.038.
[14] B. Y. Kosasih, W. Caesarendra, K. Tieu, A. Widodo, C. A. S. Moodie, and A. K. Tieu, “Degradation Trend Estimation and Prognosis of Large Low Speed Slewing Bearing Lifetime,” Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 493, pp. 343–348, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.493.343.
[15] W. Cao, J. Gao, Z. Ming, S. Cai, and H. Zheng, “Impact of Probability Distribution Selection on RVFL Performance,” in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2018, pp. 114–124. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-73830-7_12.
[16] S. P. Mishra et al., “An efficient Robust Random Vector Functional Link network for Solar Irradiance, Power and Wind speed prediction,” in 2021 1st Odisha International Conference on Electrical Power Engineering, Communication and Computing Technology(ODICON), IEEE, Jan. 2021, pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1109/ODICON50556.2021.9428977.
[17] R. Alkhatib, “Artificial Neural Network Activation Functions in Exact Analytical Form (Heaviside, ReLU, PReLU, ELU, SELU, ELiSH),” Aug. 06, 2021. doi: 10.36227/techrxiv.15096888.v1.
[18] A. D. Rasamoelina, F. Adjailia, and P. Sincak, “A Review of Activation Function for Artificial Neural Network,” in 2020 IEEE 18th World Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics (SAMI), IEEE, Jan. 2020, pp. 281–286. doi: 10.1109/SAMI48414.2020.9108717.
[19] A. S. Ahmar, “Forecast Error Calculation with Mean Squared Error (MSE) and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE),” JINAV: Journal of Information and Visualization, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 94–96, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.35877/454RI.jinav303.
[20] T. O. Hodson, “Root-mean-square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE): when to use them or not,” Geoscientific Model Development, vol. 15, no. 14, pp. 5481–5487, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.5194/gmd-15-5481-2022.
[21] D. C. E. Saputra, K. Sunat, and T. Ratnaningsih, “A New Artificial Intelligence Approach Using Extreme Learning Machine as the Potentially Effective Model to Predict and Analyze the Diagnosis of Anemia,” Healthcare, vol. 11, no. 5, p. 697, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.3390/healthcare11050697.
[22] M. Shariati, D. J. Armaghani, M. Khandelwal, J. Zhou, and M. Khorami, “Assessment of Longstanding Effects of Fly Ash and Silica Fume on the Compressive Strength of Concrete Using Extreme Learning Machine and Artificial Neural Network,” Journal of Advanced Engineering and Computation, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 50, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.25073/jaec.202151.308.
[23] J. Wang, S. Lu, S.-H. Wang, and Y.-D. Zhang, “A review on extreme learning machine,” Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 81, no. 29, pp. 41611–41660, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11042-021-11007-7.
[24] H. Wei, Q. Zhang, M. Shang, and Y. Gu, “Extreme learning Machine-based classifier for fault diagnosis of rotating Machinery using a residual network and continuous wavelet transform,” Measurement, vol. 183, p. 109864, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109864.
[25] M. Shariati et al., “A novel hybrid extreme learning machine–grey wolf optimizer (ELM-GWO) model to predict compressive strength of concrete with partial replacements for cement,” Engineering with Computers, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 757–779, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s00366-020-01081-0.
[26] Z. Yu, J. Liu, M. Yang, Y. Cheng, J. Hu, and X. Li, “An Elderly Fall Detection Method Based on Federated Learning and Extreme Learning Machine (Fed-ELM),” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 130816–130824, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3229044.
[27] P. Kulkarni, V. Watwe, T. Chavan, and S. Kulkarni, “Artificial Neural Networking for remediation of methylene blue dye using Fuller’s earth clay,” Current Research in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, vol. 4, p. 100131, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.crgsc.2021.100131.
[28] G. D.R., “Application of Artificial Neural Networking Technique to Predict the Geotechnical Aspects of Expansive Soil: A Review,” International Journal of Engineering and Manufacturing, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 48–53, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.5815/ijem.2021.06.05.
[29] D. A. Otchere, T. O. Arbi Ganat, R. Gholami, and S. Ridha, “Application of supervised machine learning paradigms in the prediction of petroleum reservoir properties: Comparative analysis of ANN and SVM models,” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, vol. 200, p. 108182, May 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2020.108182.
[30] W. Caesarendra, P. B. Kosasih, A. K. Tieu, C. A. S. Moodie, and B.-K. Choi, “Condition monitoring of naturally damaged slow speed slewing bearing based on ensemble empirical mode decomposition,” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 2253–2262, Aug. 2013, doi: 10.1007/s12206-013-0608-7.